Re: [wsjt-devel] Stale Lock

It’s in the “bin” directory along side WSJT-x. Dave / NX6D From: Phil Theis Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 9:08:32 PM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Stale Lock Where will I find rigctld-wsjtx? Remember, the

Re: [wsjt-devel] Stale Lock

If you installed in the standard location: By default it connects to 127.0.0.1:4532 -v If you need a different address or port then for example: c:\wsjt\wsjt-x\rigctld-wsjtx.exe -m 136 -r 127.0.0.2:4533 -v de Mike W9MDB On Wednesday, October 11, 2017, 11:10:48 PM CDT, Phil Theis

Re: [wsjt-devel] Stale Lock

Where will I find rigctld-wsjtx? Remember, the driver for Flex 6xxx doesn't use (or shouldn't use) CAT com ports; it goes directly over the network via TCP. Who wrote the original 6xxx driver, perhaps we can get info from them? 73, Phil K3TUF On 10/11/2017 11:51 PM, Black Michael via

Re: [wsjt-devel] Stale Lock

One or more of you needs to run rigctld-wsjtx to help debug this. Do you know how to run rigctld-wsjtx?First you do this to get a list of the rig numbers.  346 is the 746Pro rigctld-wsjtx -lthenrigctld-wstx -m 346 -s 19200 -r COM2 -vThen set up the wsjtx rig to Hamlib NET rigctl.I explained

Re: [wsjt-devel] Stale Lock

It's note "telnet" -- that's a specific TCP protocol on a specific port. But yes...there is TCP capability built-in.  I wrote an interface for FLRIg that does TCP for example.And the Flex6xxx also does TCP. de Mike W9MDB On Wednesday, October 11, 2017, 9:07:31 PM CDT, Phil Theis

Re: [wsjt-devel] Stale Lock

Hamlib can do TCP connections to the CAT program. Technically telnet is basically just a TCP stream. 73 Ria, N2RJ On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Phil Theis wrote: > I'm not familiar with hamlib, but are there any telnet facilities built in? > The Flex API is a very easy

Re: [wsjt-devel] Stale Lock

I'm not familiar with hamlib, but are there any telnet facilities built in? The Flex API is a very easy protocol. 73, Phil K3TUF On 10/11/2017 10:01 PM, Ria Jairam wrote: WSJT-X hanging on exit definitely isn’t a SmartSDR problem. Any software should timeout a TCP connection it can’t close

Re: [wsjt-devel] Stale Lock

WSJT-X hanging on exit definitely isn’t a SmartSDR problem. Any software should timeout a TCP connection it can’t close instead of staying hung. However this may be peculiar to Hamlib rather than WSJT-X. We are not the only flex users having this issue and literally nothing else connected to the

Re: [wsjt-devel] valid prefixes in JT65

On 11/10/2017 13:51, Wolfgang wrote: There was a discussion in a Google group about valid prefixes and suffixes that can be used in JT65 - and by the JT65-HB9HQX software. 'jt65code.exe -t' lists all possible variations. Prefix 'A000' to '' should be possible and they will work by testing

Re: [wsjt-devel] Stale Lock

The Flex API works fine, I use it all the time. First I am confused on what to enter in the Server entry, when I enter the IP and Port of the Radio server, it sees the client and I'd have to use wireshark to determine what the program is doing to interrogate. Phil K3TUF On 10/11/2017 5:04

[wsjt-devel] Stale Lock

Sounds more like a problem with SmartSDR than WSJT-X. Maybe we should raise the issue with Flex. BTW. I said I killed the jte.exe entries. I should have said wsjtx.exe as I just scroll down to the bottom of the lists and find up to four instances listed depending how many slices I'm running

Re: [wsjt-devel] Stale lock

So am I. If I run two slices I get wo sale locks. Paul –w4pgm From: Ria Jairam [mailto:rjai...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 4:09 PM To: WSJT software development Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Stale lock For what it’s worth I’m also

[wsjt-devel] Stale lock. Dave Quick

Echo, echo, echo.. For what it’s worth I’m also experiencing the same symptoms of Phil and Ria. I’m also using a flex radio with the ports set to TCP. Echo off. Thought it was just me. I just kill the one or two jt9.exe with task manager and restart the slices. Dave W3DLQ

Re: [wsjt-devel] Stale lock

wasn't jt9 it was wsjt.exe which I stopped and got working again. Tried Exit and that worked on restart Tried the X again, and now that is working. Anomaly I guess Phil K3TUF On 10/11/2017 4:10 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: That should work.  If you get the lock error check to see

Re: [wsjt-devel] Stale lock

Can you run rigctld-wsjtx and use Hamlib NET rigctl for the rig in WSJT-X and see if the problem persists with the TCP ports then? de Mike W9MDB On Wednesday, October 11, 2017, 3:11:16 PM CDT, Ria Jairam wrote: For what it’s worth I’m also experiencing the same

Re: [wsjt-devel] Stale lock

For what it’s worth I’m also experiencing the same symptoms of Phil and I’m also using a flex radio with the ports set to TCP. When I change it to TS2000 and use regular CAT ports the problem goes away. 73 Ria, N2RJ On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 4:03 PM Phil Theis wrote: > What is

Re: [wsjt-devel] Stale lock

What is normal? I click on the X in the upper right. Phil K3TUF On 10/11/2017 3:53 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: That usually indicates jt9.exe is still running. Is WSJT-X crashing on you?  That most always leaves jt9.exe running and you can't remove the lock file until it's killed

Re: [wsjt-devel] Stale lock

That usually indicates jt9.exe is still running.Is WSJT-X crashing on you?  That most always leaves jt9.exe running and you can't remove the lock file until it's killed in task manager.Are you exiting WSJT-X normally? de Mike W9MDB On Wednesday, October 11, 2017, 2:05:03 PM CDT, Phil Theis

[wsjt-devel] Stale lock

With RC2 I keep getting the stale lock error and have to restart the computer to get going again. Also can't get the Flex 6xxx to convey frequency; I always resort to CAT, which works fine. Phil K3TUF -- Check out

Re: [wsjt-devel] current build?

Thanks Erik. That will save questions later. __ Dan – K4SHQ From: Erik - [mailto:erikcarl...@live.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 8:34 AM To: WSJT software development Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] current build? You can know by checking

Re: [wsjt-devel] current build?

You can know by checking https://sourceforge.net/p/wsjt/activity/?page=0=100#59d7acd35fcbc9472c435463 Erik From: Dan Malcolm [mailto:k4...@outlook.com] Sent: 11 October 2017 13:08 To: wsjtx-devel Subject: [wsjt-devel] current build? I make a new build of the

[wsjt-devel] current build?

I make a new build of the WSJT-X devel branch nearly every day. For the last several days, all I get back after a build is the same r8164. Did I miss something or is that right? __ Dan – K4SHQ -- Check out

Re: [wsjt-devel] valid prefixes in JT65

There was a discussion in a Google group about valid prefixes and suffixes that can be used in JT65 - and by the JT65-HB9HQX software. 'jt65code.exe -t' lists all possible variations. Prefix 'A000' to '' should be possible and they will work by testing them with jt65code.exe. Valid