Re: [wsjt-devel] 1.9 rc2 windows size

Hi Jerry, I was quite busy with KH6CW yesterday... As for the new version, just wait for the release V1.9.0 rc2 is release candidate. I use both V1.8.0 and V1.9.0 rc2 under Windows 10 64 bit version. You will have another mail. A forward. Good testing! gl de ha6nn Andras On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at

Re: [wsjt-devel] 1.9 rc2 windows size

Jerry and all, I'm so sorry for mistaking you with another Jerry! I did not want to write to the forum, please excuse me! Otherwise I really can cut the lower or upper half of the 3000 Hz wide FT8 subband using DSP, etc. gl de ha6nn Andras On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 8:59 AM, Andras Bato

Re: [wsjt-devel] Public test of FT8 DXpedition mode March 6-7

Bonjour Jean, On 3/5/2018 2:45 AM, Jean Raynaud F8RZ wrote: Disappointed by the timing, which practically precludes EU from participating... And yet, if you want to see the effectiveness in difficult conditions, what better QRM generator than EU can you find ? tongue in cheek... ! Yes, if

Re: [wsjt-devel] Public test of FT8 DXpedition mode March 6-7

It also might not be a bad thing if some well-meaning but otherwise uninformed ops running 1.8 wander into the "pileup" as it may help simulate real-world conditions where this may also happen with more frequency. Though they may not decode the "fox" I've seen any number of times where people will

Re: [wsjt-devel] Public test of FT8 DXpedition mode March 6-7

On 3/4/2018 8:12 PM, David Fisher NX6D wrote: I’m curious to know what will happen when someone wanders into these tests, without RC2, and tries to send one of the messages not used in these abbreviated sequences.  Will those callers be ignored? Only Fox sends a new type of message -- that

Re: [wsjt-devel] Public test of FT8 DXpedition mode March 6-7

Hi Joe, I will be in V26 this weekend (if the storm on wed allows it). Would be willing to be the FOX if need be to put some load on the code. 73 Lee WW2DX > On Mar 5, 2018, at 2:09 PM, James Shaver wrote: > > It also might not be a bad thing if some well-meaning but

Re: [wsjt-devel] Public test of FT8 DXpedition mode March 6-7

Bonjour Jean, On 3/5/2018 2:45 AM, Jean Raynaud F8RZ wrote: Disappointed by the timing, which practically precludes EU from participating... And yet, if you want to see the effectiveness in difficult conditions, what better QRM generator than EU can you find ? tongue in cheek... ! Yes,

Re: [wsjt-devel] Public test of FT8 DXpedition mode March 6-7

Hi, being hound, I have not clear if set up split operation as Rig or Fake it. Can please explain... if rig how to set the TX freq. on the rig ? TU de Pino ZP4kfx -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of

[wsjt-devel] Always on the visible working area

I have two displays ... One is dedicated to WSJT-X; the other to WEB and other applications. I am on Linux Mint 18.3. Right clicking on the top bar of wsjt-x I set "Always on the visible working area". The problem is that this setting does not last very muchafter a while of using

Re: [wsjt-devel] Public test of FT8 DXpedition mode March 6-7

On 05/03/2018 21:30, Pino Zollo wrote: Hi, being hound, I have not clear if set up split operation as Rig or Fake it. Can please explain... if rig how to set the TX freq. on the rig ? TU de Pino ZP4kfx Hi Pino, just the same as with other modes of operation, either "Rig" or "Fake It"

Re: [wsjt-devel] Always on the visible working area

On 05/03/2018 21:33, Pino Zollo wrote: I have two displays ... One is dedicated to WSJT-X; the other to WEB and other applications. I am on Linux Mint 18.3. Right clicking on the top bar of wsjt-x I set "Always on the visible working area". The problem is that this setting does not

Re: [wsjt-devel] Public test of FT8 DXpedition mode March 6-7

Jim has made the point I was heading towards. Even when 1.9 is released publically, there will be plenty of users of older versions and some will jump into fray. In a test, it’s not very likely there will be much QRM. In the real world, when a rare DX is at stake, I expect it could be quite

Re: [wsjt-devel] Public test of FT8 DXpedition mode March 6-7

Dave -- All understood. Rest assured, we have already spent plenty of time thinking about -- and testing -- the sort of complications you describe. No doubt we will still have some surprises. Some will be ones we have foreseen, others probably not. That's precisely why we are doing more

Re: [wsjt-devel] Public test of FT8 DXpedition mode March 6-7

Joe Thanks for the reply. In the spirit of trying to make useful suggestions rather than just complaining, let me suggest that once 1.9 is released to the public, that some additional demonstrations of the new mode be conducted so that the public could get some practice with it before a

Re: [wsjt-devel] Public test of FT8 DXpedition mode March 6-7

Dave -- On 3/5/2018 5:46 PM, David Fisher NX6D wrote: ... let me suggest that once 1.9 is released to the public, that some additional demonstrations of the new mode be conducted so that the public could get some practice with it before a real DXPedition starts using it. 

[wsjt-devel] The native foxes and hounds are restless

Something interesting up on my screen early one morning on 80m ... also getting warnings from the new WSJT-X about maybe I should be turning on the fox/hounds mode. Too sleepy to deal with it at that time of the day. Looking forward to the tests - might get through on the 20m one ...

[wsjt-devel] Audio input from RTP stream?

How hard would it be for WJST to accept receive audio from a RTP (Real Time Protocol) multicast network stream? RTP is *the* standard for voice over IP (VoIP). It runs over UDP/IP, usually as unicast IPv4 but also as multicast IPv4 or IPv6. It's just a streaming protocol that identifies and

Re: [wsjt-devel] The native foxes and hounds are restless

Hi Julian I have seen the warning "Should you be in FT8 Dxpedition Hound mode" when not set to Hound. I can trigger this message using a Fox message including a hashed call eg K1ABC RR73; W9XYZ It only appears, for me, when the correct Fox callsign is in the DX Call box. I guess this is a

Re: [wsjt-devel] Audio input from RTP stream?

> On 6 Mar 2018, at 07:29, Phil Karn wrote: > > How hard would it be for WJST to accept receive audio from a RTP (Real > Time Protocol) multicast network stream? > > My receiver outputs uncompressed audio as a standard RTP/UDP/IP > multicast stream containing mono or stereo

Re: [wsjt-devel] Public test of FT8 DXpedition mode March 6-7

> On 5 Mar 2018, at 00:43, Joe Taylor wrote: > > All participating stations must use program version WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc2. If you > don't yet have it, download links are available here: > https://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/wsjtx.html I won’t be able to take part but