That also works for me.
Alan G0TLK, sent from my mobile device
On 16 June 2021 23:40:03 Jon Anhold wrote:
I would say that what WSJT-X refers to as "Configurations" are commonly
called "Profiles".
73 de KM8V
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 12:12 PM Bill Somerville wrote:
Hi Alan,
both of your
I would say that what WSJT-X refers to as "Configurations" are commonly
called "Profiles".
73 de KM8V
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 12:12 PM Bill Somerville
wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> both of your suggestions fall at the first hurdle since WSJT-X
> Configurations are neither presets nor are they specific
Hi Alan,
both of your suggestions fall at the first hurdle since WSJT-X
Configurations are neither presets nor are they specific to modes.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 16/06/2021 16:54, al...@alangroups.plus.com wrote:
Could I suggest a change of name from "Configurations" to something a
bit more
Could I suggest a change of name from "Configurations" to something a
bit more intuitive, maybe "User preset modes" or "User presets"? Might
help with understanding their power.
Alan G0TLK
On 16/06/2021 16:24, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Roger,
On 6/15/2021 5:06 PM, Roger Shultz via wsjt-devel
Hi Roger,
On 6/15/2021 5:06 PM, Roger Shultz via wsjt-devel wrote:
As an EME operator I find a couple things that is lacking when using WSJT-X.
Comparing a missing feature to WSJT10 for example, it is very nice to
have the ability to see the Astronomical Data panel. Not everyone will
want
Hi Bill,
As an EME operator I find a couple things that is lacking when
using WSJT-X.
Comparing a missing feature to WSJT10 for example, it is very nice
to have the ability to see the Astronomical Data panel. Not
everyone will want this if not operating EME so could it be a
check box in
