Hi:
Problem reported earlier re Win 10 64bit not installing was related with
ANtiVirus software. Was able to install after disabling online protection.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 3:39 PM Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> No problem Joe!
>
> I
Hi Again:
The crash happened when installing. At the license window.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 12:39 PM Edfel Rivera wrote:
> Hi:
> Thanks for WSJTX Development. Have 2.6.0 GA crashed (Windows 10 64bit).
> Report from Windows Event Viewer. Tried downloading agai
Hi:
Thanks for WSJTX Development. Have 2.6.0 GA crashed (Windows 10 64bit).
Report from Windows Event Viewer. Tried downloading again, same result. If
dev team need specifics send email to edfeljose at gmail.com
Thanks
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
Log Name: Application
Source:Application Error
Thank you Joe. As gratitude for all the joy we have from the technologies
developed by the team WSJTX, and their impact all over the world, I will be
watching the service. My condolences. Peace for all of his friends and
the WSJTX team. Thank you Bill! G4WJS.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Mon, Jan 24,
Hi:
Update, FYI, Q65 mode was removed in the latest version of MSHV. I support
Joe Taylor point, regarding derivatives should wait until GA for inclusion
in their versions. Deference to the developers, basic professional sense.
IMO, without FT8, FT4 and now Q65, digital ham radio was way too lim
Feb 3, 2021 at 4:07 PM Edfel Rivera wrote:
>
>> Hi:
>> Please see attachment. Seems to be decoding or the functionality is
>> correct. Also, what TX power could be used? As TX intervals increase,
>> Could that cause damage to rig terminals? Thinking of JT65 where TX power
Hi:
Please see attachment. Seems to be decoding or the functionality is
correct. Also, what TX power could be used? As TX intervals increase,
Could that cause damage to rig terminals? Thinking of JT65 where TX power
< ~30watts.
BTW, Thank you very much for INNOVATION. Seems like another fantas
Ron, WV4P
>
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2020, 9:09 PM Edfel Rivera wrote:
>
>> Hi Again:
>>
>> One last question, FT4 Mode is assisted or non-assisted" I mean the
>> answer to this question:
>>
>> At any time during the contest, did you use spotting assistance
e for
stations from Oregon, Washington, very weak but confirmed.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 9:35 PM Edfel Rivera wrote:
> Hi Ron:
>
> Thank you very much, deleted the QSO. I guess some stations try to
> capitalize from the contest activity and advance their contacts. I
; FT-8 with the constant, deliberate QRM from casual stations.
>
> Ron, WV4P
>
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 15:33, Edfel Rivera wrote:
>
>> Hi:
>>
>> Probably not related with WSJTX. Browsing the contest log, I have
>> detected some DX stations sent report with
Hi:
Probably not related with WSJTX. Browsing the contest log, I have detected
some DX stations sent report with no serial. I did'nt noticed they were CQ
and not CQ RU
Question is how should I proceed as upload form is reporting:
number of fields in QSO line less than mininum expected(11)
Hi All:
Just a reflection about FT4 and FT8, sensitivity and cycle times. From my
experience, FT4, is less sensitive than FT8. Please note my QTH is in
Caribbean far distant than stations in the mainland. My opinion is that IF
FT4 could be improved (maybe a v2 of the mode) regarding sensitivity
Hi All:
My experience from the Caribbean for example 6M no FT4 QSO so far. Tried
80m and similar experience, although I can hear some stations. No QSO.
For users working the magic bad, at distant locations FT4 is out the scene
unless conditions are excellent. Just my experience, However, will
Hi All:
I noticed this behavior and try move to another frequency to respect the
original calling CQ station. Maybe set WSJTX to move to a fixed (extreme
end) freq after answering a CQ, say 3000. Just an idea.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 4:14 PM Jim Brown
wrote:
> On 7/28/2019 1
Hi Don:
Why not include the 6M band? Know it is mostly active in summer but even
the ARRL Sept VHF (Sept 14-16) include the bad. Just wondering why to
exclude the 6M.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 4:50 PM Don Hill AA5AU wrote:
> For immediate release. June 29, 2019.
>
>
>
> The Wor
Thank you Mike!!
Worked that way.
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 4:36 PM Black Michael via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Hmmm...64-bit version RC6 working here.
>
> Can you try starting yours with a new config and see if that fixes it?
> e.g.
> wsjtx -r test
>
> de Mike W9MDB
>
Hi:
Wilndows 10, nor RC6 32 bit or 64 bit version start. RC5 worked fine.
Restarted system still same problem,
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 4:11 PM DG2YCB, Uwe wrote:
> Same here. Win 10 64 bit version not starting.
>
>
>
> 73 de Uwe, DG2YCB
>
>
>
> *Von:* Jari A [mailto:oh2...@gmail.com
Hi:
Maybe a corrupt driver. If you installed or used another application. I
had problems with my Kenwood 590SG not sure if it was Winlink or a Windows
update. Maybe reinstall drivers (depending on rig). Plug unplug USB
cable.
Just my 2 cents.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 8:22 PM Ha
Hi Richard:
Keep present clock diff have to be < .5. FT4 is more strict regarding time.
73'
Edfel
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 9:02 PM Richard Lamont wrote:
> On 06/05/2019 15:45, Joe Taylor wrote:
>
> > One-hour "practice contest" sessions will be held this week and next
> > week using the FT4 mo
Hi All:
Noticed when changing MODE to FT4 frequency changes accordingly for each
band. However, IF change back from FT4 to FT8 from MODE menu, frequency
stays (incorrectly) at the FT4 frequency.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@l
Hi:
I reported something related when station report with contest mode reply,
if your are not in contest mode WSJTX suggest you (popup window) to setup
contest mode. However, if you are not interested in operating contest mode
at that moment (just making QSO's) it disrupts the calling station
ope
Hi:
I noticed sometimes the popup window to log QSO shows OK at the left
(expected) and sometimes the button shown at left is CANCEL. Minor issue
but for consistency should be verified.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sou
were in transmit ... at least
> it corresponds to that here.
>
> Neil, KN3ILZ
>
> On 4/30/2019 8:04 PM, Edfel Rivera wrote:
> > Hi All:
> >
> > Noticed Band Activity and Band Rx colors populate/corrupt Waterfall.
> > See attached image.
> >
> > Regards!
&g
Hi:
At bottom of main window I see two FT4 labels one is for configuration name
the second one for the operating MODE. Not sure but when I change
configuration to default it continued to show 'FT4'.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-dev
Hi All:
Yes, realized that after posting. Contest Logs not logged unless in
contest mode. But logged at wsj_log.
Thanks!
Edfel
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 1:46 PM Joe Taylor wrote:
> On 4/29/2019 18:52, Edfel Rivera KP4AJ wrote:
>
> > Not sure if missing something from guide, Con
Hi:
Setup Kenwood 590SG, Windowa 10 64bit. Program crashes everytime I try to
CQ at the 80m band. It popups configuration window.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinf
Hi:
Not sure if missing something from guide, Contest Log not showing new QSO
with FT4. RC5 Windows 10 64bit.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Hi:
The Dev Team raise again the level. Given FT8 success, FT4 Could be
another killer mode. I hope so. Now some questions, When the Dev Team
expects the mode will be available for loading QSO with it. Yes I know it
is premature but... have to ask. Until that QSO are advised to upload as
"DAT
Thanks.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 9:22 PM Joe Taylor wrote:
> That's "TEST" as in "CONTEST".
>
> On 1/19/2019 21:16, Edfel Rivera wrote:
> > Hi Again:
> >
> > I am also limited to the 6m band for testing and prop
Hi Again:
I am also limited to the 6m band for testing and propagation not good for
Caribbean. It make testing more difficult. However was able to make some
regular QSO with station in FL.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 9:12 PM Edfel Rivera wrote:
> Hi Joe:
>
> CQ
you consider "broken" ?
>
> -- 73, Joe, K1JT
>
> On 1/19/2019 20:56, Edfel Rivera wrote:
> > Hi:
> > Not sure it was stated, when settings NA VHF, functionality seems broken
> > compared with RU. Unle
Hi:
Not sure it was stated, when settings NA VHF, functionality seems broken
compared with RU. Unless am not doing it right.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-
Hi All:
Joe, Bill and Dev Team Thank you very much for v2 making WSJTX a robust
contest platform. Now that WSJTX have make a success in the RTTY Round Up,
will like to know (ask) which other contest will be supported. For
example, *CQ World Wide VHF Contest. Also, how to setup ARRL June VHF (NA
Hi All:
My first contest sorry for some simple questions. First, I figured how to
edit Contest Name, at Log Export just use ARRL-RTTY. I do have a specific
problem, have to set RTTY RU EXC to DX (Advance Settings).
After uploading my log, I am receiving warnings "copied exchange
(qthserial) is
Hi:
Seems I missed resetting title. Any idea how to change Contest name and
what is the correct contest name. Previous to the contest I reset log but
name of previous contest is still there.
BTW, great contest for FT8 and WSJTX. For those who were skeptical about
contesting compliance capabil
Hi Bill:
YEs thats my radio. Anyway thanks for the reply.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 12:38 PM Bill Somerville
wrote:
> On 28/12/2018 17:20, Edfel Rivera wrote:
> > Just asking if WSJTX user been able to test FT8 or MSK144 with an ICOM
> > 4100 radio. If som
Hi:
Just asking if WSJTX user been able to test FT8 or MSK144 with an ICOM 4100
radio. If someone could share how to configure will appreciate. I have
icom data cable plus signalink USB.
Thanks in advance!
Edfel
KP4AJ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-
Hi All:
WSJTX 2.0 running fine here. Users observing few decodes should be sure
UTC time difference not more that 1 second. BTW, FT8 RoundUp (WSJTX RC5)
was a test best, my experience contacts from Caribbean to Turkey, Hungary,
Italy, Argentina, Saudi Arabia, Bulgaria, New Zeland, Serbia, Canada
and
yes it remains. Yes, strange it NOT happening in the 6m band 50.313. WIll
test other bands. Just adding this info. Seems like isolated issue only
happening here.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 3:11 PM Bill Somerville
wrote:
> On 01/12/2018 19:44, Edfel Rivera wrote:
Hi All:
Please check attachments. This was using TAB1. First situation I called
PA0TCA (sequence1) and got report from Otto. My station sent RRR twice.
Because propagation, station busy, after not getting a response, WSJTX goes
to TXT2 sending first report again. I manually changed the message
Hi All:
Tab 2 is my default operating since using WSJTX (1.6). Vote to keep it as
option or better find a fix. Also, IMO Tab 2 make the program more
intuitive and UI more appealing. Particularly when calling CQ. It is
matter of preferences, at least make option to use and alert (through
messag
Hi Again:
Thinking again about this thing, best explanation ContestLog file got
corrupted probably at entry 26 and that affected no more QSO were being
logged. Yes, there was something I remember happening with the popup QSO
window where garbage from PPT was received at one of the fields. Have
c
Hi:
Your callsign is?
Could check, I am at 40m, KP4AJ
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 11:45 PM Bill Pence wrote:
> Yep
> I see lots of cq ru using rc5. Few answers when i reply.
>
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2018, 11:40 PM Edfel Rivera
>> Hi:
>>
>> Be sure to use frequencies 70
Hi:
Be sure to use frequencies 7080 40m, 14130 20m. Also clock sync is
essential. UTC diff no more than 1.5 seconds. RC5 testing HUGE today (day
and night). Worked bunch stations.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 11:33 PM Dave Barr wrote:
> During the FT8 Roundup, I am decoding only
Hi:
Forgot to tell (previous post) those recent QSO were using TAB1.
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:08 PM Edfel Rivera wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> Well, after editing the 569 0064 to 569 FL (row 26) QSO are logging again
> and nicely. What was the problem, not sure but Recevd
us to another row. Until you do that pending edits will block the
> > addition of a new QSO. This was not intended and it will be fixed.
> >
> > 73
> > Bill
> > G4WJS.
> >
> > On 02/12/2018 02:29, Edfel Rivera wrote:
> > > Hi Bill:
> > >
>
RR73
Will continue testing.
Sorry, I don't like to report problems. But is the only way to tell what
seems to be not working as should.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 9:29 PM Edfel Rivera wrote:
> Hi Bill:
>
> I filled those fields (operator, name) becaus
r row to commit any edits, then you can
> log a new row.
>
> I am surprised how many reports of this there are, what is requiring
> editing on the contest log window?
>
> 73
> Bill
> G4WJS.
>
> On 01/12/2018 22:32, Edfel Rivera wrote:
>
> Hi:
>
> QSO bel
your call
> in there anyway. Having your name in there is bound to confuse some
> software somewhere... :)
>
> 73
>
> -Jim
> NU0C
>
>
> On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 20:41:37 -0500
> Edfel Rivera wrote:
>
> > Hi Jim:
> >
> > See the another popup window
ion call under certain
> circumstances.
>
> 73
> -Jim
> NU0C
>
> On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 17:32:38 -0500
> Edfel Rivera wrote:
>
> > Hi:
> >
> > QSO below was refused to Log into ContestLog. ContestLog have 26 entries
> > also other QSO after
Hi Bill:
Not big deal or a must. Probably when working with standard frequencies
the 'anomaly' is negligible.
Thank you all development team!!
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 8:18 PM Bill Somerville
wrote:
> On 02/12/2018 01:09, Edfel Rivera wrote:
> > Hi:
Hi:
If I access configuration (was at 7.080.00, when exit configuration,
program sets frequency to 7.078.00. Just pointing if this is the intended
behavior. IMO when exit configuration screen, frequency should not
change.
Thanks.
Edfel
KP4AJ
___
wsjt
Bill:
Sorry, yes TAB1 populates Rcp Sent and Exc Sent but program refuses to log
QSO using both option automatic or Promp me. Disabled logging so I can
continue. I even trioed closing everything but WSJTX. I clsed JTAlert,
Firefox. etc.
Thanks again,
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 7:57
Hi Bill:
Not wanting to save QSO here is another.
Thanks again
Edfel
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 5:58 PM Michael Baker wrote:
> Now mine is closing the program when I hit log entry. UG!
>
> Mike K7DD
>
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 2:49 PM Edfel Rivera wrote:
>
>> Hi Bi
; > On 12/1/2018 1:56 PM, Edfel Rivera wrote:
> >> Hi Again:
> >>
> >> Same happens with "Prompt me to log QSO". Those fields are not
> >> populated.
> >>
> >
> > Same here.
> >
> > Dana K6JQ
> >
> Hi E
Hi:
QSO below was refused to Log into ContestLog. ContestLog have 26 entries
also other QSO after that was logged. Not sure why but had to cancel
logging of N5OK QSO.
Thanks.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.ne
Hi Again:
Same happens with "Prompt me to log QSO". Those fields are not populated.
Thanks.
Edfel
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 4:55 PM Edfel Rivera wrote:
> Hi Bill:
>
> Thanks for reply. Enclosed the reporting setting.
>
> 73'
>
> Edfel
> KP4AJ
>
> O
Hi Bill:
Thanks for reply. Enclosed the reporting setting.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 4:30 PM Bill Somerville
wrote:
> On 01/12/2018 20:45, Edfel Rivera wrote:
> > For those getting annoyed for the popuo telling invalid QSO, you just
> > have to fill R
s for the RTTY Roundup?
>
> de Mike W9MDB
>
>
>
>
> On Saturday, December 1, 2018, 2:49:09 PM CST, Edfel Rivera <
> edfelj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi All:
>
> For those getting annoyed for the popuo telling invalid QSO, you just have
> to fill R
Hi All:
For those getting annoyed for the popuo telling invalid QSO, you just have
to fill Rcp Sent and Exc Sent. Nothing more click ok and QSO is logged.
That simple.
As feature request, I would like the program to populate the GRID field,
when possible.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
__
Hi:
After enlarging WSJTX window stop responding and TAsk Manager was required
to close program
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ.
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Hi Andreas:
I worked yesterday night various stations, 7080, be sure to set in Advance
Special Op and ARRL RTTY. Right now on 20m 14130 many RC4 -5 Stations and
decodind!
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 2:51 PM Andreas Ma wrote:
> Hi David and all
>
>
>
> Same problem here. I’m on 709
Hi:
Configuration --> Advance --> Special Operating [x] -- > ARRL RTTY [x] and
yes goto 14130 whwre testing on 20m is huge.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 2:18 PM WB5JJJ wrote:
> These stations with 5xx numbers should NOT be operating on the standard
> FT8 frequencies. They are opera
Hi All:
First I am very positive with WSJTX v2 RC5. Have worked DX many US states,
Poland, Slovenia, and more. One thing I have noticed when PPT is active
open windows get input and not respond to OS as should. OS Windows 10.
Not sure if others have observed this behavior.
Very pleased with Con
Hi Gavin:
Mke sure to fill exchange sent and operator name. Also grid if in blank.
Same happen here and gone once I completed those fields.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:52 PM ZL3GAV wrote:
> Hello
>
>
>
> Propagation is not great to ZL this afternoon, however I worked VK4CMV,
>
Hi Again:
Typo in previous message, I mean LOTS!!!
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 7:20 PM Edfel Rivera wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> Thank you very much development team. RC5 stable and decoding as used
> too. Worked Alabama, California, Poland, Slovenia from Caribbean
led in that way (and I think it happens with 1.9.1
too) when PPT is active and a Windows window is open, cursor moves until
PPT stops. It can be also a Windows "thing".
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:52 PM Edfel Rivera wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> Just to remind to operate beyond 2 hz.
&g
Hi All:
Just to remind to operate beyond 2 hz.
73'
Edfel
KP4Aj
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:30 PM Krzysztof Krzemiński
wrote:
> Hello,
> already done first contacts using RC5.
> SUPER
> Kris, SP5NOH
>
> pon., 26 lis 2018 o 22:58 Joe Taylor napisał(a):
>
>> A fifth candidate release ("RC5") of W
Bill Somerville
wrote:
> On 15/11/2018 01:24, Edfel Rivera wrote:
> > Hi:
> > I am not sure if this could be a change in my settings or if is
> > improvement with 2.0 RC4. I have the impression that the meter is
> > going a bit further into the right. Yes I know to be sure I
Hi:
I am not sure if this could be a change in my settings or if is improvement
with 2.0 RC4. I have the impression that the meter is going a bit further
into the right. Yes I know to be sure I have to compare with 1.9.1. Maybe
in next days could do the comparison.
Could be wrong.
Regards and
Hi Again:
Bill. Which setting is better for split, 'rig' or 'fake it'? Have that
doubt, PPT and TX meter works with both.
Thanks.
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:23 PM Edfel Rivera wrote:
> Hi Bill:
>
> Thank you. However I don't understand why I ca
> On 14/11/2018 00:49, Edfel Rivera wrote:
> > Hi:
> >
> > I was able to make some QSO with RC4. After testing some bands, WSJTX
> > is not activating PPT as usual. Will try goind back to 1.9.1. I
> > moved freq to above 2k as instructions have QSO with W7AH an
Hi:
I was able to make some QSO with RC4. After testing some bands, WSJTX is
not activating PPT as usual. Will try goind back to 1.9.1. I moved freq
to above 2k as instructions have QSO with W7AH and TI5/N5BEK 20 and 12
meters.
Seems weird, was worry about PS or the RIG but PPT works ok with
Hi:
Have tried FT8 2 and achieved QSO 20m. Seems to work fine. Some
observations, notice lock TX and RX buttom no longer available? Tried
MSK144 but I know there is a fix so will wait RC2 to test more.
Finally, I left program monitoring - open (was not present because upset
stomach) and got th
Hi:
Just wonder since 14078 is used instead of 14074, same with the 40m, which
is the proposed freq for 6m FT8?
Thanks and 73'
.
Edfel
KP4AJ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-
Hi:
I work most of the time (when is its time), the 6 meter band.. Other bands
are 40 and 80m. 20m is relatively easy (IMO) to get QSO.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Barry Smith wrote:
> In message mail.com>
> Edfel Rivera wrote:
>
> >
Hi:
IMO, having the program send a small capture of the generated TX signal
might be useful to know how much power is being used. Sometimes other
radio operators complaints of too much power used for TX. But in my
experience, some distant QSO requires more power to get a complete
contact.
What
Hi:
Upsss, my bad! Sorry.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Bill Somerville
wrote:
> On 09/08/2017 19:09, Edfel Rivera wrote:
>
>> Please check, this problem seems to still be present. After using 1.8
>> rc1 had to reset frequencies again at the develo
Hi Bill:
Please check, this problem seems to still be present. After using 1.8 rc1
had to reset frequencies again at the development build 1.7.1 (8018).
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
FYI. The app is broken with latest build build 8017 was working. Freq
>>> 50.313 is shown in red and bad can not be change
Hi Again:
Functionality in band scroll-down selection with 1.8 rc1 shows band
information completely. Not in latest build. Maybe I should have reported
as change in functionality (defect?) and not as toooltip suggestion.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Edfel Rivera
Hi:
Instead of just showing Frequency (Mhz), Could the toolpip show the freq
number. I mean when scrolling the bands for change.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging
Bill Somerville
wrote:
> On 09/08/2017 17:24, Edfel Rivera wrote:
>
>> FYI. The app is broken with latest build build 8017 was working. Freq
>> 50.313 is shown in red and bad can not be changed.
>>
>
> Hi Edfel,
>
> I have just repaired a defect in the WSJT-X v1.8
Hi:
FYI. The app is broken with latest build build 8017 was working. Freq
50.313 is shown in red and bad can not be changed.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging
Hi:
Not sure where to post this question if here or at Yahoo groups. Anyway
build 7955 allows for Enable AP. Sorry for my ignorance but what AP means
and what functionality have? Have browsed comments and not able to get the
info. Until, the online documentation is updated have to ask ;)
Than
Hi Bill:
Usually I try to look into code changes. Will be more aware of monitoring
code changes comments.
Thanks!
Edfel
KP4AJ
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Bill Somerville
wrote:
> On 22/07/2017 20:47, Edfel Rivera wrote:
>
>> Thank you Mike! After fixing PC time, decoding
r DT.
>
> Sanity check time at http://time.is
>
> For Windows I can recommend Meinberg NTP.
>
> de Mike W9MDB
>
>
> --
> *From:* Edfel Rivera
> *To:* WSJT software development
> *Sent:* Saturday, July 22, 2017 2:24 PM
> *Subje
Hi:
Band Selection Scroll List have 6m (50,276) listed twice.
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot__
Hi:
When trying FT8 program is crashing. See image.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot_
Hi:
Just an observation. FT8 mode addressed an answer to a 'issue' among JT65
and users regarding long time for QSO. I want to congratulate the WSJTX
development team. Thats why I prefer to stick with the 'source' and not
try forks!
IMO, WSJTX versioning should move some numbers up to reflect
for
> CTRL+M.
>
>
> On 6/30/2017 2:40 PM, Edfel Rivera wrote:
>
>> Hi:
>>
>> I am not sure what I did but I am not able to access configuration.
>> Also, can not change band. I tried building new but no fix.
>>
>> Previously used 1.7.1 wi
Hi:
I am not sure what I did but I am not able to access configuration. Also,
can not change band. I tried building new but no fix.
Previously used 1.7.1 with out any problem.
Thanks.
Edfel
KP4AJ
--
Check out the vibr
Hi:
Below build information and some warnings. Build completes properly.
Testing WSJTX rev 7050 now. Clipboard copied to 91% build but build run to
100%. Ok.
73'
Edfel
KP4AJ
---
SVN Check
Update fro
Followed Mike's (W9MDB) advise, running the test again (wsjtx build 7005)
using TM -D710 model (234) there is some progress as rig seems detected.
It seems to wait for command.
However when trying WSJTX 1.7 Devel Front-End I can not make the program
return an OK (green response) the rig still not
Hi:
First there was a 'typo' on previous post I mean signalink USB TNC.
Error I am getting is this:
Rig failure
Hamlib error: Communcation timed out while opening connection to rig
Did the command instructed:
rigctl-wsjtx -m 227 -r com5 -s 9600 -v
Output:
(JTSDK-QT 5.2 ) C:\JTSDK\wsjtx\d
Hi:
Thank you very much for the work on WSJTX. Not problem at all use HF, it
recognizes my Kenwood 480 and I could make QSO from 6m to 80m.
However when trying to explore VHF other modes besides JT65 JT9, WSJTX
Devel is not able to recognize the rig (Kenwood TM v71). Both rigs use
signalink USB
95 matches
Mail list logo
