Re: [wsjt-devel] JT65 decoder status

2016-01-01 Thread Guy G4DWV/4X1LT
Bill Somerville writes: > > > On 01/01/2016 18:20, Guy G4DWV/4X1LT > wrote: > > > Sri but I still cannot find anything that looks as if it will fit the bill. > Looking in the main program window and file > settings > advanced. I am > checking in the latest build I can get

Re: [wsjt-devel] JT65 decoder status

2016-01-01 Thread Bill Somerville
On 01/01/2016 18:20, Guy G4DWV/4X1LT wrote: Sri but I still cannot find anything that looks as if it will fit the bill. Looking in the main program window and file > settings > advanced. I am checking in the latest build I can get using JTSDK, viz 6195. Updated everything as usual before compilin

Re: [wsjt-devel] JT65 decoder status

2016-01-01 Thread Guy G4DWV/4X1LT
Bill Somerville writes: > > On 31/12/2015 19:21, Joe Taylor wrote: > > Set Mode to JT65 (not JT9+JT65). The Ftol widget is then made visible. > You will need to check "Enable VHF/UHF Features" in "Settings->General" > as well. > > 73 > Bill > G4WJS. > > --

Re: [wsjt-devel] JT65 decoder status

2016-01-01 Thread Joe Taylor
Hi Mike, On 12/31/2015 5:04 PM, Michael Black wrote: > It seems as though once aggressive decoding is turned on you can't decode > JT65 with JT9 any more. All you get is JT9 decodes in the combo mode. Thanks for pointing out this anomalous behavior. As I assume you must understand, our attentio

Re: [wsjt-devel] JT65 decoder status

2016-01-01 Thread Barry Jackson
Not sure if this is related, but I am testing 6330 in WSPR mode and I am seeing triple decodes of strong signals the main one and then two others at approx +/-30Hz about 25dB down e.g.: 1504 -21 -0.97.0400380 DF2JP JO31 30417 15047 -0.97.0400701 DF2JP

Re: [wsjt-devel] JT65 decoder status

2015-12-31 Thread Bill Somerville
On 31/12/2015 23:09, Michael Black wrote: > OKcapeeshbut does that mean mode should be forced to JT65 and > combo mode disabled? Perhaps with a dialog box to 'splain things? Hi Mike, until it is decided if the aggressive mode is of any use on HF, no. If it is not useful i.e. creates fal

Re: [wsjt-devel] JT65 decoder status

2015-12-31 Thread Michael Black
OKcapeeshbut does that mean mode should be forced to JT65 and combo mode disabled? Perhaps with a dialog box to 'splain things? RRR Mike W9MDB On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: > On 31/12/2015 22:32, Michael Black wrote: > > The it's backwardsif you're only su

Re: [wsjt-devel] JT65 decoder status

2015-12-31 Thread Bill Somerville
On 31/12/2015 22:32, Michael Black wrote: > The it's backwardsif you're only supposed to do JT65 with > aggressivebut all you can receive is JT9. > > I kind of thought Joe's point was to allow some aggressive decoding on HF. You can try out the JT65 decoder in aggressive mode on HF if you

Re: [wsjt-devel] JT65 decoder status

2015-12-31 Thread Michael Black
The it's backwardsif you're only supposed to do JT65 with aggressivebut all you can receive is JT9. I kind of thought Joe's point was to allow some aggressive decoding on HF. RRR Mike W9MDB On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: > On 31/12/2015 22:04, Michael Black wro

Re: [wsjt-devel] JT65 decoder status

2015-12-31 Thread Bill Somerville
On 31/12/2015 22:04, Michael Black wrote: > It seems as though once aggressive decoding is turned on you can't > decode JT65 with JT9 any more. All you get is JT9 decodes in the > combo mode. Hi Mike, for now that is not unreasonable. Aggressive decoding is intended for VHF & up where you will

Re: [wsjt-devel] JT65 decoder status

2015-12-31 Thread Molnar, George J
2015 2:04:34 PM Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] JT65 decoder status It seems as though once aggressive decoding is turned on you can't decode JT65 with JT9 any more. All you get is JT9 decodes in the combo mode. RRR Mike W9MDB On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: On 31/1

Re: [wsjt-devel] JT65 decoder status

2015-12-31 Thread Michael Black
It seems as though once aggressive decoding is turned on you can't decode JT65 with JT9 any more. All you get is JT9 decodes in the combo mode. RRR Mike W9MDB On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: > On 31/12/2015 19:21, Joe Taylor wrote: > > Set Mode to JT65 (not JT9+JT65).

Re: [wsjt-devel] JT65 decoder status

2015-12-31 Thread Bill Somerville
On 31/12/2015 19:21, Joe Taylor wrote: > Set Mode to JT65 (not JT9+JT65). The Ftol widget is then made visible. You will need to check "Enable VHF/UHF Features" in "Settings->General" as well. 73 Bill G4WJS. --

Re: [wsjt-devel] JT65 decoder status

2015-12-31 Thread Joe Taylor
On 12/31/2015 1:09 PM, Guy G4DWV/4X1LT wrote: > Joe Taylor writes: > > > >> Normal operation at HF should set "Aggressive decoding level" to 0. >> If you try operating on HF with higher values, be sure to set Ftol=1000. >>With higher values of Aggressive decoding level you will see a few >>

Re: [wsjt-devel] JT65 decoder status

2015-12-31 Thread Guy G4DWV/4X1LT
Joe Taylor writes: > Normal operation at HF should set "Aggressive decoding level" to 0. > If you try operating on HF with higher values, be sure to set Ftol=1000. > With higher values of Aggressive decoding level you will see a few > more decodes, and also some false decodes. -

Re: [wsjt-devel] JT65 decoder status

2015-12-31 Thread Joe Taylor
Hi Steve and all, In case you have built WSJT-X v1.7 from r6329 and used it on the HF bands, you'll surely see many more false decodes than usual. As committed, the code uses aggressive values for the parameters d_0 and r_0. These values may be appropriate for EME-like conditions, but surely