For a long time i have talked about how important it is for Watir to make
code like these examples work:
@ie_new = Watir::IE.new
text_field = @ie_new.text_field(:name, 'text1')
@ie_new.goto($htmlRoot + "textfields1.html")
assert_equal('Hello World', text_field.val
Bret Pettichord wrote:
I just installed Ruby 182-15 and then Watir 1.4 and did
not have any problems. All the unit tests (but the three frame tests --
a known issue) ran without problem. I did not need to add require
'rubygems'. I'm pretty sure that Fox was a gem in 182-14 as well.
The se
Bret Pettichord wrote:
I just installed Ruby 182-15 and then Watir 1.4 and did
not have any problems. All the unit tests (but the three frame tests --
a known issue) ran without problem. I did not need to add require
'rubygems'. I'm pretty sure that Fox was a gem in 182-14 as well.
The se
At 05:07 PM 8/18/2005, Warren Pollans wrote:
That works - but why doesn't the other work?
The object reference you stored becomes stale when a page loads or reloads.
The same thing will happen to the value= method.
I've temporarily bypassed this particular problem by using the value=
method
Thanks for the reminder. I had searched my mail archive for your posts, but
i didn't think to search for all possible spellings of your name Mr.
Ver(k)hovsky.
At 10:33 PM 8/18/2005, Alex Verhovsky wrote:
Bret Pettichord wrote:
7. make a gem
how could i forget -- kingsley is helping me with
I just installed Ruby 182-15 and then Watir 1.4 and did not have any
problems. All the unit tests (but the three frame tests -- a known issue)
ran without problem. I did not need to add require 'rubygems'. I'm pretty
sure that Fox was a gem in 182-14 as well.
The second problem cited below, re
Jonathan Kohl wrote:
I
am getting some emails reporting a couple of issues. The first is from
folks trying to install Watir with Ruby 182-15. They get an error
message about the installer not being able to find Fox. Looks like Fox
is now installed as a Gem, so one must also require rub
Bret Pettichord wrote:
7. make a gem
how could i forget -- kingsley is helping me with this.
To remind, I once submitted a gemspec for Watir. It was before there
were any native libraries in the distibution though. Anyway, Bret, if
you need help with a gem, just whistle :)
Alexey Verkhovs
Below is my code
require 'watir'include Watir
require 'methods/login'
$au3 = WIN32OLE.new("AutoItX3.Control") $au3.Opt("MouseCoordMode",0)
admin_login("admin","123456")
$ie.link(:text,"License generation").click
sleep(1)puts "ie.document.frames.length is " puts $ie.document.frames.length
I am getting some
emails reporting a couple of issues. The first is from folks trying to
install Watir with Ruby 182-15. They get an error message about the installer
not being able to find Fox. Looks like Fox is now installed as a Gem, so one
must also require rubygems in the installer. We
That works - but why doesn't the other work?
I've temporarily bypassed this particular problem by using the value=
method - just so I can get on with writing the test
On or about Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:13:38 -0500
Bret Pettichord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> allegedly wrote:
> At 03:23 PM 8/18/2005, Warren
At 03:23 PM 8/18/2005, Warren Pollans wrote:
How can I figure out (debug) what this complaint is about:
WIN32OLERuntimeError: focus
OLE error code:8000 in htmlfile
Unexpected call to method or property access.
HRESULT error code:0x80020009
Exception occurred.
c:/ruby/
How can I figure out (debug) what this complaint is about:
WIN32OLERuntimeError: focus
OLE error code:8000 in htmlfile
Unexpected call to method or property access.
HRESULT error code:0x80020009
Exception occurred.
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/watir.rb:3399:in `method
Bugs item #2263, was opened at 2005-08-18 13:30
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=487&aid=2263&group_id=104
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Bret Pettichord (bret)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Tabl
Bugs item #2262, was opened at 2005-08-18 13:28
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=487&aid=2262&group_id=104
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Bret Pettichord (bret)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: show
Bugs item #2261, was opened at 2005-08-18 13:27
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=487&aid=2261&group_id=104
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Bret Pettichord (bret)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Form
Nice. Very helpful. I'll forward these thoughts to the team.
Thanks,
-=michael=-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Kohl
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 9:55 AM
To: wtr-general@rubyforge.org
Subject: RE: [Wtr-general] A general qu
> I guess I've assumed that code thoroughly tested by
> developers would reduce the time QA spends documenting
> issues, but that the QA engineer would still have an
> obligation to manually exercise all the simple test cases.
> Is this not true?
Well tested and testable code reduces the lengt
I guess I've assumed that code thoroughly tested by developers would
reduce the time QA spends documenting issues, but that the QA engineer
would still have an obligation to manually exercise all the simple test
cases. Is this not true?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[
Title: Message
Hi Michael
I am the sole QA grunt for our company,
and there are several ways that Watir has helped alleviate my testing burden:
1 – I use Watir scripts to update
our baseline data to try and mimic the client’s use of our application so
our testing data is up to date.
2
Michael
In our project, developers use watir for validating a build --
basically regression testing to demonstrate that the build is viable
and worthy of deploying in the test environment. Testers use a
disfferent tool. Their job is made simpler because they don't wate
time on a build that has one
Title: Message
>At what
point do these scripts allieviate some of the QA engineer's manual testing
burden?
Until machines are intelligent, they can't
really do testing at all. Testing to me is assessing risks, asking questions
about software, using a guide to show me whether something is wro
With little developer testing, testers often have to run lots of simple
tests to uncover simple bugs.
Getting the developers more involved in testing should allow the testers to
move to more complex tests more quickly.
At 11:21 AM 8/18/2005, Michael Kelly wrote:
Content-class: urn:content-cl
$ie.ie.visible = false
At 11:12 AM 8/18/2005, Peter Chau wrote:
This code works for minimize and background IE browsers... Is there a
way to turn background on/off in the middle of a script??
require 'watir'
include Watir
class IE
def exists?
begin
@ie.hWnd== -1
Title: Message
My developer chums
and I use Watir as part of our test-driven development. As such, we're
giddy to be able to finally write unit tests for the UI. But
the presence of these developer written UI test scripts raises
questions about what impact, if any, they will have on what o
This code works for minimize and background IE browsers... Is there a
way to turn background on/off in the middle of a script??
require 'watir'
include Watir
class IE
def exists?
begin
@ie.hWnd== -1
return true
rescue
return
Support Requests item #2259, was opened at 2005-08-18 13:02
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=488&aid=2259&group_id=104
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Richard Green (basebal446)
Assigned to: Nobody (None
27 matches
Mail list logo
