Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

> On Mar 23, 2018, at 12:50 PM, rjai...@gmail.com wrote: > > How do you know we're running power? I said nothing about running power. I said strong signal, wanting to have a way to only allow display or decode of weaker signals, the level of which I determine and set. This is similar to

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

Hi, I support ZL2iFB Gary’s proposal to setup a separate small group to discuss about default frequencies of wsjt-x from the productiveness. Regards, take de JA5AEA Sent from Mail for Windows 10

Re: [wsjt-devel] Callsign highlighting

This would be a big help to have callsigns color coded, would it also be possible to code in filters where some messages are not shown such as other on going qso`s that are not necessary to view and even stations that have been worked B4. This would de-clutter busy screens that have so many

Re: [wsjt-devel] Callsign highlighting

Hi Bill, Thank you for a link to your message aggregator. I will take a closer look at it tonight, it looks like it includes a useful piece of code for working with the wsjt-x messages. I included the Delphi project only as a testing tool for the new feature in wsjt-x, so please ignore it if

Re: [wsjt-devel] Callsign highlighting

On 23/03/2018 20:41, Alex, VE3NEA wrote: I have written some code that allows a UDP server, e.g., a logger, to tell WSJT-X what background color to use for each callsign in the Band Activity panel. This might be useful to those who chase various awards, if the logger assigns different colors

[wsjt-devel] Callsign highlighting

Hello, I have written some code that allows a UDP server, e.g., a logger, to tell WSJT-X what background color to use for each callsign in the Band Activity panel. This might be useful to those who chase various awards, if the logger assigns different colors to new IOTA groups, US counties,

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

OK guys, at the risk of sounding like a cracked record or a corrupted MP3, I’ll give this one more shot. Anecdotal reports tell us very little except in your opinions “The FT8 segment looks crowded”. I agree, that is how it LOOKS. It LOOKS crowded here too … and yet we are still making

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

How do you know we're running power? I run gain antennas including a 3 element beam at height on 30 meters. I get complaints from some that I am running excessive power. (I run 50 watts except on 80/160 and 6m where I will run up to 1500W) Should I just run a G5RV so as not to bend the needle

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

> On Mar 23, 2018, at 2:48 AM, David Alloza wrote: > > The concentration of traffic on the narrow 2.5khz (certainly at excessive > power) causes a significant rise in the noise floor and therefore reduces > the performance of this mode. > I think this is something that

Re: [wsjt-devel] Monitoring stops suddenly in 1.80 and 1.90 RC2

On 23/03/2018 16:14, FRANK DB5FP wrote: Hi Frank, a couple of clarifications. The jt9 process does not directly handle audio samples, they are read and written by a thread of the wsjtx process. The jt9 process is monitored by the wsjtx process and failures are reported via a message box

Re: [wsjt-devel] Monitoring stops suddenly in 1.80 and 1.90 RC2

One of my friends has reported something similar - decodes stop for no reason and start back at random. He doesn't use a Raspberry Pi. He uses a recent 27" iMac and runs Windows in a Parallels instance. The rig is a Flex-6300 and uses the COM port for CAT control (via SmartSDR CAT). CPU usage

Re: [wsjt-devel] Monitoring stops suddenly in 1.80 and 1.90 RC2

> On 22/03/2018 18:42, FRANK DB5FP wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm back with some more Information : > > > > - the soundcard is not a cheapie:-) It's a Terratec Aureon > > I've used it several years for decoding NOAA sats, without > > any notice, even under linux and on RPI2 together with

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-devel Digest, Vol 49, Issue 108

Finally something reasonable. And, having side by side channels makes it easier to use the additional space - which is what is really needed. Al Pawlowski, K6AVP Los Osos, CA USA > On Mar 22, 2018, at 15:19, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote: > > Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

I would concede that in Europe it is a problem. My antennas are beamed to Europe most of the time but there aren't many strong band openings these days. I have also heard grumbling among the PSK31 and Olivia crowd that FT8 is interfering with them. They can move but when we move it may cause

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

The digital mode watering holes are not (as far as I know in most cases) part of any international agreement or national regulation. If a group of operators want to agree amongst themselves to operate on a particular spot, it is incumbent on them to avoid interference with existing operations

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

It's only you Ria! All FT8 subbands are much too crowded, even in the WARC bands. We badly need the higher bands like 21, 24 and 28 MHz but it takes several years when there will be regular openings on those bands. I am terribly surprised when you are living in the USA where there are ARRL, IARU

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

I don't think there needs to really be more room. There are several bands that we can use. I prefer to use WARC bands because I have my fill of DX on 20 meters but WARC bands offer additional opportunities. Especially 30 meters where I have gain antennas. 73 Ria, N2RJ On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at

Re: [wsjt-devel] Ft 8 in Exhibition Mode

Hey Jim – happy to post it there if someone has it handy to provide. Jim S. N2ADV From: W4TMO via wsjt-devel [mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net] Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 8:44 PM To: WSJT software development; Richard Stanley Cc: W4TMO Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Ft 8 in

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

Hi all, let me repeat a URL which is to be read and someone is to call the attention of members of IARU Administrative Council. http://www.iaru.org/administrative-council-meetings.html I guess it's the high time for them to meet asap! gl de ha6nn Andras On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 8:48 AM, David

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

Hi, I would like to add something to the discussion. At my location (JN25UE) at maximum propagation ( near noon) , the FT8 band's noise floor on the 30M is 5db higher than on the rest of the 30M band. The concentration of traffic on the narrow 2.5khz (certainly at excessive power) causes a