On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:11:19 +0100
"Martin Davies G0HDB" wrote:
> The use of Split is all-but essential for slick operation in Hound mode,
> which is presumably
> why the software complained if you changed to a Hound configuration without
> one or other of
> the Split options being selected.
Thanks Joe, Steve, and Bill. This looks very good.
1. Where do you want folks to submit their feedback after using the RC? You
all seem to be good at dealing with the firehose of emails coming in to
wsjt-devel, but maybe you want to set up something just for this.
2. Any chance of having "Best
Thanks to Dany Bélanger, VE2EBK, for translating "The FT4 Protocol for
Digital Contesting" into French.
I have posted the translation here:
http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/FT4_Protocol_fr.pdf
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
___
wsjt-devel mailing
Hi All,
waiting for 2.1 source code release (where I hope the problem is
corrected) found a simple patch for old "LONG" modes
// nice idea new all.txt
// aligned text with time and frequency every line
// but some problems with 1 minute modes (JT9 JT65 JT9+JT65) :
// - lost character from
Those files haven't been used in quite a while.
And with the development source not available anymore it's impossible to keep
up with recent changes.
So you're left with using the main hamlib git repository if you want to keep
up-to-date.
I just changed my git location to refer to there instead
in .../src/wsjt.../INSTALL:
"Patching Sources
This build script includes source patching capabilities. The sources
for Hamlib and those for WSJT-X may have a patch applied automatically
prior to configuration and building. Any patches required must be
contained in one of
HI !
Few questions about new release and FT4
- I assume the core of UDP does not change (at least a lot). What
is the "mode letter" selected for FT4 in #2, Decode message ?
- Will v2.10-rc5's N1MM+ UDP message contain ADIF tags STX, SRX,
STXString, SRXString ?
- Does
Hi All
I don’t want to assume so will ask - FT4 aimed at ‘Contest Friendly digital
modes’ - cool - BUT will it cater for the pile of weird contest rules that are
out there. The abundance of requests for QSO Parties, Field Days where
non-standards messages. Heck for us UK VHF types - 6
Thanks to Miguel Iborra, EA4BAS, for translating "The FT4 Protocol for
Digital Contesting" into Spanish.
I have posted the translation here:
http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/FT4_Protocol_es.pdf
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
___
wsjt-devel mailing
Looks like there haven't been any updates to the WSJTX default hamlib
repository since Mar 15 so the latest IC-9700 fixes aren't in there. I believe
you are using my fork right now.
What build instructions are you referring to?
de Mike W9MDB
On Tuesday, April 23, 2019, 8:34:12 AM CDT,
hi Mike,
sort of. I know I can put the branch I have at the same place but the build
instructions of wsjt-x talk a bout specific patches that
are/were not included yet to have wsjt-x working correctly.
Roeland
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 3:17 PM Black Michael via wsjt-devel <
On 22 Apr 2019 at 17:22, Frank Kirschner wrote:
> OK. How do I tell whether it's a F/H mode station or a "derivative"
> program? Most of the time, when I switch to F/H mode to work DX, I am able
> to work them. Does that indicate the DX station is, indeed, running F/H?
Frank:
If the station you
If you mean the IC-9700 specifically that has been incorporated in the 4.0
branch of hamlib and should appear in the next release of WSJT-X.
de Mike W9MDB
On Tuesday, April 23, 2019, 7:50:14 AM CDT, Roeland Jansen
wrote:
In the build instructions there have been notes about hamlib
In the build instructions there have been notes about hamlib not having the
patches
merged into their code yet.
Now, we're seeing hamlib v4.x ; Is that still the case that patches are not
merged?
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
14 matches
Mail list logo
