On 14/10/2021 20:22, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hi Barry,
there have been two of your attempted posts rejected because they were
not posted from an email address that is registered on the SourceForge
list server. All the rest of you posts to this thread have arrived at
the list
On 14/10/2021 20:17, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote:
On 14/10/2021 20:02, Neil Zampella via wsjt-devel wrote:
Where are you sending your 'bug report' ... here, or the Groups.io
list? Two different locations.
Good question.
I was not aware of a groups.io list or would have used it as I
On 14/10/2021 20:02, Neil Zampella via wsjt-devel wrote:
Where are you sending your 'bug report' ... here, or the Groups.io
list? Two different locations.
Good question.
I was not aware of a groups.io list or would have used it as I have many
accounts on there.
I have only used this
On 14/10/2021 19:55, Neil Zampella via wsjt-devel wrote:
Are you getting the digest version?
That said, I saw this at 1:54 PM Central time on the 14th
Also, your name & callsign is helpful
Neil, KN3ILZ
Thanks Neil,
I will try sending the original bug report again (if I can find it).
The
Where are you sending your 'bug report' ... here, or the Groups.io
list? Two different locations.
Neil, KN3ILZ
On 10/14/2021 1:44 PM, Barry Jackson wrote:
On 14/10/2021 19:33, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote:
Does this list really take hours to update? sent at:
Thursday, 14 October 2021
On 14/10/2021 19:42, Carey Fisher via wsjt-devel wrote:
I read it at 17:42 but it was 5 minutes old then.
Yes it's not the list that is slow it is the bouncing process that is
taking the time.
I don't understand why my other messages are bounced.
I will try again - 4th time including one from
Are you getting the digest version?
That said, I saw this at 1:54 PM Central time on the 14th
Also, your name & callsign is helpful
Neil, KN3ILZ
On 10/14/2021 1:33 PM, Barry Jackson wrote:
Does this list really take hours to update? sent at:
Thursday, 14 October 2021 19:32
On 14/10/2021 19:33, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote:
Does this list really take hours to update? sent at:
Thursday, 14 October 2021 19:32
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
I read it at 17:42 but it was 5 minutes old then.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 2:36 PM Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Does this list really take hours to update? sent at:
> Thursday, 14 October 2021 19:32
>
>
> ___
Does this list really take hours to update? sent at:
Thursday, 14 October 2021 19:32
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
I had problems with my email
*w...@arrl.net *
it's link to* wb6...@aol.com *
my old license.
So when I post here, I say *I'm not a member.*
I created a new email in Gmail, but Gmail do not allow 4 letter in the
name, it has to have at least six
so I could not create
*w...@gmail.com *
and
I have created a COPR[1] to perform test builds for upcoming wsjtx 2.3.0.
Currently I'm planning on supporting 64bit only (ARM and x86) but can
enable any arch COPR supports by request.
Thanks,
Richard
KF5OIM
[1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/WSJT/
Testing systems yet again; upstream proxy and caching issues under diagnosis.
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
5/9 04
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, 9:52 PM Stephen VK3SIR wrote:
> T E S T of a new system
>
>
> ___
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
T E S T of a new system
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
test, please ignore
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
47 QSOs in the last 90 minutes - Mac OS version worked fine - Sometimes had
trouble keeping up with logging but managed to log all completed QSOs - Had one
or two instances where i had worked and logged a station but their color did
not turn green - Other than that it was a successful test. 73
Hi Bobby,
That does work nicely if you prepare for an upcoming DXpedition.
But when you come across a DXpedition in progress you want to switch
quickly without loosing any information. If you then use Configurations,
the software restarts which not only takes time but you also revert to some
PA0TBR
I just set a config for Fox/Hound and only put the frequencies for
DXpedition mode in it. Just switch to the config and all OK.
Bobby/N4AU
bob...@bellsouth.net
n...@arrl.net
--
Check out the vibrant tech
Many thanks for the tests today. I run in the test with v1.9.0-rc4 r8642
With the weak signals today I did notice a problem.
During the QSO with K1JT, I was still repeating Tx3 when Joe informed me by
pingjockey that I was in the log.
Normally I would restart from Tx1 when I time out and have
First hour signal was +3 and I got -24
I started with 20 watts and ended to 200 watts,
when I got that -24dB report.
Second hour hear best -8dB and started again from 20 watts
went up to 1K and didn't get w7/kh7z :(. Tried several
places, no lucky.
At the end of test last decoded signal was -15dB.
All received in St Helena Island Nobu.
Vy 73 de John ZD7JC
St Helena Island
-Original Message-
From: ja2bqx [mailto:ja2...@proof.ocn.ne.jp]
Sent: 04 April 2018 05:39
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [wsjt-devel] test
Hi all,
Now test , sorry.
http://www.geocities.jp
Hi all,
Now test , sorry.
http://www.geocities.jp/ja2bqx/
de JA2BQX nobu
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
Test: after rejection
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
Mike,
it is working, but for some reason the mail was seriously delayed within
SourceForge, according to the timestamps. You sent it at
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 20:50:41 + (UTC)
and it was processed at SourceForge (1st server)
Sat, 17 Feb 2018 20:50:44 +
and then
Received: from
On 18/02/2018 7:50 AM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
Testing if email group is working yet.
de Mike W9MDB
Took 2 days (based on your posting date/Time) for it to appear in my inbox.
de Laurie VK3AMA
--
Check
Working.
Earle KM4ISN
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 17, 2018, at 3:50 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel
> wrote:
>
> Testing if email group is working yet.
>
> de Mike W9MDB
>
> --
I got the note, Mike.
> On Feb 17, 2018, at 3:50 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel
> wrote:
>
> Testing if email group is working yet.
>
> de Mike W9MDB
>
> --
> Check out the
Testing if email group is working yet.
de Mike W9MDB
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!
One other thought...
I could make all the testers generate a return code so the testing routines
could be incorporated directly into the Makefiles.
Any opinion on which would be more desirable?
de Mike W9MDB--
Check out
com>
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Test messages
On 27/04/2017 20:15, Black Michael wrote:
So sounds like JT4 need the same added messages as JT65/JT9
Hi Mike, no I don't think so. JT4 uses single tones for the "
On 27/04/2017 23:30, Rex Moncur wrote:
Not sure if it is relevant to what Michael is doing but JT4f and QRA64
use messages of the form Call+Call+signal report rather than OOO and
RO style signal reports.
HI Rex,
Mike is trying to unify the code programs which have a -t option to
test a
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Test messages
On 27/04/2017 20:15, Black Michael wrote:
So sounds like JT4 need the same added messages as JT65/JT9
Hi Mike,
no I don't think so. JT4 uses single tones for the "short codes", they are
not generated by the message encodin
On 27/04/2017 20:15, Black Michael wrote:
So sounds like JT4 need the same added messages as JT65/JT9
Hi Mike,
no I don't think so. JT4 uses single tones for the "short codes", they
are not generated by the message encoding routines but synthesized
directly by the Modulator class. Otherwise
and QRA64
are good as-is.Have I got that right? de Mike W9MDB
From: Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com>
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Test messages
On 27/04/2017 17:14, Black Michael wrote:
I'd
On 27/04/2017 17:14, Black Michael wrote:
I'd like to make all the "code" testers do what they are capable of or
expected to do and agree where possible.
Hi Mike,
I'm not quite sure what you are asking here? All the protocols in WSJT-X
except ISCAT use a similar, but not exactly the same,
I'd like to make all the "code" testers do what they are capable of or expected
to do and agree where possible.
There's a difference between some in the additional messages they test.
#1 Should the JT65/JT9 messages be tested elsewhere?#2 Should the MSK144
messages be tested elsewhere?
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white
!important; } Sorry for the bandwidth; having problems with my emails to this
group going lost...
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad
Do we have a link where some of the test files used previously might be
available along with test scripts?
Back when testing was being done during the improvements there were several
hundred files being used but I can't find any reference/link for them.
RRR
Mike W9MDB
On 15/01/2016 21:45, Michael Black wrote:
> Do we have a link where some of the test files used previously might be
> available along with test scripts?
Hi Mike,
developers tend to accumulate their own test files. If you say which
mode and band you are interested in maybe someone can make theirs
Mike --
Whatever tests you might choose to do would have more value if they were
your own -- i.e., independent of tests already done by others.
If you want representative JT9 and JT65 data, set up in dual mode on
14.076, on a weekend in daytime, check "Save all", and let it run for
all day.
I've sent two emails to the list.
First one didn't show up at all on the digest.
Second one had the attachment but no body in the email.
Is is just me?
RRR
Mike W9MDB
--
___
On 09/06/2015 03:36, David Birnbaum wrote:
Hi Dave,
thanks for the info. Some further comments below.
On 08/06/2015 21:24, David Birnbaum wrote:
Hi Dave,
Built r5548 and tested with both WSPR and JT modes. works fine with
JT65 and JT9. WSPR receives/decodes okay but wont transmit.
Were
Built r5548 and tested with both WSPR and JT modes. works fine with JT65
and JT9. WSPR receives/decodes okay but wont transmit.
I ran WSPR for 12 hours and after about 6 hours in it stopped reporting to
WSPRNET.
Operator error(s)?
dave k2lyv
On 08/06/2015 21:24, David Birnbaum wrote:
Hi Dave,
Built r5548 and tested with both WSPR and JT modes. works fine with
JT65 and JT9. WSPR receives/decodes okay but wont transmit.
Were you using a single band or band hopping? What Pct Tx were you using?
I assume you remembered to click
On 08/06/2015 21:24, David Birnbaum wrote:
Hi Dave,
Built r5548 and tested with both WSPR and JT modes. works fine with
JT65 and JT9. WSPR receives/decodes okay but wont transmit.
Were you using a single band or band hopping? What Pct Tx were you using
I used band hopping. Basically 40, 30,
46 matches
Mail list logo