On 6/7/06, Bret Pettichord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am planning to add multiple attribute support to Watir. +1
In effect,
set of attributes would have an :index of 1 unless something else werespecified.Are you going to make :index 0 based? I remember there was a discussion about it.
I have an issue which I suspect can only be solved elegantly by getting
our dev team to make some changes to our application. I suspect that
the issue I'm having would be a general one with *any* tool attempting
to automate a browser (hence my crossposting).
The issue is that there is
Hi,
I have a javascript array in a table.
source
TD class=tnt-table-actionA class=tnt-table-action
href=javascript:PC_7_0_G1_selectEmployee('0', 'amend')Amend/A/TD
TD class=tnt-table-actionA class=tnt-table-action
href=javascript:PC_7_0_G1_selectEmployee('1', 'amend')Amend/A/TD
TD
This will show you links at your page:ie.show_linksindex name id hreftext/src1 _javascript_:PC_7_0_G1_selectEmployee('0',%20'amend') Amend
2 _javascript_:PC_7_0_G1_selectEmployee('1',%20'amend') Amend3 _javascript_:PC_7_0_G1_selectEmployee('2',%20'amend') AmendThis will click
That would actually flash the second link. :)This will click the second link:ie.link(:url, _javascript_:PC_7_0_G1_selectEmployee('1',%20'amend')).clickOn 6/7/06,
Zeljko Filipin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ie.link(:url, _javascript_:PC_7_0_G1_selectEmployee('1',%20'amend')).flash
I can click the fist link quite happily with this:
$ie.link(:text, 'Amend').click
Thanks
Aidy
---
This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or
otherwise
I agree with Bret Paul ... and thanks, Bret, for adding this
functionality!
Darrel Boyt
Systems Analyst
Anteon Corporation
Montgomery, Alabama
- Original Message -
From: Paul Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wtr-general@rubyforge.org
Sent: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 22:13:39 -0600
Subject:
Hello Bret, ie.down_load_time is a Watir
1.5 feature, right?
Im afraid I still have to use the
1.4.1 release (because of WET compatibility for example). Is there a way I
could manage this with 1.4.1?
My code is like this:
[code]
$browser.links.each do |link|
This is not an unusually complex problem. Testing real web applications,
you are likely to run into many similar (and more difficult) issues.
Is your wait hack a simple wait (i.e. a specified number of seconds)
or does it have some logic to it?
Below is a simple example of a wait that will wait
On 6/7/06, Zeljko Filipin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you going to make :index 0 based? I remember there was a discussion about it.
I think it would be nice to offer the option of 0 or 1 based indexing. The 1 based indexing is particularly awkward when working with tables. But i have no
Disclaimer: I am not familiar with the background
discussions so please let me know if I'm completely missing the point.
but...
it would make sense to me to aim to have everything default
to 0-based indexing. Ruby has 0-based indexing (for arrays at least).
I forget enough things
Hi,
Is there anything about that sits on top of Test::Unit to produce - for
example - html reports, or would it be better to log to XML, then XSLT it?
Thank You
Aidy
---
This message
Chris and I were just talking about this yesterday: http://rubyforge.org/projects/test-report/Reports in html or xml. -Charley
On 6/7/06, Adrian Rutter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,Is there anything about that sits on top of Test::Unit to produce - forexample - html reports, or would it be better
Indeed there is. Reporter
http://rubyforge.org/projects/test-report/
Gives you junit-like output.
I think you need to require 'stringio' for it to work, but aside from
that it's pretty straightforwad.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
I think you need to require 'stringio' for it to work, but aside from
that it's pretty straightforwad.
Alex fixed this in 'trunk'.
-Chris
___
Wtr-general mailing list
Wtr-general@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
There is always the index option (to click the 3rd Amend) too:
ie.link(:index, 3).click
Cheers,
Daniel.
On 07/06/06, Adrian Rutter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can click the fist link quite happily with this:
$ie.link(:text, 'Amend').click
Thanks
Aidy
If you knew of some text that was always present in the html of a
loaded page, but not present when one of the error pages is displayed
you could use:
ie.html.match(/some_text_that_is_always_present/)
I imagine there is a better way to do it though.
Cheers,
Daniel.
On 07/06/06, Rodrigo
You can disbelieve all you like Bret, but this is the behavior we
observed. I believe my own eyes over your protestations. There could be
some semantic confusion here over scope, what is meant by a "session" .
. . what is meant by a "code run" . . . which is partly what this
thread was about.
I do not understand the problem. Why not just alter the _javascript_ to
reduce or eliminate the delay? You can make it do anything you want it
to.
Lonny Eachus
=
Subject:
[Wtr-general] Automation annoyingness
On 6/7/06, Lonny Eachus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We had a server set up using multiple Mongrels with a lighttpd front
end. A server will wait for an http request to come in, and fire off
our Rails application. The program exits when done (i.e., the
controller .rb runs to completion, no
I see
three ways this could happen, there may be more: (1) The variable "global_foo"
is truly "global" on that server from the moment it is instantiated, and remains
in memory even when there is no "running code". This is contrary to the
way I understood globals to function . . . in which
On 6/7/06, Rodrigo Julian Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Bret, ie.down_load_time is a Watir
1.5 feature, right?No. It's been in Watir for a long time. It is in 1.4.1.
Well, I need a way of check that each link
that was clicked have loaded "completely" a page, else I need to
I can see that we were coming from different perspectives. But please
keep in mind that not only the functionality but also the "scope"
(pardon the word) of Watir may be expanding . . . I know of several
people at least who use it for things other than testing. Our
application DOES use Watir,
Hey Lonny, Globals in general are best avoided, there are cases where it makes sense, but having been assigned single 40+ page perl scripts and various other projects where just about every variable is a global will pretty much drive that one home. Best to use instance variables when possible,
Please do not take this comment the wrong way, but this is the second
time someone has mentioned -- to me -- that this might be an
"inappropriate" topic for this forum.
Please read the subject line again. Someone asked about "session
states" being "shared" . . . in the context of Watir. I
On 6/7/06, Lillis, Dara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
while not ($ie.link(:text,Second).exists?)sleep 0.5end$ie.link(:text,Second).clickThis is what i do as well.I
think the remaining question is whether Watir should do this
automatically. I've actually coded this directly and tested it and it
works.
I'm voting to add this...I know I can add it myself, but it seems like
a number of people are having to do this already.
Jared
I
think the remaining question is whether Watir should do this
automatically. I've actually coded this directly and tested it and it
works. It's only a couple
For what it's worth, I think that is a great idea.
Lonny Eachus
==
Subject:
Re: [Wtr-general] Proposal for supporting multiple attributes
From:
"Bret Pettichord" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By automatically, I would hope you mean a kind of "wait_for()" method,
rather than doing it unseen in the background. At first thought it
seems the latter would be terribly inefficient, especially since it is
only necessary in relatively rare cases.
Time and efficiency are definitely a
Apologies for the post with the wrong subject line . . .
By automatically, I would hope you mean a kind of "wait_for()" method,
rather than doing it unseen in the background. At first thought it
seems the latter would be terribly inefficient, especially since it is
only necessary in
I thought you meant there was an explicit delay. While I do not doubt
what you say, it seems strange that even a mess of _javascript_ should
take very long. On the other hand, in recent months I have seen some
_javascript_ that was, indeed, a real mess. Can you be more specific
about what it
On 6/7/06, Lonny Eachus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By automatically, I would hope you mean a kind of wait_for() method,
rather than doing it unseen in the background. At first thought it
seems the latter would be terribly inefficient, especially since it is
only necessary in relatively rare
Working out what is happening when your script is failing in this
instance was time-consuming and non-obvious. I assume that Watir's
audience includes people who may not figure out what is going on when
their script appears to randomly fail. It makes sense to me to prevent
this problem if it
When you reply to a digest message like this:Re: [Wtr-general] Wtr-general Digest, Vol 31, Issue 16Please change the header, preferably to match that of the post you are replying to.
Including subject lines like this make threads nearly impossible to track.Bret
34 matches
Mail list logo
