Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"): > With my xenbits admin hat on I therefore intend to: > > * Create xtf.git in the xenbits toplevel >and give it the appropriate per

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

On 18/07/2016 16:58, "Ian Jackson" <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> wrote: >Lars Kurth writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was >Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"): >> In that case, forget my objection and go ahead

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

Lars Kurth writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"): > In that case, forget my objection and go ahead and create the directories. > I clearly don't understand how the docs toolchain works and wa

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

On 18/07/2016 16:30, "Ian Jackson" <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> wrote: >Lars Kurth writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was >Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"): >> I don't object to a new xtf directory in

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

Lars Kurth writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"): > If there is a link between directory structure and web index, my preferred > alternative to creating the two separate directories would be to gr

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

Lars Kurth writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"): > I don't object to a new xtf directory in the docs root per se. I mainly > object to how the documents are presented in > http://xenbits.xen.org

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

Lars Kurth writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"): > On 15/07/2016 11:21, "Ian Jackson" <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> wrote: > >Lars, you haven't specified the pathname

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

On 18/07/2016 15:36, "Ian Jackson" <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> wrote: >Lars Kurth writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was >Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"): >> On 15/07/2016 11:21, "Ian Jackson"

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

On 15/07/2016 11:21, "Ian Jackson" <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> wrote: >Lars Kurth writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was >Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"): >> Alright, [stuff] > >With my xenbits ad

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

Lars Kurth writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"): > Alright, [stuff] With my xenbits admin hat on I therefore intend to: * Create xtf.git in the xenbits toplevel and give it the appropriate

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: > However, OSSTest has always been known as OSSTest (including all > references in the automated emails), and not as a xen test framework. > Taking any steps to make OSSTest retroactively searchable as a xen test >

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

On 08/07/16 14:42, Lars Kurth wrote: > > On 08/07/2016 14:06, "Andrew Cooper" wrote: > >> On 07/07/16 18:17, Lars Kurth wrote: >>> Alright, >>> >>> it appears we are at an impasse here. Not hosting the code on xenbits as >>> suggested by David, seems to be the worst

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

On 08/07/2016 14:06, "Andrew Cooper" wrote: >On 07/07/16 18:17, Lars Kurth wrote: >> Alright, >> >> it appears we are at an impasse here. Not hosting the code on xenbits as >> suggested by David, seems to be the worst solution and will benefit >> no-one. >> >>... >>

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

On 07/07/16 18:17, Lars Kurth wrote: > Alright, > > it appears we are at an impasse here. Not hosting the code on xenbits as > suggested by David, seems to be the worst solution and will benefit > no-one. > >> If we can't get consensus on something like this, the sensible thing >> to do would be

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

en Source Xen Continuous Integration" That should address everyones concern, as far as I can tell from the the e-mail thread. If anyone disagrees, please shout within the next few days. Best Regards Lars P.S.: I moved fixing some of our governance issues towards the top of my TODO list On

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:26:09PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 07/07/16 12:10, Lars Kurth wrote: > >> On 6 Jul 2016, at 15:22, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Looking at the above, it occurs to me that, this whole area seems to be a > >>> little

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"): > David Vrabel writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was > Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

David Vrabel writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"): > Really? Is it that difficult to accept that the original project author > gets to choose the name? Yes. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

On 07/07/16 14:59, Ian Jackson wrote: > Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was > Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"): >> On 07/07/16 12:10, Lars Kurth wrote: >>> @Andrew: would someth

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

On 07/07/16 14:59, Ian Jackson wrote: > Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was > Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"): >> On 07/07/16 12:10, Lars Kurth wrote: >>> @Andrew: would something

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"): > On 07/07/16 12:10, Lars Kurth wrote: > > @Andrew: would something like test/xtf.git work I would live with that. > It would, although

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

On 07/07/16 12:10, Lars Kurth wrote: >> On 6 Jul 2016, at 15:22, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk >> wrote: >> >>> Looking at the above, it occurs to me that, this whole area seems to be a >>> little inconsistent anyway and could do with a little house-keeping. We >>> have >>> -

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

> On 6 Jul 2016, at 15:22, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >> Looking at the above, it occurs to me that, this whole area seems to be a >> little inconsistent anyway and could do with a little house-keeping. We >> have >> - osstest.git >> - there also is osstest/*.git

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

> Looking at the above, it occurs to me that, this whole area seems to be a > little inconsistent anyway and could do with a little house-keeping. We > have > - osstest.git > - there also is osstest/*.git which seems to be odd and seems to have been > inactive for a while (not very clear to me

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

On 01/07/2016 20:04, "Ian Jackson" <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> wrote: >David Vrabel writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF >(was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"): >> On 20/06/16 18:03, Ian Jackson wrote:

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

David Vrabel writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"): > On 20/06/16 18:03, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Hopefully we can find one that Andrew likes and that's acceptable to > > the committers. &

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

David Vrabel writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"): > It seems unfair to give Andrew's project a clunky (repo) name because > osstest is not sufficiently discoverable. > > Perhaps you should

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

On 20/06/16 18:03, Ian Jackson wrote: > We are in danger of getting stuck on this naming question. I would > like everyone to put forward some suggestions for the name of thisr > toplevel epo on xenbits. > > Hopefully we can find one that Andrew likes and that's acceptable to > the committers. >

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 06:03:42PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > We are in danger of getting stuck on this naming question. I would > like everyone to put forward some suggestions for the name of thisr > toplevel epo on xenbits. > > Hopefully we can find one that Andrew likes and that's acceptable

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

> xtf-microvm-suite +1 ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

We are in danger of getting stuck on this naming question. I would like everyone to put forward some suggestions for the name of thisr toplevel epo on xenbits. Hopefully we can find one that Andrew likes and that's acceptable to the committers. I suggest xen-microvm-test-framework

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: > On 13/06/16 15:11, Ian Jackson wrote: >> George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was >> Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"): >

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

On 13/06/16 15:11, Ian Jackson wrote: > George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was > Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"): >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Andrew Cooper >>> I am not complete

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 04:04:59PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Roger Pau Monne writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 > bugfix)"): > > This series contains a bugfix for the build infrastructure and a basic > > launcher for XTF. Patches can also be found in the following git repo:

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"): > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Andrew Cooper > > I am not completely averse to changing it, but I don't see an > > alternative whic

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 09/06/16 16:04, Ian Jackson wrote: >> Roger Pau Monne writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 >> bugfix)"): >>> This series contains a bugfix for the build infrastructure and a basic >>>

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

On 09/06/16 16:04, Ian Jackson wrote: > Roger Pau Monne writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 > bugfix)"): >> This series contains a bugfix for the build infrastructure and a basic >> launcher for XTF. Patches can also be found in the following git repo: >> >>

Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Roger Pau Monne writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 > bugfix)"): >> This series contains a bugfix for the build infrastructure and a basic >> launcher for XTF. Patches can also be found in the

[Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

Roger Pau Monne writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"): > This series contains a bugfix for the build infrastructure and a basic > launcher for XTF. Patches can also be found in the following git repo: > > git://xenbits.xen.org/people/royger/xen-test-framework.git