Glenn,A mode that differs from FST4?Ed N4II.
-------- Original message --------From: Glenn Williams via wsjt-devel
<wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Date: 12/7/23 1:26 PM (GMT-06:00) To:
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Glenn Williams <a...@alumni.caltech.edu>
Subject: [wsjt-devel] 160m S/N needs advanced mode Hello,FT8 on 160m
pales.WSJT-X operators customarily running FT8 and FT4 on 80m through 10m HF
bands are likely disappointed with trials on 160m. As one of those operators I
recently ran WSPR on 160m in comparison to working FT8 QSOs on 160m. In NA EST
daytime operation at 2220Z WSPR faultlessly listed a -28 dBm decode.Here I
suggest we need an improved decode sensitivity for 160m QSOs, likely needing to
be done with a new mode. Granted, the TX and RX times would have to be
increased (Shannon-Hartley Theorem). That would require additional operator
patience and associated protocols for the extended timing.--73, Glenn, AF8C--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
software.www.avast.com_______________________________________________wsjt-devel
mailing
listwsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
