DXCC and not quite right. I
am sure that this will be remedied soon.
73
Conrad PA5Y
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel
Sent: 19 October 2021 19:56
To: Conrad PA5Y via wsjt-devel
Cc: Joe Taylor
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Compound call behaviour Q65
Hi Conrad,
What is
Hello Joe et all
certainly Lance is making QSO's but seemingly only with the stronger
stations or when he has ground gain. When he is Transmitting on any of the
TX2 TX3 lines the smaller stations (like myself and many others in VK) see
a reasonable trace but very little if anything is decoded from
r
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Compound call behaviour Q65
Hi Conrad,
What is the status of the FO/W7GJ expedition? Is Lance making 6m EME QSOs as
planned? I am concerned that he may not have adequately tested use of a
compound callsign in JT65 and Q65 modes with WSJT-X 2.5.0.
We have ident
gh to download an installation
package, I don't know.
73
Chris
G4IFX
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel
Sent: 19 October 2021 18:56
To: Conrad PA5Y via wsjt-devel
Cc: Joe Taylor
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Compound call behaviour Q65
Hi Conrad,
What is the status of t
Hi Conrad,
What is the status of the FO/W7GJ expedition? Is Lance making 6m EME
QSOs as planned? I am concerned that he may not have adequately tested
use of a compound callsign in JT65 and Q65 modes with WSJT-X 2.5.0.
We have identified four problems that are likely affecting Lance's
oper
decoder fully yet.
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
From: Charles Suckling via wsjt-devel
Sent: 18 October 2021 18:14
To: WSJT software development
Cc: Charles Suckling
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Compound call behaviour Q65
Hi Conrad
I'm not sure there is any need to change the program with urgency. I
On 10/18/2021 12:10 PM, Conrad PA5Y via wsjt-devel wrote:
Well typically Lance asks that if you decode him you start with TX2.
To conserve battery/generator fuel, Lance does not call CQ on
expeditions, directing callers to call blind, and answering those he
copies. In that situation, callers
Sent: 18 October 2021 18:16
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Bill Somerville
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Compound call behaviour Q65
Hi Conrad,
it is already fixed for the next release. I'm not sure I understand what why
you think it is so urgent, please detail a typical QSO seq
e.net
*Cc:* Bill Somerville
*Subject:* Re: [wsjt-devel] Compound call behaviour Q65
On 18/10/2021 11:09, Conrad PA5Y via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hello team.
Last night I was attempting to work FO/W7GJ on Q65-60A. My
question is about the population of TX4 and TX5.
When I Generate sta
s there right now. Any chance that
> this can be fixed as a matter of some urgency please
>
>
>
> 73
>
>
>
> Conrad PA5Y
>
>
>
> *From:* Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
> *Sent:* 18 October 2021 15:02
> *To:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Cc:* Bill
-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Bill Somerville
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Compound call behaviour Q65
On 18/10/2021 11:09, Conrad PA5Y via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hello team.
Last night I was attempting to work FO/W7GJ on Q65-60A. My question is about
the population of TX4 and TX5.
When I Generate
On 18/10/2021 11:09, Conrad PA5Y via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hello team.
Last night I was attempting to work FO/W7GJ on Q65-60A. My question is
about the population of TX4 and TX5.
When I Generate standard messages, I see TX1-3 are correct.
TX1 PA5Y JO21
TX2 PA5Y -27
TX3
Hello team.
Last night I was attempting to work FO/W7GJ on Q65-60A. My question is about
the population of TX4 and TX5.
When I Generate standard messages, I see TX1-3 are correct.
TX1 PA5Y JO21
TX2 PA5Y -27
TX3 PA5Y R-27
However, the compound call is omitted from TX4
This may have already been reported but couldn't find it. Attempted to
work a call K4XXX/4 and auto-sequence didn't work. Could not even send
the selected macro. Kept sending his/her report so had to abandon contact.
Bobby/N4AU
--
n...@outlook.com
__
Hi all,
this is probably not a bug, but it's a trap for new players!
I'm using a compound call. Occasionally my CQ will get answered by
another compound call. But, the FT8 format doesn't have room for a
payload, when we both have a compound call.
THEM
ME
THEM
ME
On it goes, until I realise
On 18/09/2018 17:23, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
I know compound calls aren't supported in the 2.0 version for the
75-bit messages...but
If you put a compound call in the DX Call box (like from
double-clicking) and generate std msgsthen remove the compound
from the call and ge
I know compound calls aren't supported in the 2.0 version for the 75-bit
messages...but
If you put a compound call in the DX Call box (like from double-clicking) and
generate std msgsthen remove the compound from the call and generate again
all the TX boxes get changed except TX 5 which
17 matches
Mail list logo
