My apologies for not closing the loop on this one. For the archives...
On 02/10/2011 03:11 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 01:55:57AM -0500, Bill McGonigle wrote:
>> > Hi, folks,
>> >
>> > Has anybody had luck using phy: disks with this version?
>> >
> With*what* version?:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 01:55:57AM -0500, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> Hi, folks,
>
> Has anybody had luck using phy: disks with this version?
>
With *what* version? :)
> I'm trying to create a new OpenSolaris DomU (nexenta 3.0.4) with two phy:
> devices, and
> instead of the expected behavior I'm
Hi, folks,
Has anybody had luck using phy: disks with this version? I'm trying to
create a new OpenSolaris DomU (nexenta 3.0.4) with two phy: devices, and
instead of the expected behavior I'm seeing two disks show up, one as
0GB and one as 64510.04GB.
file: devices seem to work OK.
Disks are
On 12/02/2010 06:03 AM, M A Young wrote:
> I have built what may be my last Fedora 12 kernel
> (2.6.32.26-174.2.xendom0.fc12) as Fedora 12 EOLs today (this is the same
> Fedora patch level as the official 2.6.32.26-175.fc12 kernel which has
> just been released). It is available at
> http://koji.fe
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 12:05:33AM -0600, W. Michael Petullo wrote:
> This kernel works as expected with one exception. The exception has been
> a nagging problem, but I have not reported it because 1) we are using
> a research OS in DomU and 2) we are not clear if the problem is in
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 03:27:42PM -0600, W. Michael Petullo wrote:
> >> This kernel works as expected with one exception. The exception has been
> >> a nagging problem, but I have not reported it because 1) we are using
> >> a research OS in DomU and 2) we are not clear if the problem is in our
>
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:17:41PM +, M A Young wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, W. Michael Petullo wrote:
>
> > Moving forward and for the purposes of Fedora 15 development, can we get
> > both patched 2.7.37/38 kernels that support DomU and raw upstream
> > kernels? Or does xen/next-2.6.27 not h
>> This kernel works as expected with one exception. The exception has been
>> a nagging problem, but I have not reported it because 1) we are using
>> a research OS in DomU and 2) we are not clear if the problem is in our
>> code, Linux or Xen. But, here are the symptoms:
>> Occasionally (this se
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, W. Michael Petullo wrote:
> Moving forward and for the purposes of Fedora 15 development, can we get
> both patched 2.7.37/38 kernels that support DomU and raw upstream
> kernels? Or does xen/next-2.6.27 not have the requisite features yet
> anyway?
xen/next-2.6.37 doesn't cur
> I have built what may be my last Fedora 12 kernel
> (2.6.32.26-174.2.xendom0.fc12) as Fedora 12 EOLs today (this is the same
> Fedora patch level as the official 2.6.32.26-175.fc12 kernel which has
> just been released). It is available at
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=
I have built what may be my last Fedora 12 kernel
(2.6.32.26-174.2.xendom0.fc12) as Fedora 12 EOLs today (this is the same
Fedora patch level as the official 2.6.32.26-175.fc12 kernel which has
just been released). It is available at
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2637740 an
11 matches
Mail list logo
