On 11/04/2017 23:53, Black Michael wrote:
W isn't in the lookup table for prefixes.
Getting rid of the k check seems to work for all.
Hi Mike,
here's what happens with the example above before your patch:
C:\Users\bill>\test-install\wsjtx-dev\Release\bin\jt65code.exe "cq w/g4wjs io91"
W isn't in the lookup table for prefixes.Getting rid of the k check seems to
work for all.Looks to me like the whole section above this for prefix/suffix is
redundant or basically has been replaced by the new logic for JT65V2If I'm
following the logic correctly as long as there is a slash in
On 11/04/2017 19:57, Black Michael wrote:
This seems to fix both my problem and yours.
Index: packjt.f90
===
--- packjt.f90 (revision 7634)
+++ packjt.f90 (working copy)
@@ -754,7 +754,7 @@
enddo
endif
- 10
Hiya
There is one huge difference between wsjtx and all the other clones and so
called better systems.
You can run wsjtx and wsjt on all platforms.
Thats very important and demomstrates a highly professional approach to
providing for all user.
Long may it continue and thanks for developing
Hi James and Neil,
You're correct on all points.
As you imply, JT10 is a "JT" mode only to the extent that (like the rest
of JTDX) most of its code is taken directly from WSJT-X.
As far as I can tell, JT10 is JT9 with the sync pattern conveyed by
means of 2-FSK rather than OOK (On-Off
On 11/04/2017 07:00, Claude Frantz wrote:
On 04/11/2017 12:35 AM, Black Michael wrote:
I"m running r7634 QRP at 2 watts and when I change message 5 to from the
standard "DE W9MDB/QRP 73" to "DE W9MDB/QRP 2W" it shows the transmitted
messages as all sorts of random messages.
Hi Mike & all,
At
On 04/11/2017 12:35 AM, Black Michael wrote:
> I"m running r7634 QRP at 2 watts and when I change message 5 to from the
> standard "DE W9MDB/QRP 73" to "DE W9MDB/QRP 2W" it shows the transmitted
> messages as all sorts of random messages.
Hi Mike & all,
At my knowledge and in contrast to "/P",
