David, from wsprd.c src code, not quite plain text but something!
fprintf(fall_wspr,
"%6s %4s %3d %3.0f %5.2f %11.7f %-22s %2d %5u %4d %4d
%4d %2u\n",
decodes[i].date, decodes[i].time,
(int)(10*decodes[i].sync),
decodes[i].snr, decodes[i].dt,
This message answers some questions I had about the ALL_WSPR.TXT file.
Since I started using the WSPR mode of WSJTX the number of fields in a
ALL_WSPR.TXT
line has been increasing.
Is there a plain text explanation (one that doesn't involve reading
through the source code)
of all the items ?
Hi Steve,
I was not aware of the additional command line flags until your email and a
chat from Jim. It does increase CPU utilization enough that a Pi can no
longer perform two wsprd decodes on each of the 11 bands, so I have divided
the bands across 2 Pis.
In addition, I have modified my script
Jim,
The number in question is the total Fano path metric for the returned codeword.
When the last number is 1, that means that the Fano algorithm failed. In such
cases, the path metric is just set to its maximum possible value, 810.
Steve k9an
> On Oct 28, 2018, at 11:31 AM, Jim Lill wrote:
Steve,
What does the number before the 0 or 1 in ALL_WSPR.TXT represent? I see
it as 810 when there's a 1 (new algo) decode
-Jim wa2zkd
On 10/28/2018 12:28 AM, Steven Franke via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hi Rob -
Are you using the same command-line arguments that WSJT-X uses when it
calls the
Hi Rob -
Are you using the same command-line arguments that WSJT-X uses when it calls
the decoder? The “Deep” decode setting in WSJT-X v2.0.0-rc3 uses “-C 5000 -o
4”.
Also, it is essential that the decoder in v2.0.0 have access to a
well-populated hashtable.txt. Briefly, the enhanced
Hi Steve,
Jim's question was stimulated by tests I have been running at KPH to
compare the decode performance of the wsprd in 1.9.1 against the wsprd in
2.0rc3
My test setup is located at KPH where I have one KiwiSDR fed by a 3-30 Mhz
TCI-530 and a second KiwiSDR fed from a Marconi T. I don't
> On Oct 26, 2018, at 2:21 PM, Jim Lill wrote:
>
> What is the method to verify my system is indeed enjoying the 1 dB SNR
> improvement that 2.0 gives?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jim
>
> WA2ZKD
Hi Jim,
You might try turning on “Save All” and running for, say, 24 hours or even a
couple of days. Then
What is the method to verify my system is indeed enjoying the 1 dB SNR
improvement that 2.0 gives?
Thanks
Jim
WA2ZKD
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
