Re: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility

2005-12-05 Thread L. Robinson

Michael Donnermeyer wrote:
TextPattern works well, particularly now that they've released a  final 
version.  I used WordPress up until v.1.5 due to TXP being in  beta and 
RC versions, but have since slowly switched to TXP for all  my sites.  
The only site I can think of at the moment that is running  TXP (and 
doing a good job of it) is Hicks Design (http:// 
www.hicksdesign.co.uk/).  I'm sure there's more out there, just can't  
think of them right now.




A few other sites using Textpattern: http://txpmagazine.kbbu.de/all_sites/

lr
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility

2005-12-02 Thread Geoff Deering

Lloyd wrote:


Guys,

Thanks for all the feedback! Backend is important as one of our
content providers is blind. Does anyone know much more about Joomla?
They are possibly prepared to upgrade (As they see this is just the
same thing). I want to know whether its possible to do this with
either Mambo or Joomla but I guess otherwise it will need be something
else so your suggestions of other good CMS's are welcome!

Thanks again.

Regards,

Lloyd

 



Just as a point of interest, Mambo, before it split into Joomla, said 
that the next major release (5.x) would aim to generate web standard 
compliant code, they had taken on board as a core developer the 
person/people who takes Mambo, and fixes it to produce XMambo 
(http://mamboforge.net/projects/xmambo/).  I don't think that will 
happen of itself, and will need web standards developers to work with 
the various teams to provide feedback.  I don't know what has happened 
with these initiatives since the Mambo/Joomla split.


The Typo3 people have said the same thing about Typo3 V4.x, which is in 
alpha 
(http://typo3.org/?tx_newsimporter_pi1%5BshowItem%5D=0cHash=e4a40a11a9).  
Again, it will require web standard developers to work with them on that.


So I think there's the opportunity to work with and provide feedback to 
bring these products up to a standard where we can maybe*enjoy* good web 
content management tools.


--
Geoff Deering
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility

2005-12-02 Thread Rakesh Patil
Plz dont send me any mail onword..
otherwise i'll.!!1
On 12/1/05, Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys,I have been asked to work on a web site and Mambo is the current CMSbeing used. They want to, if possible, keep Mambo as they're CMS but
upon inspecting it I am surrounded by tables and poor markup. It doesnot even seem possible (Without hacking the source) to add ALT text tosome images!Is there a way to make Mambo compatible (A large reason for the work
is to allow blind users to get value from the site) with accessiblilyand hopefully web standards?Is there another CMS that you would mention which may suit my needs?Regards,Lloyd**
The discussion list forhttp://webstandardsgroup.org/See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help**


Re: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility

2005-12-02 Thread David Nicol
Hi all,

Weused Textpattern for http://www.bustahouse.com/and http://www.selfcateringshetland.com/

It's a really nice solution for putting together sites. My main concern with Textpattern is teaching clients how to use it, as the sections/categories model is sometimes a little tricky for them to understand.


That said, teaching a client to use Mambo is not the easiest job in the world either ... clients are always initimidated by the number of steps involved to add a new page: create the page, make sure the correct menu is displayed on the page and also make sure the page is linked to from the correct menus ... and so on.


Cheers
David


On 12/2/05, Rakesh Patil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Plz dont send me any mail onword..
otherwise i'll.!!1
On 12/1/05, Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote: 
Hi Guys,I have been asked to work on a web site and Mambo is the current CMSbeing used. They want to, if possible, keep Mambo as they're CMS but 
upon inspecting it I am surrounded by tables and poor markup. It doesnot even seem possible (Without hacking the source) to add ALT text tosome images!Is there a way to make Mambo compatible (A large reason for the work 
is to allow blind users to get value from the site) with accessiblilyand hopefully web standards?Is there another CMS that you would mention which may suit my needs?Regards,Lloyd
** The discussion list forhttp://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility

2005-12-01 Thread Bruce
I gave up trying to do anything with Mambo.
Expression Engine, Movable Type, and Wordpress are Standards based and
simple and easy to configure, All three validate out of the box and don't
require a two year course and beating your head on the desk to
reconfigureafter several years of trying to use other systems I gave
Mambo and all nuke related  up as a lost cause.

Bruce Prochnau
BKDesign Solutions

- Original Message - 
From: Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 7:15 AM
Subject: [WSG] Mambo  Accessibility


Hi Guys,

I have been asked to work on a web site and Mambo is the current CMS
being used. They want to, if possible, keep Mambo as they're CMS but
upon inspecting it I am surrounded by tables and poor markup. It does
not even seem possible (Without hacking the source) to add ALT text to
some images!

Is there a way to make Mambo compatible (A large reason for the work
is to allow blind users to get value from the site) with accessiblily
and hopefully web standards?

Is there another CMS that you would mention which may suit my needs?

Regards,

Lloyd
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility

2005-12-01 Thread Bruce
Woops, missed this:
If Mambo can be configured easy, as some claim, why has there not been a ton
of templates available long ago??? On different CMS type forums I see
problems mambo related all the time...

Nuff said ;-)

Bruce Prochnau
BKDesign Solutions

- Original Message - 
From: Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 7:15 AM
Subject: [WSG] Mambo  Accessibility


Hi Guys,

I have been asked to work on a web site and Mambo is the current CMS
being used. They want to, if possible, keep Mambo as they're CMS but
upon inspecting it I am surrounded by tables and poor markup. It does
not even seem possible (Without hacking the source) to add ALT text to
some images!

Is there a way to make Mambo compatible (A large reason for the work
is to allow blind users to get value from the site) with accessiblily
and hopefully web standards?

Is there another CMS that you would mention which may suit my needs?

Regards,

Lloyd
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility

2005-12-01 Thread Carlos Revillo
I used mambo to do this... www.jabary.com

Carlos Revillo
Tanta Tecnología y Comunicación
Grupo Onetec
c/ Julián Camarillo 26 1º Of. 2
28037 Madrid
Tel.: 91.440.10.40
Fax: 91.304.91.24
www.tantacom.com
www.grupoonetec.com


-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En
nombre de Bruce
Enviado el: jueves, 01 de diciembre de 2005 13:26
Para: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Asunto: Re: [WSG] Mambo  Accessibility

Woops, missed this:
If Mambo can be configured easy, as some claim, why has there not been a ton
of templates available long ago??? On different CMS type forums I see
problems mambo related all the time...

Nuff said ;-)

Bruce Prochnau
BKDesign Solutions

- Original Message - 
From: Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 7:15 AM
Subject: [WSG] Mambo  Accessibility


Hi Guys,

I have been asked to work on a web site and Mambo is the current CMS
being used. They want to, if possible, keep Mambo as they're CMS but
upon inspecting it I am surrounded by tables and poor markup. It does
not even seem possible (Without hacking the source) to add ALT text to
some images!

Is there a way to make Mambo compatible (A large reason for the work
is to allow blind users to get value from the site) with accessiblily
and hopefully web standards?

Is there another CMS that you would mention which may suit my needs?

Regards,

Lloyd
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility

2005-12-01 Thread Justin Thorp
I am a big fan of Wordpress [1].  I personally use it, as well as use it on a lot of projects for clients.  I have found it very easy to configure.  If you know a HTML and a little PHP, it is very versatile.For one project, I was tasked with taking a look at the accessibility of Mambo and the feasibility of making it accessible.  After going over the documentation, it just felt very daunting.You may want to check out the W3C's Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines (ATAG) [2].  It is a good measuring stick for quality in a CMS (or any authoring tool) as far as it's ability to be accessible.  You can ask the CMS vendors how they measure up to ATAG.Sincerely,Justin Thorp[1] http://www.wordpress.org[2] http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/atag.phpOn Dec 1, 2005, at 7:23 AM, Bruce wrote:I gave up trying to do anything with Mambo._expression_ Engine, Movable Type, and Wordpress are Standards based andsimple and easy to configure, All three validate out of the box and don'trequire a two year course and beating your head on the desk toreconfigureafter several years of trying to use other systems I gaveMambo and all nuke related  up as a lost cause.Bruce ProchnauBKDesign Solutions- Original Message - From: "Lloyd" [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 7:15 AMSubject: [WSG] Mambo  AccessibilityHi Guys,I have been asked to work on a web site and Mambo is the current CMSbeing used. They want to, if possible, keep Mambo as they're CMS butupon inspecting it I am surrounded by tables and poor markup. It doesnot even seem possible (Without hacking the source) to add ALT text tosome images!Is there a way to make Mambo compatible (A large reason for the workis to allow blind users to get value from the site) with accessiblilyand hopefully web standards?Is there another CMS that you would mention which may suit my needs?Regards,Lloyd  *** Justin Thorp  Technical Assistant Michigan State University Academic Computing  Network Services - Applications Programming http://approg.msu.edu/  Principal; Web Developer  Accessibility Specialist MyCapitalWeb.com LLC 3016 S. Deerfield Lansing, MI 48911 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  my NEW personal blog - http://www.justinthorp.com my web development blog - http://thinkthentype.blogspot.com  

Re: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility

2005-12-01 Thread Steve Ferguson

On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:15:13 +0800
 Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi Guys,

...

Is there a way to make Mambo compatible (A large reason 
for the work
is to allow blind users to get value from the site) with 
accessiblily

and hopefully web standards?

Is there another CMS that you would mention which may 
suit my needs?




I've never used it myself, but you might want to take a 
look at Joomla. It's compatible with Mambo at this point 
http://www.joomla.org/index.php?Itemid=44option=com_faqcatid=7 
and the developers are at least are trying to be compliant 
and accessible 
http://help.joomla.org/content/view/805/125/


Cheers,
Steve Ferguson - http://illumit.com/


Regards,

Lloyd
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility

2005-12-01 Thread Neal Watkins

What about www.textpattern.com

has anyone tried this?

~n

uoting Steve Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:15:13 +0800
 Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi Guys,

...

Is there a way to make Mambo compatible (A large reason for the work
is to allow blind users to get value from the site) with accessiblily
and hopefully web standards?

Is there another CMS that you would mention which may suit my needs?



I've never used it myself, but you might want to take a look at 
Joomla. It's compatible with Mambo at this point 
http://www.joomla.org/index.php?Itemid=44option=com_faqcatid=7 and 
the developers are at least are trying to be compliant and accessible 
http://help.joomla.org/content/view/805/125/


Cheers,
Steve Ferguson - http://illumit.com/


Regards,

Lloyd
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**







Neal Watkins
www.constructweb.com

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility

2005-12-01 Thread Ted Drake
www.GAWDS.org (Guild of Accessible Web Developers) has a fully accessible
CMS platform.  I would recommend moving away from Mambo if you are
interested in standards.
Ted


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Steve Ferguson
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 8:35 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Mambo  Accessibility

On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:15:13 +0800
  Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Guys,
 
...

 Is there a way to make Mambo compatible (A large reason 
for the work
 is to allow blind users to get value from the site) with 
accessiblily
 and hopefully web standards?
 
 Is there another CMS that you would mention which may 
suit my needs?


I've never used it myself, but you might want to take a 
look at Joomla. It's compatible with Mambo at this point 
http://www.joomla.org/index.php?Itemid=44option=com_faqcatid=7 
and the developers are at least are trying to be compliant 
and accessible 
 http://help.joomla.org/content/view/805/125/

Cheers,
Steve Ferguson - http://illumit.com/

 Regards,
 
 Lloyd
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility

2005-12-01 Thread Michael Donnermeyer
TextPattern works well, particularly now that they've released a  
final version.  I used WordPress up until v.1.5 due to TXP being in  
beta and RC versions, but have since slowly switched to TXP for all  
my sites.  The only site I can think of at the moment that is running  
TXP (and doing a good job of it) is Hicks Design (http:// 
www.hicksdesign.co.uk/).  I'm sure there's more out there, just can't  
think of them right now.



On Dec 1, 2005, at 11:00 AM, Neal Watkins wrote:


What about www.textpattern.com

has anyone tried this?

~n

uoting Steve Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:



On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:15:13 +0800
 Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi Guys,

...

Is there a way to make Mambo compatible (A large reason for the work
is to allow blind users to get value from the site) with  
accessiblily

and hopefully web standards?

Is there another CMS that you would mention which may suit my needs?




I've never used it myself, but you might want to take a look at  
Joomla. It's compatible with Mambo at this point http:// 
www.joomla.org/index.php?Itemid=44option=com_faqcatid=7 and the  
developers are at least are trying to be compliant and accessible  
http://help.joomla.org/content/view/805/125/


Cheers,
Steve Ferguson - http://illumit.com/



Regards,

Lloyd
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**




**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**








Neal Watkins
www.constructweb.com

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**




**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility

2005-12-01 Thread Terrence Wood
Lloyd said:
 Is there a way to make Mambo compatible (A large reason for the work
 is to allow blind users to get value from the site) with accessiblily
 and hopefully web standards?

Are you refering to the the CMS interface itself (i.e. the admin bits) or
to the public facing output?

Most CMS's should be able to handle producing accessible public facing pages.

If you are looking for an accessible backend, I'm sorry but you won't find
one out of the box. Your best solution is to look to a CMS that has good
sepeartion of code and UI  - preferably where the admin pages are
themeable - and build your own backend, or work with an OS project that
has accessiblity as a goal for the backend.

One of the blogging platforms (WordPress, MovableType, TextPattern) might
suffice depending on how much 'managing' and how scalable your CMS needs
to be, however, last I looked none of these are particularly accessible
out of the box either, and all suffered to some degree of poor seperation
of code + ui (disclaimer: it's been a very long time since I looked at TP,
or MT).

kind regards
Terrence Wood.





**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility

2005-12-01 Thread Paul Noone
Except that they still insist on membership before you can view such pages. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ted Drake
Sent: Friday, 2 December 2005 4:15 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Mambo  Accessibility

www.GAWDS.org (Guild of Accessible Web Developers) has a fully accessible
CMS platform.  I would recommend moving away from Mambo if you are
interested in standards.
Ted


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Steve Ferguson
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 8:35 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Mambo  Accessibility

On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:15:13 +0800
  Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Guys,
 
...

 Is there a way to make Mambo compatible (A large reason for the work  
is to allow blind users to get value from the site) with accessiblily  
and hopefully web standards?
 
 Is there another CMS that you would mention which may suit my needs?


I've never used it myself, but you might want to take a look at Joomla. It's
compatible with Mambo at this point
http://www.joomla.org/index.php?Itemid=44option=com_faqcatid=7
and the developers are at least are trying to be compliant and accessible
http://help.joomla.org/content/view/805/125/

Cheers,
Steve Ferguson - http://illumit.com/

 Regards,
 
 Lloyd
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility

2005-12-01 Thread Christian Montoya
If you want to find out which CMS is good for your needs, you might
want to check out:

http://www.opensourcecms.com/

They have live installs of maybe hundreds of CMS, all rated, user
comments, organized in categories. The installs are wiped every 2
hours, so you can go in with the demo password and do whatever you
want, try different features, see the output, etc. You might find a
CMS no one would think of suggesting that might actually be perfect
for you, and you don't have to worry about installing something on
your own server and having to uninstall it later.

To save you some time, most comments about Mambo on the site go along
the lines of Mambo was good for a while, but there are better
solutions now that will save you lots of time. It might be faster to
take the Mambo database and port it into another CMS than try to make
all the Mambo markup standards-compliant.

--
--
Christian Montoya
christianmontoya.com ... rdpdesign.com ... cssliquid.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility

2005-12-01 Thread Paul Noone
You can also directly compare hundreds of CMSs and choose them based on
selection criteria from this helpful site: http://cmsmatrix.org

However, if you're after a simplt, straight-forward no-nonsense, accessible
and XHTML compliant CMS I'm going to recommend CMS Made Simple again. It's
in it's infancy but it's got the most active developer community I've ever
seend and it's growing out of site(sic).

And, no, I have no affiliations beyond those of an emotive nature. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Christian Montoya
Sent: Friday, 2 December 2005 8:47 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Mambo  Accessibility

If you want to find out which CMS is good for your needs, you might want to
check out:

http://www.opensourcecms.com/

They have live installs of maybe hundreds of CMS, all rated, user comments,
organized in categories. The installs are wiped every 2 hours, so you can go
in with the demo password and do whatever you want, try different features,
see the output, etc. You might find a CMS no one would think of suggesting
that might actually be perfect for you, and you don't have to worry about
installing something on your own server and having to uninstall it later.

To save you some time, most comments about Mambo on the site go along the
lines of Mambo was good for a while, but there are better solutions now
that will save you lots of time. It might be faster to take the Mambo
database and port it into another CMS than try to make all the Mambo markup
standards-compliant.

--
--
Christian Montoya
christianmontoya.com ... rdpdesign.com ... cssliquid.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility

2005-12-01 Thread Michael Donnermeyer
Actually you can find it, if you take the time to look.  Here's the  
link for non-members (sourced from their Membership Benefits page).


http://www.qnecms.co.uk/


On Dec 1, 2005, at 3:36 PM, Paul Noone wrote:

Except that they still insist on membership before you can view  
such pages.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Behalf Of Ted Drake
Sent: Friday, 2 December 2005 4:15 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Mambo  Accessibility

www.GAWDS.org (Guild of Accessible Web Developers) has a fully  
accessible

CMS platform.  I would recommend moving away from Mambo if you are
interested in standards.
Ted


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Behalf Of Steve Ferguson
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 8:35 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Mambo  Accessibility

On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:15:13 +0800
  Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi Guys,

...

Is there a way to make Mambo compatible (A large reason for the work
is to allow blind users to get value from the site) with accessiblily
and hopefully web standards?

Is there another CMS that you would mention which may suit my needs?




I've never used it myself, but you might want to take a look at  
Joomla. It's

compatible with Mambo at this point
http://www.joomla.org/index.php?Itemid=44option=com_faqcatid=7
and the developers are at least are trying to be compliant and  
accessible

http://help.joomla.org/content/view/805/125/

Cheers,
Steve Ferguson - http://illumit.com/



Regards,

Lloyd
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**




**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**




**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility

2005-12-01 Thread absalom
 I've never used it myself, but you might want to take a 
 look at Joomla. It's compatible with Mambo at this point 
 http://www.joomla.org/index.php?Itemid=44option=com_faqcatid=7 
 and the developers are at least are trying to be compliant 
 and accessible 
  http://help.joomla.org/content/view/805/125/
 
 Cheers,
 Steve Ferguson - http://illumit.com/

Areas that Joomla is dealing with:
1) Frontend and backend accessibility considerations
2) Well formed, semantic code. Minimal cruft.
3) Appropriate use of markup
4) Design standards (e.g. looking at W3C Core Styles, what classes we really
need, correct use of classes)

I say this as part of the Usability and Accessibility Group within Joomla.
Whilst I'm not the actual core dev team, I have been helping out with ideas and
code architecture.

Joomla is going in the right direction. It's just not there yet..;)

Lawrence Meckan
Absalom Media
http:///www.absalom.biz
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility

2005-12-01 Thread Paul Noone

Michael Donnermeyer deftly quothed:

 ...if you take the time to look.

Ahem. Yes. Thank you, Michael. :*

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility

2005-12-01 Thread Vladimir Yashnikov
Hello Michael, 

  I used WordPress up until v.1.5 due to TXP being in  
 beta and RC versions, but have since slowly switched to TXP for all  
 my sites.  The only site I can think of at the moment that is running  
 TXP (and doing a good job of it) is Hicks Design (http:// 
 www.hicksdesign.co.uk/).  I'm sure there's more out there, just can't  
 think of them right now.

There are a lot of sites on TXP: http://txpmagazine.kbbu.de/all_sites/

-- 
Vladimir Yashnikov
http://www.yashnikov.info/
  

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility

2005-12-01 Thread Lloyd
Guys,

Thanks for all the feedback! Backend is important as one of our
content providers is blind. Does anyone know much more about Joomla?
They are possibly prepared to upgrade (As they see this is just the
same thing). I want to know whether its possible to do this with
either Mambo or Joomla but I guess otherwise it will need be something
else so your suggestions of other good CMS's are welcome!

Thanks again.

Regards,

Lloyd

On 12/2/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I've never used it myself, but you might want to take a
  look at Joomla. It's compatible with Mambo at this point
  http://www.joomla.org/index.php?Itemid=44option=com_faqcatid=7
  and the developers are at least are trying to be compliant
  and accessible
   http://help.joomla.org/content/view/805/125/
 
  Cheers,
  Steve Ferguson - http://illumit.com/

 Areas that Joomla is dealing with:
 1) Frontend and backend accessibility considerations
 2) Well formed, semantic code. Minimal cruft.
 3) Appropriate use of markup
 4) Design standards (e.g. looking at W3C Core Styles, what classes we really
 need, correct use of classes)

 I say this as part of the Usability and Accessibility Group within Joomla.
 Whilst I'm not the actual core dev team, I have been helping out with ideas 
 and
 code architecture.

 Joomla is going in the right direction. It's just not there yet..;)

 Lawrence Meckan
 Absalom Media
 http:///www.absalom.biz
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**