While true that JTDX will decode a few more signals it comes at a price that
being greater CPU use and it does not have the decode speed of WSJTX. From a
long time JTDX user that uses both programs.
73 Morris WA4MIT
On Friday, July 3, 2020, 11:20:58 PM CDT, Jim Brown
wrote:
Several m
osystemsgroup.com]
> Sent: Saturday, 4 July 2020 2:15 PM
> To: WSJT software development
> Subject: [wsjt-devel] 2.2.2 Decoding Performance
>
> Several members of the Slack VHF group have commented that JTDX is decoding
> more signals than 2.2.2. Seeing that, I've started running bo
Message-
From: Jim Brown [mailto:k...@audiosystemsgroup.com]
Sent: Saturday, 4 July 2020 2:15 PM
To: WSJT software development
Subject: [wsjt-devel] 2.2.2 Decoding Performance
Several members of the Slack VHF group have commented that JTDX is decoding
more signals than 2.2.2. Seeing that, I&#x
Jim,
A very appropriate comment based on some email chats here going on in the
background. Background discussion that I have been having relates around the
"standards" discussion opened earlier in the week and the necessity in this
modern day and age for standards with so many new manufacturer
Several members of the Slack VHF group have commented that JTDX is
decoding more signals than 2.2.2. Seeing that, I've started running both
programs in parallel. Since I use VOX, that's easy to do.
What I'm seeing is similar to my experience simultaneously running MMTTY
and 2TONE for RTTY cont
