> On Feb 2, 2021, at 4:56 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
>
> With FST4, is there an advantage to using narrower decode bandwidth and/or
> narrower frequency tolerance?
>
> Jim K9YC
Jim,
The GUI controls (FTol for FST4W and FLow/FHigh for FST4) determine the upper
and lower limits of the candidate
I installed version 2.3.0 this evening and ran into two issues…one easily
resolvable…the other not. The resolvable issue was that 2.3.0 didn’t recognize
my USB soundcard initially (SignaLink USB), reporting “none”. I was able to
reset it to the USB codec properly.
But in operation, after
On 2/2/2021 3:18 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
if you mean a narrower waterfall/spectrum bandwidth for the former, then
that doesn't make much difference. As always it is best to match your
receiver's bandwidth.
I was thinking of when the single decode is not checked.
The frequency tolerance
Hi wsjt-devel,
I'd like to get involved with WSJT-X development (I've enjoyed using it and
want to help improve it for other hams). I'm new to working
on sourceforage projects, more familiar with github issue/PR process. Where
do you track inprogress/requested features? Is there something I
On 02/02/2021 22:56, Jim Brown wrote:
With FST4, is there an advantage to using narrower decode bandwidth
and/or narrower frequency tolerance?
Jim K9YC
Hi Jim,
if you mean a narrower waterfall/spectrum bandwidth for the former, then
that doesn't make much difference. As always it is best
With FST4, is there an advantage to using narrower decode bandwidth
and/or narrower frequency tolerance?
Jim K9YC
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
