Thanks Joe!
I am glad to hear you and the team are working hard to fix these
issues! I am looking forward to them.
If I can help with testing or in some other way than coding please let
me know. I am happy to give back in other ways.
W0MU
On 7/24/2018 2:32 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Mike
Hi all,
On 7/24/2018 5:30 PM, Lance Collister, W7GJ wrote:> Thanks for sharing
this very exciting and welcome news!
I'm not sure why you sent this to a private collection of addressees,
rather than to a list where my original message was posted. I'll
respond here, on wsjt-devel, so that more
The problem with using it with DX friendly propagation is the antipode
being used for R . Yes people should know better but many don’t.
In fact there is guidance that it should be turned off when propagation
favors DX.
Ria
N2RJ
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 8:33 PM W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
> This
Hi Joe,
The plan for enhancing rover operation for WSJT is indeed welcome news! Of
course, we will be on hand with K2EZ/R to help you test it out. I’ll be
following this closely.
73,
Ria, N2RJ
> On Jul 24, 2018, at 4:32 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
>
> Hi Mike and all,
>
> On 7/23/2018 7:37 PM, W0
Thank you Joe. This is great news. I apreciate the effort by the team.
I look forwards to being able to try out the new software in due course.
73
Mark S
VE7AFZ
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Hi Mike and all,
>
> On 7/23/2018 7:37 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
>
>> Firs
Hi Mike and all,
On 7/23/2018 7:37 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
First of all I want to thank everyone for this great advancement in the
hobby!
... (however, ...)
The CQ WW VHF was my first exposure to contest mode and it was a very
frustrating 27 hours.
Thanks for all the messages about c
The best solution is one simple report for contests of normal operations
at least for FT8. That would seem to eliminate lots of coding. It is
works for a contest, it should work for day to day activities. People
will have to change, will have to upgrade, etc. Speaking of upgrades
has there
George,
Not necessarily. If you call CQ in contest mode, and I answer expecting a
"normal" QSO, I may give up when I get "NC6K KF2T FMxx". Or, I send "KF2T NC6K
-3" and you send "NC6K KF2T R FMxx", and I'm ticked off b/c I didn't get a
report.
There are several permutations where it would jus
Sorry I should have been more clear in my last email. I support the idea of
using the extra bits in FT8 to indicate contest mode and "/R" calls.
I'm sorry I couldn't undertake to code this and provide support to the users.
I would be happy to help test this.
Thanks again to the WSJT-x team
Wouldn’t it be simpler to have the sequencer logic respond to R XX## without
choking? If we can do away with antipodal grids, that should make both modes
compatible. The sequences will continue and not be lengthened by either or both
of the operators trying to switch.
George J Molnar
Virginia,
I'd support using an extra FT8 bit to explicitly indicate contest mode (using
another extra bit to explicitly indicate a "/R" call would also be nice.) I
realize there is a desire to keep FT8 and MSK144 functionality as similar as
possible (and that MSK144 doesn't have the "extra bits" that FT
I also was more than a bit frustrated with the contest mode this past weekend.
It's not a fault of the software, just that there's no way to know from
someone's CQ whether they are in contest or QSO mode.
A suggestion that is hopefully easy to code that might fix the problem - add a
CQ predefin
Bill, please name one contest that takes place on reserved frequencies?
There are none. Every other contest allows casuals to jump in and work
who they want. Most participants in a contest are casual ops and not
really competing to win anything.
The software should just be able to comple
Perhaps these contests should be on a separate frequency designated to be
operated as "contest mode"?
Bill W2PKY
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 7:37 PM W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
> First of all I want to thank everyone for this great advancement in the
> hobby!
>
>
> The CQ WW VHF was my first exposure
14 matches
Mail list logo
