to quote from Pulp Fiction.. example...?
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:35:14 +1000, Natalie Buxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
I'm wrestling with a float that just wont behave.
I'm trying to stop the content from escaping from the float itself.
The floats are a fluid % width and a fluid
The height is constraining the box...
I think you have two choices:
add overflow : hidden|auto (will hide or scroll excess content)
remove the height attribute and control height some other way.
Good Luck.
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:35:14 +1000, Natalie Buxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Hi Guys,
I have just joined the list after attending WE04.
My name is Todd Baker and I work as a XSLT/XHTML/CSS developer in Sydney.
I am doing a big CSS based rebuild for one of our clients and am
having some troubles with our fluid layout.
I want to use horizontal lists for our primary
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 14:20:24 +1000, Neerav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just a quick thought that may be completely wrong, but have you tried %
based padding for li ?
Thanks Neerav,
Same thing.. I have to use VERY small % (like 1%) or it spreads out
HUGE and then it hardly expands at all as the
Interesting approach...
I was trying to use padding/margins as I wanted to ensure that XXX
menu itme wasnt as wide as XX if ya know what I mean.
Your solution does work but ive lost the variable widths. Ill have a
play with it.
Yeah the IE min-width thing is a b***ch. Im using the
I too like the design, I wish I could design like that.
My only comment would be that I think the standard font size is a bit
small.. yes I know you can resize it but a well sighted person
shouldnt have to.
My 50c worth.
--
Todd Baker
http://electronet.com.au - Where electrons go for a good
://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Todd Baker
http://electronet.com.au - Where electrons go for a good time
I think you'll find that ...
A: You can't detect that.
B: Its best left in the users hands.
The back button is the lifeline of many users. Sometimes its the ONLY
click that they know EXACTLY where they will go. To do anything with
script would be a usability disaster.
I think you need to
hang on a sec.. Ill just pick my jaw up of the ground
Thats amazing.
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 15:36:18 +1100, russ - maxdesign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=http://www.css-praxis.de/cssocean/zenoc
ean.css
Make sure you look in a good browser and scroll down!
/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Todd Baker
http://electronet.com.au - Where electrons go for a good time
system to Suckerfish (with
the menu's in the source, not JS arrays) that allowed for 2 levels and
gave some kind of control over a delay before menu is hidden.
Regards
Todd Baker
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
Hello Everyone,
We are in final testing for a largish site that uses a large amount of
background images for navigation and various graphical effects (as all
CSS-based sites do).
We are finding that the background images for our main navigation are
downloading last and as such the white text is
Thats a big call Ted.
Ill be happy to see that back of IE6 as much as anyone but I think it
will be well into next year before IE7 overtakes IE6, even if they do
roll it into XP SP3.
Your right tho... We need to start planning for it.
On 02/02/06, Ted Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will
On 02/02/06, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're assuming the background image will arrive. What happens if
someone has images turned off? You should specify a background colour
as well.
Yes indeed we are adding a background colour that its close to the graphic.
Is there any
Thanks Terrence Wood, yes the nav items work with images turned off,
they have a bg color as well as an image.
Jay Gilmore, www.smh.com.au has most of their images in these files --
http://www.smh.com.au/css/2005/img/sprite_section-strap.gif
http://www.smh.com.au/css/2005/img/sprite_li.gif
Not
The main reason I dont use absolute positioning for all my layout is
that most of the sites I build require footers at the base of the page
content.
With every page of differing content length the only way to achieve
this is to float and then clear for the footer.
Thats just me. There are wiser
I'm also a front end developer working with .NET all the time.
.NET is a BASTARD to get to validate. Its possible but its hard work1
Visual Studio changes case on things like onClick etc and whilst they are
not biggies they are frustrating. As Chris pointed out it pumps out heaps of
script and
17 matches
Mail list logo
