[wsjt-devel] build on debian stretch

Has anyone installed or rebuilt wsjtx on the new Debian release 9.0, codename "stretch"? Stretch dropped some packages that weren't being supported upstream, apparently including libreadline6 that wsjtx has as a dependency. libreadline5 is still present in stretch. Log of install attempt

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 Feature Request

I had a similar suggestion: Have a check box to enable auto sequence response to a CQ within n Hz of the cursor frequency. If the message isn't CQ, the program can disregard it to prevent QRMing an in-process QSO (perhaps where one station needs a repeat). I often put the cursor on a QSO with a

Re: [wsjt-devel] Frequency doesn't shift when changing configurations

I've reproduced this partly on my IC-706MKIIG using r going from JT to FT modes on 20m. CAT control works perfectly in JT mode. In switching to FT, the software does not move to the correct frequency. It also does not let me open the drop down to switch bands until I switch back to JT mode.

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 online logging

Same here. TQSL can map FT8 to “Data,” which works fine. For the time being, I am forgoing FT8 uploads to eQSL. George J Molnar, KF2T Nevada, USA > On Jul 3, 2017, at 7:22 PM, Dan Malcolm wrote: > > I suspect I am not the only one with logging problems to eQSL and

[wsjt-devel] FT8 online logging

I suspect I am not the only one with logging problems to eQSL and LoTW. Thanks to a hint from another ham on this forum, I can now trick TQSL into uploading FT8 QSO's. I just heard from an eQSL support volunteer, who in essence says that they are aware of the new mode, but are constrained by

[wsjt-devel] Frequency doesn't shift when changing configurations

Didn't see this reported, so I don't know if this is normal, a bug, or just not tested. Switching configurations from what I have setup for FT8 to the 'normal' JT65/JT9 setup, the frequency does not move from the FT8 to the JT modes frequency. This also occurs going the other way. The only

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 Feature Request

Just bumped into another one; may apply to other modes as well, not sure. When Log QSO on 73's is enabled, the box pops as expected. After Clicking OK to save the QSO, can we get an option to set Tab-2 Gen Message back to CQ ? I suppose that would apply to Tab-1 Tx6 also ? G. -Original

Re: [wsjt-devel] Inquiry about sending .wav files with failed

Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 20:14:39 +0100 From: Bill Somerville To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Inquiry about sending .wav files with failed decodes to development team Message-ID: <1bf00903-804a-a94f-c5d7-391a7e848...@classdesign.com>

[wsjt-devel] FT8 Feature Request

Hi Joe, All, After a brief stint in calling CQ, I soon realized my reflexes with the ole mouse buttons are not what they used to be. I guess I've not been participating in enough RTTY contests :-) In any case: When in RUN mode (calling CQ): - Would it be possible to assign a single hot-key to

Re: [wsjt-devel] Question about QSO Start & End Times

In reply to your other post .. yes, I'm using JTSDK. Again, I'm using Tab 2, not Tab 1. JT65/JT9 .. no auto sequencing. Just double clicking to trigger the next response in the sequence. On 7/3/2017 12:58 PM, Black Michael wrote: Any double-clicks on lines will reset the start time to

Re: [wsjt-devel] new FT8 mode decoding

Thank you for looking at the files Joe. If more files are needed, let me know. Yes, I have noticed major impacts on decoding especially on single hop with meteor pings and doppler mixed in. Also very picky on timing. I try to keep my computer clock very close but if someone's time is off, no

Re: [wsjt-devel] new FT8 mode decoding

Hi again Jay, On 6/29/2017 4:02 PM, Jay Hainline wrote: My message got bounced for being too large. So posting again with 2 wav files instead of 3. Recorded from 50313. Please check the signal around 1050 hz. I was not able to decode. The first of your two files, 170629_194730.wav, decodes

Re: [wsjt-devel] 6 meter opening to EI3KD

Hi Jay, Thanks for sending the files. Alas, there's no way that second one is going to decode -- its S/N is well below -20 dB. -- Joe, K1JT On 7/3/2017 10:33 AM, Jay Hainline wrote: Worked EI3KD using the new mode FT8 on 6 meters this morning! Attached are wav files from his last

Re: [wsjt-devel] Inquiry about sending .wav files with failed decodes to development team

On 03/07/2017 20:02, K5GZR - Rick wrote: I’m new to this list, wanting to send some .wav files with FT8 signals which didn’t decode, even though their tracks on the waterfall looked ‘good’. I see some emails to the list with one or two .wav files attached, but I have quite a few more than

[wsjt-devel] Inquiry about sending .wav files with failed decodes to development team

I'm new to this list, wanting to send some .wav files with FT8 signals which didn't decode, even though their tracks on the waterfall looked 'good'. I see some emails to the list with one or two .wav files attached, but I have quite a few more than that. I put them into a .zip archive and the

Re: [wsjt-devel] Question about QSO Start & End Times

Any double-clicks on lines will reset the start time to "unknown". When the QSO transitions to TX 2 or TX 3 the start time gets set.  Any double clicks on lines after that would also reset the start time.  Tx 6 also resets start time.If start time is not set by TX 2 or TX 3 then it will end up

Re: [wsjt-devel] Question about QSO Start & End Times

So are you running JTSDK that maybe we could debug this on your system?Gotta' figure out why this is happening to you. Mike From: Neil Zampella To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Monday, July 3, 2017 10:09 AM Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Question about QSO Start

Re: [wsjt-devel] r7777 - second 73 doesn't appear in RX window

On 03/07/17 16:20, Richard Lamont wrote: > r > Ubuntu 16.04 amd64 > > If I reply to a CQ and complete a QSO, the other station sends RRR, then > I send 73, and it appears that now the other station responds with a 73 > of his own in the standard auto-sequence (Tab 2) before his TX is >

Re: [wsjt-devel] 6 meter opening to EI3KD

Yes Bill I was. Jay KA9CFD From: Bill Barrett [mailto:w2pky...@gmail.com] Sent: July 3, 2017 15:49 To: WSJT software development Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] 6 meter opening to EI3KD Hello Jay- Were you on 50.313? Thanks; Bill W2PKY On

Re: [wsjt-devel] 6 meter opening to EI3KD

Hello Jay- Were you on 50.313? Thanks; Bill W2PKY On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Jay Hainline wrote: > Worked EI3KD using the new mode FT8 on 6 meters this morning! > > > > Attached are wav files from his last decoded CQ at 1412:30 and another > that did not decode at

Re: [wsjt-devel] Question about QSO Start & End Times

Mike, > Running r on Mac OSX 10.11. This is compiled on a Mac. I understand that JTDSK is a Windows/Linux installation package. > I can't seem to duplicate it here. I assume you are running FT8 on Windows…? I checked that start/stop times are correct with JT9. I then tried FT8 with

[wsjt-devel] r7777 - second 73 doesn't appear in RX window

r Ubuntu 16.04 amd64 If I reply to a CQ and complete a QSO, the other station sends RRR, then I send 73, and it appears that now the other station responds with a 73 of his own in the standard auto-sequence (Tab 2) before his TX is disabled. However, this new seventh exchange only appears in

Re: [wsjt-devel] r7777 last message not in RX window

Looks like a bug - or do I miss something? - G3PXT called CQ - I answered him - autosequence starts As soon as I send '73' the log window comes up and ENABLE TX goes from red to grey (is off) G3PXT sends 'OE1MWW G3PXT 73', but this message does only show up in the left window, but not in 'RX

Re: [wsjt-devel] Question about QSO Start & End Times

Mike, 1. I'm currently on r 2. Tab 2, but normally a DBL click on either the CQ station or the one replying to my CQ 3. The log time is the end time .. see attached. The first is the DXKeeper entry, the second is the ALL.TXT entry, the third is the wsjtx.log, and the last is the

Re: [wsjt-devel] PSKReporter displayed freq for FT8

You are correct -- pskreporter does not modify frequencies. The other note for this mailing list (from a pskreporter perspective) is to encourage people to enter their six character locator (even though only four characaters are used in the various JT* modes). Using the six character locator

Re: [wsjt-devel] JTSDK Usage and Policy Guidelines

Let's not remove capability due to a few minor problems. de Mike W9MDB From: Richard Stanley via wsjt-devel To: WSJT software development Cc: Richard Stanley Sent: Monday, July 3, 2017 2:48 AM

Re: [wsjt-devel] Question about QSO Start & End Times

I can't duplicate the problem on JT9/JT65.  I'm not sure what patch Bill is talking about since I can't find it in my sent folder. So...what's different between your operation and mine? #1 Version you running?  #2 Are you using Tab 1 or Tab 2 for QSO progression?#3 When you log you are seeing

Re: [wsjt-devel] Question about QSO Start & End Times

But Mike, that was happening to me when I was just JT65/JT9 !! Neil, KN3ILZ On 7/2/2017 11:28 PM, Black Michael wrote: I"m not running FT8 so questiondo you see the "Next" buttons getting enabled when progressing on auto sequence? I get the feeling they are not being set which means

Re: [wsjt-devel] Question about QSO Start & End Times

Mike, > I get the feeling they [Next buttons] are not being set Not correct. Auto-seq is on; the QSO proceeds as expected with Next buttons moving from 1, 3 to 5 1924 Transmitting 14.079 MHz FT8: A92AA G4KLA IO92 Next button 1 set 192500 -2 0.3 1055 ~ CQ A92AA LL56

Re: [wsjt-devel] r7775 FT8 decoding

Steve, I should have mentioned that I compile with Qt 5.8 on an iMac but ship the result to my MacBook Pro which lives elsewhere in the house next to the transmitters.Are you also using OSX 10.11? > On the machine that shows the large DTs, if I decode using jt9 from the > command line,

Re: [wsjt-devel] JTSDK Usage and Policy Guidelines

Hi Richard I like having the option of a package build, as I can then transfer the installer to second machine within the household. 73 Charlie G3WDG > > I did that even made videos and posted them on facebook even though Gregs > instructions are more than adequate. > I had a friend who

Re: [wsjt-devel] JTSDK Usage and Policy Guidelines

I did that even made videos and posted them on facebook even though Gregs instructions are more than adequate. I had a friend who started to distribute and I got grief for teaching him. I have even used teamviewer to setup JTSDK on peoples computers buut since the grief I have not done this.