Re: [WSG] Federal Court hearing re Virgin Blue website accessiblity

2009-01-20 Thread Nick Cowie
Chris, thanks for bringing it to my attention, I did not know about the up
coming court case.

I have seen a letter Mr Kerr sent a company regarding an inaccessible
website:
http://forums.port80.asn.au/showthread.php?t=12018#6
and received and replied to email Mr Kerr sent as a response to my forum
comment. Apparently I have a different opinion from Mr Kerr on what makes a
web site accessible under the Disabilities Discrimination Act.

It should be an interesting case and I am looking forward to the results.
This will be very different from Maguire vs SOCOG as it is in the Federal
Magristrates Court not the Human Rights Commission. I hope that Mr Kerr's
legal team have more than Mr Kerr and a letter from HREOC on their side.
Because if I was Virgin Blue, I would have a couple of experts from Vision
Australia and a couple of screen reader users to tell/show how they can book
tickets via Virgin Blue's website (ala the Target defense last year in the
US).


-- 
Nick Cowie
http://nickcowie.com


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] Federal Court hearing re Virgin Blue website accessiblity

2009-01-20 Thread Matthew Pennell
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Nick Cowie cowie.n...@gmail.com wrote:

 Apparently I have a different opinion from Mr Kerr on what makes a web site
 accessible under the Disabilities Discrimination Act.


Care to expand on that point? Do his views jibe with what most web
developers would consider 'accessible'?

- Matthew


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] Federal Court hearing re Virgin Blue website accessiblity

2009-01-20 Thread Nick Cowie
2009/1/20 Matthew Pennell matthewpenn...@gmail.com

 On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Nick Cowie cowie.n...@gmail.com wrote:

 Apparently I have a different opinion from Mr Kerr on what makes a web
 site accessible under the Disabilities Discrimination Act.


 Care to expand on that point? Do his views jibe with what most web
 developers would consider 'accessible'?

 From Mr Kerr's original  letter, his opinion appears to that the WCAG 1.0
guidelines priority level 1, 2 and 3 are the be all and end all of
accessibility, particularly with regard to the DDA.

I take a far more pragmatic approach, particularly when it comes to the 10
year WCAG 1.0 and a number of the priority 3 guidelines that are more likely
to make a site inaccessible than accessible. http://wcagsamurai.org/

Personally I find both WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0 to be lacking when it comes to
language related disabilities. Both for people with cognitive impairments
and those with english as second language, for example people with hearing
impairment whose primary language is sign language.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] Federal Court hearing re Virgin Blue website accessiblity

2009-01-19 Thread Seona Bellamy
2009/1/20 Chris Dimmock chris.dimm...@gmail.com:
 Did anyone else see this??

 http://www.propellerglobal.com/news/News/128/virgin-blue-to-court-again-for-discrimination

 http://www.theage.com.au/travel/virgin-blue-in-court-over-website-20090119-7kc1.html

 Been a while since SOCOG..

Yes, this one went around the office since apparently this guy tried
poking some websites managed by one of our sister-companies.

It will be interesting to see how this one fares in the courts, given
that there is now a precedent. Not sure if the fact that Virgin Blue
say they have already been working with and getting advice from Vision
Australia on this matter will make a difference in their favour or
not, either.

I just can't get over the fact that he seems to have nothing better to
do that patrol the web looking for accessibility offenders (over 30,00
sites??!!). Someone really needs to get out more...

~Seona


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***