User: d_jencks
Date: 02/09/20 23:17:31
Modified:modules/jboss/src/xdoclet/modules/jboss/jmx/resources
jboss-service-template.xdt
jbossmx-xml-descriptor.xdt jbossmx-xml-doc.xdt
Log:
changed managed-argument to managed-parameter and used
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/09/20 23:17:32
Modified:samples/src/java/test/jmx JBossXMLExample.java
Log:
changed managed-argument to managed-parameter and used it in all templates using
info about managed constructor and managed operation parameters
Revision ChangesPath
1.7
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/09/20 23:17:32
Modified:modules/jmx/src/META-INF xtags.xml
Log:
changed managed-argument to managed-parameter and used it in all templates using
info about managed constructor and managed operation parameters
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +13 -6
Hi, I filled the bug report on jira but I'm not
sure if it's really working (since there are
only 2 bugs including mine).
It's minor problem, I made spelling error and got message:
<>
the validvalues are not set?
regards
marcin
---
This sf
Em Qui, 2002-09-19 às 19:35, Andrew Stevens escreveu:
> Come to think of it, though, isn't jndi-name another of the parameters
> that we're going to consolidate, and remove from the vendor specific tags?
> When's that targetted? 1.2, 2.0 or somewhere in between?
Well, I hope to do at least the
Wow, ok... ConfigParamIntrospector. I had no idea we were doing stuff
like that under the hood. Now could someone explain to me where and why
that is used to do bean getter lookups?
I suspect there is a bug in there that is stripping the dots or not
doing the proper name lookup for a simple
Ok, I have more clues. Here's what I'm trying to do:
And in web-security.xml I'm using the config parameter to control which
authentication mode is enabled. BASIC is nice for Cactus tests, but
sucks for production sites, so thats one of the reaso
No one ever replied before. so I'm pinging again. I'm still having
this problem, and I'd like to resolve it. Any pointers on where to
start digging?
It works with the subtask, but not for or its
nested subtask. Maybe I'm hallucinating.
Thanks for any and all assistance.
Eri
Patches item #612096, was opened at 2002-09-20 09:39
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402706&aid=612096&group_id=31602
Category: ejbdoclet
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned t
A wise old hermit known only as =?iso-8859-1?Q?Aslak_Helles=F8y?=
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said:
> I think this is a good idea, but we need to sort out a few issues:
>
> 1) I suppose you mean moving the whole xdoclet module to jboss.
> 2) If my assumption is right on 1), we must update our buil
User: pazu
Date: 02/09/20 10:28:14
Modified:modules/jboss/src/xdoclet/modules/jboss/ejb/resources
jbosscmp-jdbc_xml.xdt
Log:
reversed fk-constraints. I hope this now this is really
what should be generated.
Revision ChangesPath
1.27 +6
Feature Requests item #612118, was opened at 2002-09-20 13:50
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402707&aid=612118&group_id=31602
Category: vendor
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Chris Mein (chrismein)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (
Bugs item #605374, was opened at 2002-09-06 12:50
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402704&aid=605374&group_id=31602
Category: ejbdoclet
Group: cvs
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Colin Daly (colin_daly)
Assigned to: Mathi
Patches item #612096, was opened at 2002-09-20 05:39
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402706&aid=612096&group_id=31602
Category: ejbdoclet
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobo
Patches item #582551, was opened at 2002-07-16 23:49
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402706&aid=582551&group_id=31602
Category: ejbdoclet
Group: None
>Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: The Real John Barbee (eebrab)
Assigned to:
Patches item #582551, was opened at 2002-07-17 00:49
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402706&aid=582551&group_id=31602
Category: ejbdoclet
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: The Real John Barbee (eebrab)
Assigned
A wise old hermit known only as =?iso-8859-1?Q?Aslak_Helles=F8y?=
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said:
> > However, if I use ejb.ejb-ref tags in my file instead of
> > web.ejb-ref tags, I
> > don't see any tags in the generated web.xml file.
> > Another thing I
> > noticed in the web_xml.xdt file is
User: pathoss
Date: 02/09/20 07:27:16
Modified:xdocsnavigation.xml
Log:
Updated bug and patch reporting into "Create an Issue". This could be confusing at
first, so maybe we change this back.
Revision ChangesPath
1.17 +1 -2 xdoclet/xdocs/navigation.xml
User: pathoss
Date: 02/09/20 07:26:28
Modified:.project.xml
Log:
Updated issue tracking url.
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +1 -1 xdoclet/project.xml
Index: project.xml
===
RCS file: /
19 matches
Mail list logo
