Rob Kendrick wrote:
>> Anyway, 10.3.9 is doable. Earlier versions would be more pain.
>
> 10.3.9 is what I'm running here - I'm led to believe it's the latest
> that'll sensibly run on the hardware.
Panther is/was a great release, so you are probably right there.
(my main reason for upgrading to
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 20:56 +0100, Anders F Björklund wrote:
> Anyway, 10.3.9 is doable. Earlier versions would be more pain.
10.3.9 is what I'm running here - I'm led to believe it's the latest
that'll sensibly run on the hardware. What's involved in getting WxLua
running on it? Having spent
Rob Kendrick wrote:
>> It is of course possible to build a version of wxLua that would work
>> on Panther too, but there hasn't been any demand for it since it's
>> EOL.
>
> Gah - why does Mac stuff so frequently only run on (very) recent
> versions? The only Mac hardware I have to had is an anc
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 20:40 +0100, Anders F Björklund wrote:
> It is of course possible to build a version of wxLua that would work
> on Panther too, but there hasn't been any demand for it since it's EOL.
Gah - why does Mac stuff so frequently only run on (very) recent
versions? The only Mac h
Rob Kendrick wrote:
> Guessing from the file name of the download (which includes -tiger), am
> I correct in assuming that the WxLua pre-built download on the website
> is incompatible with Mac OS X 10.3.9?
It was built using the 10.4u SDK, so it requires 10.4 "Tiger" or later
(easier that way, s
