On 11/17/2010 03:27 PM, M A Young wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Digimer wrote:
>
>> On 11/17/2010 03:06 PM, M A Young wrote:
>>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Digimer wrote:
>>>
The source RPM depends on 'asciidoc', which isn't in the main Red Hat
repository (at least, not that I could find). I wa
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Digimer wrote:
> On 11/17/2010 03:06 PM, M A Young wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Digimer wrote:
>>
>>> The source RPM depends on 'asciidoc', which isn't in the main Red Hat
>>> repository (at least, not that I could find). I was wondering what,
>>> exactly, needs asciidoc an
On 11/17/2010 03:06 PM, M A Young wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Digimer wrote:
>
>> The source RPM depends on 'asciidoc', which isn't in the main Red Hat
>> repository (at least, not that I could find). I was wondering what,
>> exactly, needs asciidoc and if it would be safe/easy/possible/advisable
On 11/17/2010 03:06 PM, M A Young wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Digimer wrote:
>
>> The source RPM depends on 'asciidoc', which isn't in the main Red Hat
>> repository (at least, not that I could find). I was wondering what,
>> exactly, needs asciidoc and if it would be safe/easy/possible/advisable
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Digimer wrote:
> The source RPM depends on 'asciidoc', which isn't in the main Red Hat
> repository (at least, not that I could find). I was wondering what,
> exactly, needs asciidoc and if it would be safe/easy/possible/advisable
> to remove that dependency.
It seems to be u
I hope this isn't too off-topic. :)
I'm trying to recompile Michael Young's F12 dom0 kernel[1] on RHEL 6.
I've run into a small issue that I could probably push through, but I
wanted to ask for opinions here.
The source RPM depends on 'asciidoc', which isn't in the main Red Hat
repository (at