Eric Y. Kow wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 21:22:54 +0100, Mads Lindstrøm wrote:
> > It would be fair, except that the time-package did not compile easily on
> > Debian either :( I will try to look more into the issue this weekend.
> > Maybe I could get the time-package maintainers to fix the iss
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 21:22:54 +0100, Mads Lindstrøm wrote:
> It would be fair, except that the time-package did not compile easily on
> Debian either :( I will try to look more into the issue this weekend.
> Maybe I could get the time-package maintainers to fix the issue.
Hmm, is it perhaps jus
Hi,
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 05:22:54 +0900, Mads Lindstrøm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Would it be fair to ask people to install the time package?
>> http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/time-1.1.2.0
>>
>
> It would be fair, except that the time-package did not compile easily o
Hi,
Eric Kow wrote:
> > The problem is that the module imports Data.Time, which do not exist in
> > GHC 6.3.3. If I uncommit the patch everything compiles. And the examples
> > in samples/wx runs - the two I tried anyway.
>
> Would it be fair to ask people to install the time package?
> http:/
> The problem is that the module imports Data.Time, which do not exist in
> GHC 6.3.3. If I uncommit the patch everything compiles. And the examples
> in samples/wx runs - the two I tried anyway.
Would it be fair to ask people to install the time package?
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hack
Hi all
I've been trying to compile WxHaskell with GHC 6.6.3, as this is the
stable version in Debian. I know I should have done this regularly, but
I have unfortunately been getting into the bad habit of only compiling
with GHC 6.8.1 and GHC 6.8.2.
First of all, I assume that if people want to co
