there.
> > It's like anything else, there's a learning curve. Kurt KC9LDH :-)
> >
>
>
> > From: Lee Bengston
> > To: Xastir - APRS client software discussion
> > Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 9:29 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Xastir] GeoPDF try
> &g
curve. Kurt KC9LDH :-)
>
> From: Lee Bengston
> To: Xastir - APRS client software discussion
> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 9:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [Xastir] GeoPDF try
>
> LOL - I already said I would do that. I'm not exactly sure how long it
> will take. In
: Xastir - APRS client software discussion
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Xastir] GeoPDF try
LOL - I already said I would do that. I'm not exactly sure how long it
will take. In the meantime, anyone interested in these maps can download
them via the link below. Mi
LOL - I already said I would do that. I'm not exactly sure how long it
will take. In the meantime, anyone interested in these maps can download
them via the link below. Might as well find and download the maps you
intend to convert for use with Xastir.
http://nationalmap.gov/ustopo/index.html
To: Xastir - APRS client software discussion
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Xastir] GeoPDF try
OK, got the conversions working. Some screen shots are available via the
links below:
Screen shot 1 - the geotiff file for Leesburg, VA as displayed in the
ristretto
That looks REALLY nice Lee! For a Christmas present.. could you write
up a doc of the steps to get that fully working? Though the online OSM
work, they are pretty dark and blurry for my tastes. These would be a
major upgrade!
--David
KI6ZHD
On 12/13/2015 08:38 PM, Lee Bengston wrote:
OK,
OK, got the conversions working. Some screen shots are available via the
links below:
Screen shot 1 - the geotiff file for Leesburg, VA as displayed in the
ristretto image viewer in Xubuntu 15.04.
www.175moonlight.com/xastir/pics/GeoTIFF-ristretto-screenshot.png
Screen shot 2 - the same geotiff
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Lee Bengston
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Tom Russo wrote:
>
>>
>>
>
>> Without the imagery, you don't need the high DPI that will be used by
>> default,
>> and so the thing processes much, much quicker (less than a minute, vs.
>> more
>> than
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Tom Russo wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 09:32:17PM -0700, we recorded a bogon-computron
> collision of the flavor, containing:
> > You can experiment with compression to see if it works for you. Look at
> > the bottom of geopdf2gtiff.pl and you'll see two co
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 09:32:17PM -0700, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the flavor, containing:
> You can experiment with compression to see if it works for you. Look at
> the bottom of geopdf2gtiff.pl and you'll see two commented out
> lines:
I just experimented with this and fou
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 08:55:58PM -0500, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the flavor, containing:
>
> $ ./geopdf2gtiff.pl -f VA_Leesburg_20130613_TM_geo.pdf
> User asked us to fudge the neatline, finding nearest 7.5 minute quad
> boundaries
> Warning 1: libXML: 0: Element 'GeometryFie
Thanks for giving it a shot Lee. I'm not educated enough to even know where to
start.Kurt KC9LDH
From: Lee Bengston
To: Xastir - APRS client software discussion
Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2015 7:55 PM
Subject: [Xastir] GeoPDF try
All the talk lately about offline maps pro
All the talk lately about offline maps prompted me to try converting the
latest USGS Topo maps from geoPDF format to geoTiff using the
geopdf2gtiff.pl script. I did this back in 2011 or 2012 after Tom KM5VY
created the script. At that time it was a requirement (at least in the
Ubuntu/Debian world
13 matches
Mail list logo
