Re: [WSG] Help needed

2007-05-11 Thread Nick Fitzsimons
On 11 May 2007, at 05:52:58, John Faulds wrote: You really only need a dimension on the anchors to overcome an IE/ Windows bug when they're set to display: block so you can either use * html #nav a { height: 1% } or conditional comments. You can probably ignore my other comment about the

Re: [WSG] Help needed

2007-05-10 Thread John Faulds
1. In the lefthand nav I would have liked to have some of the 2nd level Œlink¹s not links. But my code is up the creek and I can¹t make them line up or be the same font size unless they¹re all links. Any clues on what I¹m doing wrong here? Are these IE problems? If so, it's because the

Re: [WSG] Help needed

2007-05-10 Thread Susie Gardner-Brown
On 11/5/07 12:30 PM, John Faulds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. In the lefthand nav I would have liked to have some of the 2nd level Œlink¹s not links. But my code is up the creek and I can¹t make them line up or be the same font size unless they¹re all links. Any clues on what I¹m doing

Re: [WSG] Help needed

2007-05-10 Thread John Faulds
Can't help you with your Mac problems, I can only tell you what I see in Windows (and the suggested fixes will still apply), but for the footer problem, remove */ from just above /* FOOTER STYLE */ - it's closing a comment that's not opened. On Fri, 11 May 2007 13:00:49 +1000, Susie

Re: [WSG] Help needed

2007-05-10 Thread Susie Gardner-Brown
Thanks John. I found the errant */ and the footer is working as it should, so thanks for that. I don't know where my brain is this afternoon - frozen up I think! Would you mind explaining what the fixes actually are? If I give the anchor (link) styles a width, I'm not clear how to do that and

Re: [WSG] Help needed

2007-05-10 Thread John Faulds
You really only need a dimension on the anchors to overcome an IE/Windows bug when they're set to display: block so you can either use * html #nav a { height: 1% } or conditional comments. You can probably ignore my other comment about the hasLayout issue because I assumed it was an IE

Re: [WSG] Help needed with IE drama...

2005-11-03 Thread Darren Wood
We've worked out that the issue was caused by the comments in the HTML file. Has anyone had this sort of issue before? If there a solution other then removing the comments? Cheers D On 11/4/05, Darren Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello fellow standardites, I'm losing hair over a very

Re: [WSG] Help needed with IE drama...

2005-11-03 Thread Andy Kirkwood|Motive
Hi Darren, I haven't reviewed the bug, however if its anything like the issue we've come across with comments [1] then you could try an alternative method of commenting the code. (This goes somewhat to the concept of semantic markup also.) Rather than: !-- begin footer -- div id=footer ...

RE: [WSG] Help needed with IE drama...

2005-11-03 Thread Adam Burmister \(DSL AK\)
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Kirkwood|Motive Sent: Friday, 4 November 2005 3:53 p.m. To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Help needed with IE drama... Hi Darren, I haven't reviewed the bug, however if its anything like the issue we've come