(un)stability of the propagation path on 160m
band may prevent usage of the slowest modes.
73, Reino OH3mA
-Original Message-
From: Glenn Williams via wsjt-devel [mailto:wsjt-
de...@lists.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 5:46 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Gle
I've tried using FST4-xxx modes on 160. Trouble is not enough are using it.
How can we get more people to try it?
Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote:
> Spend some time reading the WSJT-X User Guide. Pay particular attention
> to Section 17.2. Its Table 7 summarizes the threshold sensitivities of
73, Reino OH3mA
-Original Message-
From: Glenn Williams via wsjt-devel [mailto:wsjt-
de...@lists.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 5:46 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Glenn Williams
Subject: [wsjt-devel] 160m S/N needs advanced mode
Hello,
FT8 on 160m pales.
Hi Glenn,
FT4 and FT8 are a tiny fraction of what's available in WSJT-X. Modes
that meet the needs you describe are already available in the program.
Spend some time reading the WSJT-X User Guide. Pay particular attention
to Section 17.2. Its Table 7 summarizes the threshold sensitivities
-
> de...@lists.sourceforge.net]
> Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 5:46 PM
> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Glenn Williams
> Subject: [wsjt-devel] 160m S/N needs advanced mode
>
> Hello,
>
> FT8 on 160m pales.
>
> WSJT-X operators customarily running FT
A few days ago I worked a ZL stn with 80 watts to a 40ft vertical with just
a few long radials. My report was -11 on FT8.
>From time to time 160M propagation is amazing even during strong Sun Spot
cycle times.
Bill
W2PKY Tampa Fl.
___
wsjt-devel mailing
Glenn,A mode that differs from FST4?Ed N4II.
Original message From: Glenn Williams via wsjt-devel
Date: 12/7/23 1:26 PM (GMT-06:00) To:
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Glenn Williams
Subject: [wsjt-devel] 160m S/N needs advanced mode Hello,FT8 on 160m
pales.WSJT-X
Glenn the new mode you want has been out for quite awhile. FST4 is that mode.
However 160M ops have been slow to adopt it. I guess because it’s not a set and
forget mode like FT8 is.
Fred
N2XK
> On Dec 7, 2023, at 2:28 PM, Glenn Williams via wsjt-devel
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> FT8 on 160m
Hi Glenn,
You might like the FST4 QSO mode. Same operating procedure as FT8, but
depending on cycle length it can decode below -30 dB.
It is mostly used on 630m but I also had (transatlantic) contacts on 160m.
https://wsjt.sourceforge.io/FST4_Quick_Start.pdf
73
Stefan
On 07.12.23 16:46,
Keep in mind that 160 is dead right now due to the sun cycle. 160 is
always dead during the day.
Larry / W1DYJ
On 12/7/2023 10:46, Glenn Williams via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hello,
FT8 on 160m pales.
WSJT-X operators customarily running FT8 and FT4 on 80m through 10m HF
bands are likely
Hello,
FT8 on 160m pales.
WSJT-X operators customarily running FT8 and FT4 on 80m through 10m HF
bands are likely disappointed with trials on 160m. As one of those
operators I recently ran WSPR on 160m in comparison to working FT8 QSOs
on 160m. In NA EST daytime operation at 2220Z WSPR
11 matches
Mail list logo
