Re: [wsjt-devel] test mail

2021-10-14 Thread Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel
On 14/10/2021 20:22, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi Barry, there have been two of your attempted posts rejected because they were not posted from an email address that is registered on the SourceForge list server. All the rest of you posts to this thread have arrived at the list

Re: [wsjt-devel] test mail

2021-10-14 Thread Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
On 14/10/2021 20:17, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote: On 14/10/2021 20:02, Neil Zampella via wsjt-devel wrote: Where are you sending your 'bug report' ... here, or the Groups.io list?   Two different locations. Good question. I was not aware of a groups.io list or would have used it as I

Re: [wsjt-devel] test mail

2021-10-14 Thread Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel
On 14/10/2021 20:02, Neil Zampella via wsjt-devel wrote: Where are you sending your 'bug report' ... here, or the Groups.io list?   Two different locations. Good question. I was not aware of a groups.io list or would have used it as I have many accounts on there. I have only used this

Re: [wsjt-devel] test mail

2021-10-14 Thread Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel
On 14/10/2021 19:55, Neil Zampella via wsjt-devel wrote: Are you getting the digest version? That said, I saw this at 1:54 PM Central time on the 14th Also, your name & callsign is helpful Neil, KN3ILZ Thanks Neil, I will try sending the original bug report again (if I can find it). The

Re: [wsjt-devel] test mail

2021-10-14 Thread Neil Zampella via wsjt-devel
Where are you sending your 'bug report' ... here, or the Groups.io list?   Two different locations. Neil, KN3ILZ On 10/14/2021 1:44 PM, Barry Jackson wrote: On 14/10/2021 19:33, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote: Does this list really take hours to update? sent at: Thursday, 14 October 2021

Re: [wsjt-devel] test mail

2021-10-14 Thread Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel
On 14/10/2021 19:42, Carey Fisher via wsjt-devel wrote: I read it at 17:42 but it was 5 minutes old then. Yes it's not the list that is slow it is the bouncing process that is taking the time. I don't understand why my other messages are bounced. I will try again - 4th time including one from

Re: [wsjt-devel] test mail

2021-10-14 Thread Neil Zampella via wsjt-devel
Are you getting the digest version? That said, I saw this at 1:54 PM Central time on the 14th Also, your name & callsign is helpful Neil, KN3ILZ On 10/14/2021 1:33 PM, Barry Jackson wrote: Does this list really take hours to update? sent at: Thursday, 14 October 2021 19:32

Re: [wsjt-devel] test mail

2021-10-14 Thread Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel
On 14/10/2021 19:33, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote: Does this list really take hours to update? sent at: Thursday, 14 October 2021 19:32 ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [wsjt-devel] test mail

2021-10-14 Thread Carey Fisher via wsjt-devel
I read it at 17:42 but it was 5 minutes old then. On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 2:36 PM Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Does this list really take hours to update? sent at: > Thursday, 14 October 2021 19:32 > > > ___

[wsjt-devel] test mail

2021-10-14 Thread Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel
Does this list really take hours to update? sent at: Thursday, 14 October 2021 19:32 ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] test email

2021-07-03 Thread Carlos Lemmi
I had problems with my email *w...@arrl.net * it's link to* wb6...@aol.com * my old license. So when I post here, I say *I'm not a member.* I created a new email in Gmail, but Gmail do not allow 4 letter in the name, it has to have at least six so I could not create *w...@gmail.com * and

[wsjt-devel] Test RC builds for Fedora / EL 8

2020-09-29 Thread Richard Shaw
I have created a COPR[1] to perform test builds for upcoming wsjtx 2.3.0. Currently I'm planning on supporting 64bit only (ARM and x86) but can enable any arch COPR supports by request. Thanks, Richard KF5OIM [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/WSJT/

[wsjt-devel] Test - Again

2020-07-01 Thread Stephen VK3SIR
Testing systems yet again; upstream proxy and caching issues under diagnosis. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Test - Do not respond

2020-06-30 Thread Ron WV4P
5/9 04 On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, 9:52 PM Stephen VK3SIR wrote: > T E S T of a new system > > > ___ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >

[wsjt-devel] Test - Do not respond

2020-06-30 Thread Stephen VK3SIR
T E S T of a new system ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] test

2020-06-14 Thread Joe Taylor
test, please ignore ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] Test Results KO3F

2019-06-05 Thread Gary Rogers
47 QSOs in the last 90 minutes - Mac OS version worked fine - Sometimes had trouble keeping up with logging but managed to log all completed QSOs - Had one or two instances where i had worked and logged a station but their color did not turn green - Other than that it was a successful test. 73

Re: [wsjt-devel] Test with DXpedition mode 12 May

2018-05-13 Thread Ton PA0TBR
Hi Bobby, That does work nicely if you prepare for an upcoming DXpedition. But when you come across a DXpedition in progress you want to switch quickly without loosing any information. If you then use Configurations, the software restarts which not only takes time but you also revert to some

Re: [wsjt-devel] Test with DXpedition mode 12 May

2018-05-12 Thread Bobby Chandler
PA0TBR I just set a config for Fox/Hound and only put the frequencies for DXpedition mode in it. Just switch to the config and all OK. Bobby/N4AU bob...@bellsouth.net n...@arrl.net -- Check out the vibrant tech

[wsjt-devel] Test with DXpedition mode 12 May

2018-05-12 Thread Ton PA0TBR
Many thanks for the tests today. I run in the test with v1.9.0-rc4 r8642 With the weak signals today I did notice a problem. During the QSO with K1JT, I was still repeating Tx3 when Joe informed me by pingjockey that I was in the log. Normally I would restart from Tx1 when I time out and have

[wsjt-devel] Test

2018-04-09 Thread jarmo
First hour signal was +3 and I got -24 I started with 20 watts and ended to 200 watts, when I got that -24dB report. Second hour hear best -8dB and started again from 20 watts went up to 1K and didn't get w7/kh7z :(. Tried several places, no lucky. At the end of test last decoded signal was -15dB.

Re: [wsjt-devel] test

2018-04-04 Thread John Cranfield
All received in St Helena Island Nobu. Vy 73 de John ZD7JC St Helena Island -Original Message- From: ja2bqx [mailto:ja2...@proof.ocn.ne.jp] Sent: 04 April 2018 05:39 To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [wsjt-devel] test Hi all, Now test , sorry. http://www.geocities.jp

[wsjt-devel] test

2018-04-04 Thread ja2bqx
Hi all, Now test , sorry. http://www.geocities.jp/ja2bqx/ de JA2BQX nobu -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

[wsjt-devel] Test

2018-03-17 Thread Paul Dukette
Test: after rejection -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ wsjt-devel mailing list

Re: [wsjt-devel] Test

2018-02-19 Thread G8DQX (WSJT developers on SF)
Mike, it is working, but for some reason the mail was seriously delayed within SourceForge, according to the timestamps. You sent it at Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 20:50:41 + (UTC) and it was processed at SourceForge (1st server) Sat, 17 Feb 2018 20:50:44 + and then Received: from

Re: [wsjt-devel] Test

2018-02-19 Thread Laurie, VK3AMA
On 18/02/2018 7:50 AM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: Testing if email group is working yet. de Mike W9MDB Took 2 days (based on your posting date/Time) for it to appear in my inbox. de Laurie VK3AMA -- Check

Re: [wsjt-devel] Test

2018-02-19 Thread Earle
Working. Earle KM4ISN Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 17, 2018, at 3:50 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > Testing if email group is working yet. > > de Mike W9MDB > > --

Re: [wsjt-devel] Test

2018-02-19 Thread James Shaver (N2ADV)
I got the note, Mike. > On Feb 17, 2018, at 3:50 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > Testing if email group is working yet. > > de Mike W9MDB > > -- > Check out the

[wsjt-devel] Test

2018-02-19 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
Testing if email group is working yet. de Mike W9MDB -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!

Re: [wsjt-devel] Test messages

2017-04-28 Thread Black Michael
One other thought... I could make all the testers generate a return code so the testing routines could be incorporated directly into the Makefiles. Any opinion on which would be more desirable? de Mike W9MDB-- Check out

Re: [wsjt-devel] Test messages

2017-04-28 Thread Black Michael
com> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 2:24 PM Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Test messages On 27/04/2017 20:15, Black Michael wrote: So sounds like JT4 need the same added messages as JT65/JT9 Hi Mike, no I don't think so. JT4 uses single tones for the "

Re: [wsjt-devel] Test messages

2017-04-27 Thread Bill Somerville
On 27/04/2017 23:30, Rex Moncur wrote: Not sure if it is relevant to what Michael is doing but JT4f and QRA64 use messages of the form Call+Call+signal report rather than OOO and RO style signal reports. HI Rex, Mike is trying to unify the code programs which have a -t option to test a

Re: [wsjt-devel] Test messages

2017-04-27 Thread Rex Moncur
@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Test messages On 27/04/2017 20:15, Black Michael wrote: So sounds like JT4 need the same added messages as JT65/JT9 Hi Mike, no I don't think so. JT4 uses single tones for the "short codes", they are not generated by the message encodin

Re: [wsjt-devel] Test messages

2017-04-27 Thread Bill Somerville
On 27/04/2017 20:15, Black Michael wrote: So sounds like JT4 need the same added messages as JT65/JT9 Hi Mike, no I don't think so. JT4 uses single tones for the "short codes", they are not generated by the message encoding routines but synthesized directly by the Modulator class. Otherwise

Re: [wsjt-devel] Test messages

2017-04-27 Thread Black Michael
and QRA64 are good as-is.Have I got that right?  de Mike W9MDB From: Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 11:52 AM Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Test messages On 27/04/2017 17:14, Black Michael wrote: I'd

Re: [wsjt-devel] Test messages

2017-04-27 Thread Bill Somerville
On 27/04/2017 17:14, Black Michael wrote: I'd like to make all the "code" testers do what they are capable of or expected to do and agree where possible. Hi Mike, I'm not quite sure what you are asking here? All the protocols in WSJT-X except ISCAT use a similar, but not exactly the same,

[wsjt-devel] Test messages

2017-04-27 Thread Black Michael
I'd like to make all the "code" testers do what they are capable of or expected to do and agree where possible. There's a difference between some in the additional messages they test.   #1 Should the JT65/JT9 messages be tested elsewhere?#2 Should the MSK144 messages be tested elsewhere?

[wsjt-devel] Test Email - Please Disregard

2016-05-29 Thread Jim Bennett
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px #715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white !important; } Sorry for the bandwidth; having problems with my emails to this group going lost... Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad

[wsjt-devel] Test wav files

2016-01-15 Thread Michael Black
Do we have a link where some of the test files used previously might be available along with test scripts? Back when testing was being done during the improvements there were several hundred files being used but I can't find any reference/link for them. RRR Mike W9MDB

Re: [wsjt-devel] Test wav files

2016-01-15 Thread Bill Somerville
On 15/01/2016 21:45, Michael Black wrote: > Do we have a link where some of the test files used previously might be > available along with test scripts? Hi Mike, developers tend to accumulate their own test files. If you say which mode and band you are interested in maybe someone can make theirs

Re: [wsjt-devel] Test wav files

2016-01-15 Thread Joe Taylor
Mike -- Whatever tests you might choose to do would have more value if they were your own -- i.e., independent of tests already done by others. If you want representative JT9 and JT65 data, set up in dual mode on 14.076, on a weekend in daytime, check "Save all", and let it run for all day.

[wsjt-devel] Test

2016-01-02 Thread Michael Black
I've sent two emails to the list. First one didn't show up at all on the digest. Second one had the attachment but no body in the email. Is is just me? RRR Mike W9MDB -- ___

Re: [wsjt-devel] test feedback

2015-06-09 Thread Bill Somerville
On 09/06/2015 03:36, David Birnbaum wrote: Hi Dave, thanks for the info. Some further comments below. On 08/06/2015 21:24, David Birnbaum wrote: Hi Dave, Built r5548 and tested with both WSPR and JT modes. works fine with JT65 and JT9. WSPR receives/decodes okay but wont transmit. Were

[wsjt-devel] test feedback

2015-06-08 Thread David Birnbaum
Built r5548 and tested with both WSPR and JT modes. works fine with JT65 and JT9. WSPR receives/decodes okay but wont transmit. I ran WSPR for 12 hours and after about 6 hours in it stopped reporting to WSPRNET. Operator error(s)? dave k2lyv

Re: [wsjt-devel] test feedback

2015-06-08 Thread Bill Somerville
On 08/06/2015 21:24, David Birnbaum wrote: Hi Dave, Built r5548 and tested with both WSPR and JT modes. works fine with JT65 and JT9. WSPR receives/decodes okay but wont transmit. Were you using a single band or band hopping? What Pct Tx were you using? I assume you remembered to click

Re: [wsjt-devel] test feedback

2015-06-08 Thread David Birnbaum
On 08/06/2015 21:24, David Birnbaum wrote: Hi Dave, Built r5548 and tested with both WSPR and JT modes. works fine with JT65 and JT9. WSPR receives/decodes okay but wont transmit. Were you using a single band or band hopping? What Pct Tx were you using I used band hopping. Basically 40, 30,