Re: [WSG] The weirdest IE bug I've ever encountered.

2009-06-04 Thread Rimantas Liubertas
Then perhaps you would care to explain why this document: http://zenpsycho.com/quirkstest2.htm activates standards mode, when the table you've linked to suggests that it should be in quirks mode? Table clearly shows, that this page should activate standards mode. It is the last line,

Re: [WSG] The weirdest IE bug I've ever encountered.

2009-06-03 Thread Joseph Taylor
I took a look at your source code - there are a whole bunch of issues beginning with oddities in your HTML - things like: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN http://www.w3c.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/loose.dtd; HTML lang=en xml:lang=en

RE: [WSG] The weirdest IE bug I've ever encountered.

2009-06-03 Thread Essential eBiz Solutions
June 2009 02:38 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] The weirdest IE bug I've ever encountered. I took a look at your source code - there are a whole bunch of issues beginning with oddities in your HTML - things like: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN http

RE: [WSG] The weirdest IE bug I've ever encountered.

2009-06-03 Thread Steve Green
@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] The weirdest IE bug I've ever encountered. Joe is right, you got alot of tags unclosed and you're switch from HTML to XHTML style tags. Pick one, and use the validator! You'll see a pretty much bug free site in no time. _ From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org

Re: [WSG] The weirdest IE bug I've ever encountered.

2009-06-03 Thread Breton Slivka
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Joseph Taylor j...@sitesbyjoe.com wrote: I took a look at your source code - there are a whole bunch of issues beginning with oddities in your HTML - things like: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN

RE: [WSG] The weirdest IE bug I've ever encountered.

2009-06-03 Thread Kepler Gelotte
On that page, you will see an italic letter v on the left hand side of the screen, and a view cart link on the right hand side which is NOT clickable, but which should be clickable. The issue does not seem to be related to standards. I cleaned up the code and the problem persists. The cause is

Re: [WSG] The weirdest IE bug I've ever encountered.

2009-06-03 Thread Breton Slivka
I see I have still not conviced you of the weirdness of this bug. I've updated my version to have a 1px border, and more items in the list, which are NOT covered by the P element. None of them are clickable, disconfirming your conclusions. On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Kepler Gelotte

Re: [WSG] The weirdest IE bug I've ever encountered.

2009-06-03 Thread Robert Turner
Try adding borders to all block level elements (ie. p, div etc). Firebug does this for you in Firefox, but you'll need to do it manually for IE. To make it much more obvious, set a background color too (eg. p, div {background-color: #00f;} ). If there are unclickable links then chances are

Re: [WSG] The weirdest IE bug I've ever encountered.

2009-06-03 Thread Robert Turner
Sorry, I misread your message, looks like this is not the problem. Please disregard. Robert Turner wrote: Try adding borders to all block level elements (ie. p, div etc). Firebug does this for you in Firefox, but you'll need to do it manually for IE. To make it much more obvious, set a

Re: [WSG] The weirdest IE bug I've ever encountered.

2009-06-03 Thread Robert Turner
Dropping the DOCTYPE declaration appears to fix it... Breton Slivka wrote: I see I have still not conviced you of the weirdness of this bug. I've updated my version to have a 1px border, and more items in the list, which are NOT covered by the P element. None of them are clickable,

Re: [WSG] The weirdest IE bug I've ever encountered.

2009-06-03 Thread Rimantas Liubertas
I'm pretty sure the well observed and documented behavior of IE is that WHICH doctype makes absolutely not a lick of difference at all. This is not correct. The only thing it looks for is the string !doctype at the beginning of the document, which decides whether it goes into quirksmode or

Re: [WSG] The weirdest IE bug I've ever encountered.

2009-06-03 Thread Breton Slivka
Then perhaps you would care to explain why this document: http://zenpsycho.com/quirkstest2.htm activates standards mode, when the table you've linked to suggests that it should be in quirks mode? for comparison, here's a typical html 4.0 strict doctype: http://zenpsycho.com/quirkstest1.htm I

RE: [WSG] The weirdest IE bug I've ever encountered.

2009-06-03 Thread Kepler Gelotte
I see I have still not conviced you of the weirdness of this bug. I've updated my version to have a 1px border, and more items in the list, which are NOT covered by the P element. None of them are clickable, disconfirming your conclusions. Actually, I was agreeing with you that it is a bug.

Re: [WSG] The weirdest IE bug I've ever encountered.

2009-06-03 Thread Breton Slivka
So you think that there's an invisible part to the paragraph that is not outlined by the border? Kind of makes the border 1px approach to development kind of useless in IE in the face of behavior like this, don't you think? But I still don't think this idea quite matches up. In the broken version,

Re: [WSG] The weirdest IE bug I've ever encountered.

2009-06-03 Thread Breton Slivka
To counter my point and support yours though, setting a width on the P tag also makes the elements clickable. Which does seem to suggest that the P tag extends vertically down further than its border suggests it does. On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Breton Slivka z...@zenpsycho.com wrote: So you