x12'
> > > I think the installer was written for 'fox'
> > >
> > > I cnat be certain as I dont have any code available right now. We would
> > > need to fix this for the next release though
> > >
> > > Paul
> > >
> >
ough
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: Jeff Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2005 12:38 pm
> > Subject: Re: RE: [Wtr-general] I have a couple of questions...
> >
> > > Ok, I just ran the
would need
> to fix this for the next release though
>
> Paul
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Jeff Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2005 12:38 pm
> Subject: Re: RE: [Wtr-general] I have a couple of questions...
>
> > Ok, I
ECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2005 12:38 pm
Subject: Re: RE: [Wtr-general] I have a couple of questions...
> Ok, I just ran the installer ( versions .15 & .14 ) and after I've
> gotten Ruby installed, when I run the watir installer ( install.rb )
> it says it can'
, you would apply an iterator to that
> > >frame. Seems like this way would save me work;-) But probably be less
> > >intuiitive.
> > >
> > >- Original Message -
> > >From: Bret Pettichord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Date: Wednesday, A
5, Paul Rogers wrote:
> > > >ah, good point. Should it perhaps only iterate the top level frames?
> > > >
> > > >and if you wanted lower level frames, you would apply an iterator to that
> > > >frame. Seems like this way would save me work;-) But prob
that
> >frame. Seems like this way would save me work;-) But probably be less
> >intuiitive.
> >
> >- Original Message -----
> >From: Bret Pettichord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2005 2:35 am
> >Subject: RE: [Wtr-ge
ssage -----
> >From: Bret Pettichord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2005 2:35 am
> >Subject: RE: [Wtr-general] I have a couple of questions...
> >
> > > At 10:33 PM 8/2/2005, Paul Rogers wrote:
> > > >I want to add a frame ite
that
frame. Seems like this way would save me work;-) But probably be less
intuiitive.
- Original Message -
From: Bret Pettichord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2005 2:35 am
Subject: RE: [Wtr-general] I have a couple of questions...
> At 10:33 PM 8/2/2005, Paul Roge
Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2005 2:35 am
> Subject: RE: [Wtr-general] I have a couple of questions...
>
> > At 10:33 PM 8/2/2005, Paul Rogers wrote:
> > >I want to add a frame iterator object as soon as I get the chance:
> > >
> > >Ie.frames.each {|f| }
>
TED]>
Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2005 2:35 am
Subject: RE: [Wtr-general] I have a couple of questions...
> At 10:33 PM 8/2/2005, Paul Rogers wrote:
> >I want to add a frame iterator object as soon as I get the chance:
> >
> >Ie.frames.each {|f| }
> >
> >Whe
At 10:19 PM 8/2/2005, Jeff Wood wrote:
But, it really would be beneficial to be able to say, I don't know
which frame this is in ... ( I've got situations where the dev team I
support is moving things around a LOT ) ... so, If I can just say, I
know it's called "BLAH" then find it whereever, but
At 10:05 PM 8/2/2005, Paul Rogers wrote:
Im not
sure, as there is nothing preventing you from having the same name or id
on html tags in the page.
It's non-conformant HTML if it has duplicate id's on a page (duplicate
names are kosher).
_
Bret Pettichord
www.pettichord
At 10:33 PM 8/2/2005, Paul Rogers wrote:
I want to add a frame iterator object as soon as I get the chance:
Ie.frames.each {|f| }
When that's, there, it would be simple for you to add your 'click a link
in any frame' method. It wont be this release though.
Paul
This will be harder tha
t; >
> > Paul
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Wood
> > Sent: 02 August 2005 21:19
> > To: wtr-general@rubyforge.org
> > Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] I have a couple o
AIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Most of those are already there ;-)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Wood
> Sent: 02 August 2005 21:43
> To: wtr-general@rubyforge.org
> Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] I have a couple of q
Most of those are already there ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Wood
Sent: 02 August 2005 21:43
To: wtr-general@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] I have a couple of questions...
That would be cool.
Iterators on ALL of
I'm not saying it's bad to be able to specify a frame ( I want x in y
) ... I'm saying, if you have more of a moving target, the ability to
say I want x in whatever frame I can find it in ...
I wouldn't want things that way, but I know of some dev teams that
just can't leave anything alone, so yo
; Sent: 02 August 2005 21:19
> To: wtr-general@rubyforge.org
> Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] I have a couple of questions...
>
>
> I don't mind the return the first one ...
>
> But, it really would be beneficial to be able to say, I don't know which
> frame this is in .
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Wood
Sent: 02 August 2005 21:19
To: wtr-general@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] I have a couple of questions...
I don't mind the return the first one ...
But, it really would be beneficial to be able to say, I don't know which
frame
> But, it really would be beneficial to be able to say, I don't know
> which frame this is in ... ( I've got situations where the dev team I
> support is moving things around a LOT ) ... so, If I can just say, I
> know it's called "BLAH" then find it whereever, but I'm sure I can
> code that up mys
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Wood
> Sent: 02 August 2005 20:58
> To: wtr-general@rubyforge.org
> Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] I have a couple of questions...
>
>
> Wow, thanks for the quick response .
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Wood
Sent: 02 August 2005 20:58
To: wtr-general@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] I have a couple of questions...
Wow, thanks for the quick response ...
So, with the .link or .frame or .blah
Wow, thanks for the quick response ...
So, with the .link or .frame or .blah calls, what do they return if it
can't find the item ? or if it finds multiple?
j.
On 8/2/05, Paul Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. no - you must specify the frame, like
> ie.frame(:index,2).link(:id,'blah').clic
1. no - you must specify the frame, like
ie.frame(:index,2).link(:id,'blah').click
2. yes, but you have to use the Autoit tool to help you, its not too
hard though.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Wood
Sent: 02 August 2005 20:37
25 matches
Mail list logo
