lists.
73
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu]
Sent: 25 June 2015 21:04
To: 'WSJT software development'
Subject: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
Hi all,
My, you've been busy here -- lots of very impressive progress! Many
thanks to all of you contributors
Hi all,
My, you've been busy here -- lots of very impressive progress! Many
thanks to all of you contributors to the WSJT-related projects!
[Brief aside: My wife and I thoroughly enjoyed our 8-day cruise --
Venice to Athens, with stopovers at ports on the Dalmatian coast: Split,
Korcula,
A really good idea, Joe. Elecraft has always made a point of involving
their customers, and it has gotten them a lot of useful input.
73, Jim K9YC
On Thu,9/11/2014 10:17 AM, Joe Taylor wrote:
1. We plan to make a beta release soon.
2. Here's a short list of new features...
3. Here's a link
Hi Bill and Joe,
1) What version of Qt are you compiling against?Qt5.2.1?I compiled a
local version of Qt5.2.1 from source following your suggestion to be able to
get full c++11 support.But qt-project now has 5.3.1 available. Have you
(or anyone) used this and should we
: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 19:40, John Nelson wrote:
Hi Bill and Joe,
Hi John,
1) What version of Qt are you compiling against?Qt5.2.1?I
compiled a local version of Qt5.2.1 from source following your suggestion to
be able to get full c++11 support.But qt-project now has
: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 20:04, Michael Black wrote:
Hi Mike,
When is hamlib-3 used? At least for my build on Windows 7 hamlib2 is
what is used and ends up in the install.
If you are using the latest JTSDK on you should be linking in Hamlib-3 built
from my fork of the Hamlib
On 11/09/2014 22:05, Bill Somerville wrote:
No Hamlib DLLs which is what you have below - all is OK now.
Oops, no it's not. That libhamlib-2.dll should not be there. I suspect
it is old and not put there by the build you have just done.
Try nuking the install directory and running the build
On 11/09/2014 22:08, Michael Black wrote:
Hi Mike,
But what about hamlib-3.dll?
Not required - we statically link Hamlib for now so as not to clash with
any other application that uses Hamlib-2.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
--
Want
PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 19:40, John Nelson wrote:
Hi Bill and Joe,
Hi John,
1) What version of Qt are you compiling against?Qt5.2.1?I
compiled a local version of Qt5.2.1 from source following your suggestion
On 11/09/2014 21:43, KI7MT wrote:
Hi Bill, Mike,
Hi Greg,
Just FYI
I just built both Debug and Release install targets, and the only thing
Hamlib related in the Build Tree are the .cpp.obj and .cpp files, which
should be there I would expect.
The install directories are clear of any
Hi Bill,
See below,
On 9/11/2014 21:24, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 11/09/2014 21:43, KI7MT wrote:
Hi Bill, Mike,
Hi Greg,
Just FYI
I just built both Debug and Release install targets, and the only thing
Hamlib related in the Build Tree are the .cpp.obj and .cpp files, which
should be
that
hamlib3 one.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 4:09 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 22:05, Bill Somerville wrote:
No Hamlib DLLs which is what you have
.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 4:09 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 22:05, Bill Somerville wrote:
No Hamlib DLLs which is what
]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 4:48 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 22:42, Michael Black wrote:
Hi Mike,
Nope...removed the whole JTSDK-QT\wsjtx directory and rebuilt build
wsjtx rinstall
I had a copy of libhamlib-2.dll in my C
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 4:48 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 22:42, Michael Black wrote:
Hi Mike,
Nope...removed the whole JTSDK-QT\wsjtx
[mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:00 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 22:50, Michael Black wrote:
snip
//Path to a library.
hamlib_STATIC_LIBRARY:FILEPATH=hamlib_STATIC_LIBRARY-NOTFOUND
snip
The above
in your case.
snip
73
Bill
G4WJS.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:00 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 22:50, Michael Black wrote:
snip
//Path
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 23:08, Michael Black wrote:
Hi Mike,
OK...removed the wsjtx tree and build wsjtx rconfig
Still not found
What file is it looking for?
OK, I need to see the output of the build wsjtx rconfig step please.
And why does hamlib3
-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 23:21, Michael Black wrote:
Hi Mike,
in the drectory
/JTSDK-QT/hamlib3/mingw32/lib
is there a file named libhamlib.a
?
73
Bill
G4WJS.
--
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your
the static archive (./configure --enable-static ...).
Mike W9MDB
73
Bill
G4WJS.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:37 PM
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 23
Requires.private:
Cflags: -I${includedir}
Libs: -L${libdir} -lhamlib
Libs.private:
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:44 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 23:40
but not being picked
up correctly in the configuration phase in your case.
snip
73
Bill
G4WJS.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:00 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back
...).
Mike W9MDB
73
Bill
G4WJS.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:37 PM
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 23:21, Michael Black wrote:
Hi Mike,
in the drectory
On 12/09/2014 00:04, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 11/09/2014 23:57, KI7MT wrote:
Hi Bill,
Hi Greg,
Yup, I think that's the issue. I've never been able to build Hamlib3 on
Windows, only on Linux. My current version was from one of your DropBox
Downloads I believe.
I can Zip up my version and
archive (./configure --enable-static ...).
Mike W9MDB
73
Bill
G4WJS.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:37 PM
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 23:21, Michael Black
Hi all,
I'm home again after recent travels, once again getting back up to speed
on all the good things done by others.
We have a lot of good new code, documentation, and development aids in
the repository. Can we agree that it's reasonable to plan for a beta
release of WSJT-X v1.4 before
On 04/09/2014 19:24, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Joe,
I'm home again after recent travels, once again getting back up to speed
on all the good things done by others.
Hope the travels were enjoyable, I gather from Dave G4RGK that the WX in
France wasn't too pleasant.
We have a lot of good
Hi Bill and all,
Hope the travels were enjoyable, I gather from Dave G4RGK that the WX in
France wasn't too pleasant.
Some rain, to be sure. But we had a delightful time nevertheless!
Thanks for detailing the remaining issues you're aware of in WSJT-X v1.4.
I'm working on bringing the User
On 04/09/2014 21:37, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Bill and all,
Hi Joe,
Hope the travels were enjoyable, I gather from Dave G4RGK that the WX in
France wasn't too pleasant.
Some rain, to be sure. But we had a delightful time nevertheless!
Thanks for detailing the remaining issues you're aware of
Hi Joe, Bill, All,
While there may be issues, I'd have to say v1.4 has allot of nice
features over v1.3. I've had very few problems overall, both on
Windows and Linux. A couple were my own doing. With the FT-2KD, it's
been very stable, though I don't often use all the advanced features.
If
30 matches
Mail list logo
