While true that JTDX will decode a few more signals it comes at a price that
being greater CPU use and it does not have the decode speed of WSJTX. From a
long time JTDX user that uses both programs.
73 Morris WA4MIT
On Friday, July 3, 2020, 11:20:58 PM CDT, Jim Brown
wrote:
Several m
Hi Folks.
Just picked up on Adrians' comments.
I can confirm that I am seeing the same issue with 2.2.2. Initial station
call at plus-something, the subsequent overs still at plus-something, but
no decodes. Does not do it all the time.
Wondered if it may have just been down to QRM, too many st
What I am noticing in 2.2.2 is a consistent pattern when responding to a
good signal call and then not seeing further decoded response from that
station (despite seeing the waterfall response) until I either ;
1. Halt TX and then will see the sequenced response decode, or
2, Click back to my TX
Jim,
A very appropriate comment based on some email chats here going on in the
background. Background discussion that I have been having relates around the
"standards" discussion opened earlier in the week and the necessity in this
modern day and age for standards with so many new manufacturer
