On 12/12/05, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Noone wrote:
So how does one go about separating hidden head content and body
content?
I mean, what happens to meta tags, page title, scripting functions
etc.?
Nothing much - just business as usual. Elements that matters are
okay, hi everyone: a short question, i intend it to be, at least.
is i (italic) deprecated in xhtml? and even better, could someone
point me to a w3c page that talks about what is deprecated in xhtml?
and, second part of that, why does the validator validate it if it is
deprecated.
many
On 12/11/05, Donna Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
okay, hi everyone: a short question, i intend it to be, at least.
is i (italic) deprecated in xhtml? and even better, could someone
point me to a w3c page that talks about what is deprecated in xhtml?
and, second part of that, why does the
G'day
is i (italic) deprecated in xhtml? and even better, could someone
point me to a w3c page that talks about what is deprecated in xhtml?
XHTML 1.0 is a reformulation of HTML4.01, in which i is not
deprecated. However, when talking about font style elements,
the spec says:
okay, hi everyone: a short question, i intend it to be, at least.
is i (italic) deprecated in xhtml? and even better, could someone
point me to a w3c page that talks about what is deprecated in xhtml?
and, second part of that, why does the validator validate it if it is
deprecated.
A good
Donna Jones wrote:
is i (italic) deprecated in xhtml? and even better, could someone
point me to a w3c page that talks about what is deprecated in xhtml?
Use the HTML 4.01 specification as guide...
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/
...as the same elements are allowed/deprecated in xhtml 1.0.
Of russ - maxdesign
Sent: Monday, 12 December 2005 4:18 PM
To: Web Standards Group
Subject: Re: [WSG] italic and validator
okay, hi everyone: a short question, i intend it to be, at least.
is i (italic) deprecated in xhtml? and even better, could someone
point me to a w3c page that talks
G'day
Paul Noone wrote:
But now I find myself confused by a couple of the elements listed as
optional (O); namely the HEAD and BODY tags. Optional?
Good question, especially when the same document says:
Every HTML document must have a TITLE element in the HEAD
section. Can TITLE be placed
On 12/12/05, Paul Noone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for that, Russ. I hadn't come across that neat chart before. Handy
reference.
But now I find myself confused by a couple of the elements listed as
optional (O); namely the HEAD and BODY tags. Optional?
Yep. Few people know this. try it
something again and this simply requires further
reading on my part.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Christian Montoya
Sent: Monday, 12 December 2005 4:52 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] italic and validator
On 12/12/05
On 12/12/05, Bert Doorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm, so (to go along with the Google debate), we can save more
bandwidth by omitting html, head and body? Interesting.
Indeed, and Rimantas did just that in his version:
http://rimantas.com/bits/google/google.html
I'm slightly wary of doing
just want to say *thanks* you guys came through and fast!
my situation is working for an agency that wants/needs to italicize
everything and their sister. i have been using the i. i've also been
writing in html4.01 and actually plan on staying there. But, for a
drill i made a xhtml1.0
Donna Jones wrote:
is i (italic) deprecated in xhtml?
No. Also, deprecated elements appear in Transitional DTDs, but not in
Strict DTDs. This applies to both HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0. It does not
apply to XHTML 1.1, which contains mostly the same elements and
attributes as XHTML 1.0 but
Paul Noone wrote:
So how does one go about separating hidden head content and body
content?
I mean, what happens to meta tags, page title, scripting functions
etc.?
Nothing much - just business as usual. Elements that matters are implied
in HTML browsers. That's why they are listed as
14 matches
Mail list logo
