Have you tried this setting? Seesms reducing this should work.
LIN OUT NOR 010 Sets the LINE OUT level. LINE OUT connections go to PC
soundcard inputs.Settings above 10 may result in overdrive of the soundcard or
saturation of theKIO3’s isolation transformers; monitor signals using the PC to
Hi Joe,It seems that good ethics and principals along with some good common
sense should prevail.Bill W5WJH
On Saturday, March 13, 2021, 3:57:11 PM CST, Joe Taylor
wrote:
This message is addressed to Хрисимир Христов (Christo Hristov), LZ2HV,
the author of software program
Evidently something caused a little availability delay.
I'm checking from time to time to get the new GA.
All the best everybody!
---
73 de Marco, PY1ZRJ (former IK5BCU)
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
On 3/14/21 at 12:32 PM, g4...@classdesign.com (Bill Somerville) wrote:
>the only input level WSJT-X has access to is in the digital
>domain, i.e. after the soundcard ADC, that means it cannot make
>any useful adjustment if the level is too high. The level
>adjustment must be made in the analog
Bill:
OK.. will do this (I already have a unique config for some modes).
Thank you!
73,
Dave
From: Bill Somerville
Reply-To: WSJT software development
Date: Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 11:37 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X feature request: JT-65A (1270Hz) and Q65
(1500Hz) defaults
You wrote:
“Tx slider seems unnecessary because every radio (correct me if wrong) allows a
Tx or drive level reduction on the radio itself).”
That is very much not the case. Many rigs require a different drive level per
band, something that WSJTX handles perfectly.
> On Mar 14, 2021, at
On 14/03/2021 16:30, David Schmocker wrote:
Dear WSJT development team:
Would it be possible (easy) to establish default Tx and Rx frequencies
per mode:
JT-65A (Tx 1270 Hz and Rx 1270Hz) any time JT-65 mode is selected and
Q65 (Tx 1,500 Hz and Rx 1500 Hz)?
I realize these can be manually
On 14/03/2021 16:25, David Schmocker wrote:
Dear WSJT-X development team:
Feature request:
Could we eliminate the Tx Power slider (lower right of main screen)
and replace it with an Rx input level slider (far lower left of screen
immediately adjacent to the Rx dB level) to allow attenuation
Re: David Schmocker
> Tx slider seems unnecessary because every radio (correct me if wrong) allows
> a Tx or drive level reduction on the radio itself).
By that argument, you could as well put an attenuator into your
antenna line to have the RX level reduced to what you wanted.
Christoph
Dear WSJT development team:
Would it be possible (easy) to establish default Tx and Rx frequencies per
mode:
JT-65A (Tx 1270 Hz and Rx 1270Hz) any time JT-65 mode is selected and
Q65 (Tx 1,500 Hz and Rx 1500 Hz)?
I realize these can be manually changed (what I do currently), but
Dear WSJT-X development team:
Feature request:
Could we eliminate the Tx Power slider (lower right of main screen) and replace
it with an Rx input level slider (far lower left of screen immediately adjacent
to the Rx dB level) to allow attenuation of input Rx signal please?
More
Hi:
Update, FYI, Q65 mode was removed in the latest version of MSHV. I support
Joe Taylor point, regarding derivatives should wait until GA for inclusion
in their versions. Deference to the developers, basic professional sense.
IMO, without FT8, FT4 and now Q65, digital ham radio was way too
On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 06:46:42PM -0500, Joe Taylor wrote:
> We're not particularly interested in litigating nuances of wording. This is
> just a hobby, for all of us. We're just asking for fair play.
As the author of some GPL'd software myself, and having been in similar
situations, I can
Re: Joe Taylor
> Most people on this list know I'm a scientist, so I'll use a scientific
> analogy. Copying or adapting our code (which is still in development) and
> publishing the result is analogous to entering our laboratory when its door
> was left open, copying the laboratory notebooks
14 matches
Mail list logo
