Of course, 400W should be the average power of the amplifier, not the peak
power.
Splitting the power unevenly between the messages (in favor of the callers on a difficult path) may improve the peak to average
power ratio.
73 Alex VE3NEA
On 2017-08-20 16:15, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Rich, Ne
PS - I'll have more to say about possible DXpedition operating
procedures, but probably not until tomorrow.
-- Joe, K1JT
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Sl
Hi Rich, Ned, Alex, and all,
On 8/20/2017 2:15 PM, Alex, VE3NEA wrote:
Hi Ned,
Your picture of the future FT8 pileups of the top-ten DXpeditions is
very realistic but very scary. ...
... A 400 W linear amplifier will easily transmit 10 x 40W
signals if it is linear enough.
Surely this is
Hi Ned,
Your picture of the future FT8 pileups of the top-ten DXpeditions is very realistic but very scary. As a DX'er, I realize that
none of the usual pileup cracking techniques that I use in CW and RTTY are going to work in this scenario, and I will have very
little control over the things.
Pino,
since WSJT-X uses a logging file, rather than a transaction safe
database server, the certain way of doing what you want to do is to keep
the two direct logs from WSJT-X separate, and then subsequently to use
those files as input to a separate logging program. Otherwise there is
the ris
Rich,
I would like to add some perspective of what might happen when what is
called a "Top Ten" DXpedition (a DXCC entity that is in the Top Ten
slots in published need lists...examples being Bouvet and Baker Island
that will be QRV early next year) takes place on RTTY (or any digitial)
mode.
Additional 20 M FT8 frequencies for DXpeditions & general DX use
The question has been posed as to the best frequencies for DXpeditions while
operating the FT8 mode.
Lets focus on 20 Meters, which wi
Hi,
On 08/20/2017 02:20 AM, Joe Taylor wrote:
Ned, AA7A, made a seemingly good point about needing handy use of
function keys for controlling progress of a QSO. DXped ops "never use a
mouse", etc., etc. With a multi-decoding system like FT8 likely
producing decodes from 30 or more eager calle
Yes...the ADIF file is used for WSJT-X's B4. JTAlert is a much better and more
powerful solution for that though.
de Mike W9MDB
From: Pino Zollo
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2017 7:23 AM
Subject: [wsjt-devel] Two instances
El 19/08/17 a las 2
Richard --
There is no 1.8.0-rc2 release yet, as you must know. Consequently there
is no WSJT-X User Guide with "1.8.0-rc2" in its file name.
If you are building for yourself and have not turned off the option that
builds docs, you should be creating the Local User Guide.
Anyway, the link
El 19/08/17 a las 22:32, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net escribió:
> I think as long as you're logging only one at a time you should be OK since
> the logging files are opened and closed pretty quickly.
> It's the ALL.TXT file that could be a problem during decoding as that can all
> h
Hi all,
Ubuntu 16.04
1.8.0-rc2 r8028
Help->Online User Guide results in:
The requested URL /pulsar/K1JT/wsjtx-doc/wsjtx-main-1.8.0-rc2.html was
not found on this server.
Help->Local User Guide doesn't bring up anything.
73,
Richard G4DYA
--
Like Rich I have a bit of experience in regards to digital (8 band dxcc).
The operating process suggested by Rich has lots of merit and is the way all
stations that constantly have 3 or 4 or more stations calling should use.
Steve
VK6IR
From: Rich - K1HTV
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2017 2:15 A
-As Alex says I think the DXpeds will do the opposite to the normal SSB/CW
and will not want to mess with the key board much, just let the computer log
the calls.
With the "spare time and free hands" that this will create I'm sure they
will want to be able to choose the station easily with the
14 matches
Mail list logo
