Re: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

2004-11-26 Thread Kay Smoljak
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 15:57:29 +0800, Vicki Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I rarely even mention web standards to clients anymore unless they are snip Amen! -- Kay Smoljak http://kay.smoljak.com/ ** The discussion list for

Re: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

2004-11-26 Thread Andy Budd
Regarding charging - like anything, the more experienced you get the faster you get so it's a bit silly to charge across a project on the basis of time spent. I agree with pretty much everything you've said apart from this. Firstly I don't necessarily think that the more experienced you are the

Re: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

2004-11-26 Thread Vicki Berry
Oh I'm with you there, Andy! I realised after I sent that email that I could have put that better. I agree that the rate you charge is in many ways a reflection of your knowledge and experience, and that knowledge and experience can lead you to put in more effort in some ways. I still think,

RE: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

2004-11-25 Thread Brett Walsh
Searching for s2store in google returns it as the first result? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kristof Rutten Sent: Thursday, 25 November 2004 8:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and

Re: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

2004-11-25 Thread Andy Budd
Kristof Rutten wrote: How do you convince your client to spend a little more on the design, the coding and the usability  when the most simple logic doesn't work ? Remember that most clients don't care a jot about accessibility and web standards. Sell them on the business benefits. However if

RE: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

2004-11-25 Thread Kristof Rutten
products just had 15 links on a search engine? And Google is the most active of'm all. .K From: Brett Walsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: donderdag 25 november 2004 10:40To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument

Re: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

2004-11-25 Thread john
As I'm just now starting to use web standards in my business, and haven't had to yet make the sales pitch, these are just some random thoughts. Why would we have to sell the idea of web standards? Why not just use them? Sell your services like usual, and use all the tools you know to create

RE: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

2004-11-25 Thread Kristof Rutten
] Sent: donderdag 25 november 2004 11:00 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument. As I'm just now starting to use web standards in my business, and haven't had to yet make the sales pitch, these are just some random

Re: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

2004-11-25 Thread Manuel González Noriega
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:06:51 +0100, Kristof Rutten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I totally agree. But then it comes to budget. And your clients ASKS why your offer is quoted higher. Then you have the explaining to do. I don't really get why your quote should be higher and don't really like that

Re: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

2004-11-25 Thread john
- From: john [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: donderdag 25 november 2004 11:00 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument. As I'm just now starting to use web standards in my business, and haven't had to yet make the sales

Re: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

2004-11-25 Thread john
on 11/25/2004 10:18 AM Bert Doorn said the following: It's also frustrating to get emails with microscopic text... heh...I didn't notice that myself, since I have HTML turned off in Thunderbird. ~john _ Dr. Zeus Web Development http://www.DrZeus.net content without

RE: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

2004-11-25 Thread Lea de Groot
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 20:40:10 +1100, Brett Walsh wrote: Searching for s2store in google returns it as the first result.? No, the point is that there are no descriptions to entice the searcher to click on that link and that of the many, many pages on the site (have a look - its a fair sized

Re: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

2004-11-25 Thread Andy Budd
john wrote: I'm not sure I understand why it would cost more to use web standards. Even if it did on the design and build, it would surely even out once maintenance costs were factored in. The problem isn't web standards or not web standards, the problem seems to be quality vs cost. If you do

Re: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

2004-11-25 Thread Mordechai Peller
Bert Doorn wrote: It's also frustrating to get emails with microscopic text (accessibility issue). Text/plain please? Both Thunderbird and Firefox allow you to set the minimum font size. Accessibility fighting back! As far as your dilemma goes - don't lower your standards (pun intended) for

Re: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

2004-11-25 Thread Terrence Wood
Warning my response is long and perhaps rambles a bit -- there are the beginnings of some nice ideas but it's lacking polish - I'm tired. When I pitch for a site I don't talk about web standards and accessibility per se - these are just methodologies I use to deliver results. Web standards and

Re: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

2004-11-25 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Terrence Wood wrote: When I pitch for a site I don't talk about web standards and accessibility per se - these are just methodologies I use to deliver results. Web standards and accessibility are invisible to the untrained eye. I always liken this to something like the construction industry: if

Re: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

2004-11-25 Thread Terrence Wood
Patrick you are right -- in and of itself flash satay doesn't improve accessibility. But using the object tag properly does - which is what the satay method uses (I use a variation with IE comments). Example (accessible image map, but same principles apply):

Re: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

2004-11-25 Thread Chris Stratford
Something I think you all are missing is that you have taken time to learn about standards and accessibility. I think I can charge more for my services because I have more knowledge about standards. So for me the price may be more expensive - but they are paying for my knowledege and experience

Re: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

2004-11-25 Thread Terrence Wood
Yes, that is a good point, and is what I was getting at earlier: you really need to tell the story of why your 'expensive' design is so much better than you competitors cheap design There is a joke (loosely paraphrased) about the plumber kicking a pipe and charges $100 for it. When the bill is

Re: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

2004-11-25 Thread Nick Lo
What you are really getting at is not so much that you charge more because you know about building accessible standards based websites but because your experience is broader. For example you can say ...and because the site is built this way it has such and such benefits to vision impaired

Re: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

2004-11-25 Thread Rick Faaberg
On 11/25/04 7:00 PM Jixor - Stephen I [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out: To be honest I don't understand how building using standards could cost more unless you simply don't know what your doing. Its really as simple as that, there is no extra work involved in using standards, if anything its

Re: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

2004-11-25 Thread Vicki Berry
I rarely even mention web standards to clients anymore unless they are govt or govt agencies. I agree that as someone paying a builder to build a house for me, I don't need to know the pros and cons of a certain type of mortar - just do the job and do it so it gets me the result I want! My pitch