[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 118576: regressions - FAIL

flight 118576 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/118576/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvhv2-amd 12 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 118324

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus bisection] complete build-arm64-pvops

branch xen-unstable xenbranch xen-unstable job build-arm64-pvops testid kernel-build Tree: linux git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git *** Found and reproduced problem changeset *** Bug is in

[Xen-devel] [seabios test] 118568: regressions - FAIL

flight 118568 seabios real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/118568/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop fail REGR. vs. 115539 Tests which did not

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 118566: regressions - FAIL

flight 118566 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/118566/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvhv2-amd 12 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 118324

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 118562: tolerable FAIL

flight 118562 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/118562/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 15 guest-saverestore.2 fail pass in 118551 Tests which did not succeed,

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] pvcalls-back: do not return error on inet_accept EAGAIN

On 02/02/2018 08:34 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: When the client sends a regular blocking accept request, the backend is expected to return only when the accept is completed, simulating a blocking behavior, or return an error. Specifically, on EAGAIN from inet_accept, the backend shouldn't

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: hypercall: fix out-of-bounds memcpy

On 02/04/2018 10:35 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 6:08 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 02/03/2018 10:12 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 12:33 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 02/02/2018 10:32 AM, Arnd

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: hypercall: fix out-of-bounds memcpy

On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 6:08 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > > On 02/03/2018 10:12 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >> On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 12:33 AM, Boris Ostrovsky >> wrote: >>> >>> On 02/02/2018 10:32 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: The

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 118557: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

flight 118557 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/118557/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 saverestore-support-checkfail like 118545 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 14

[Xen-devel] [seabios test] 118558: regressions - FAIL

flight 118558 seabios real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/118558/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop fail REGR. vs. 115539 Tests which did not

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 118556: regressions - FAIL

flight 118556 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/118556/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvhv2-amd 12 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 118324

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 02/17] x86: Support indirect thunks from assembly code

On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 18:00 +, Andrew Cooper wrote: > +#ifdef CONFIG_INDIRECT_THUNK > +    /* callq __x86_indirect_thunk_rcx */ > +    ctxt->io_emul_stub[10] = 0xe8; > +    *(int32_t *)>io_emul_stub[11] = > +    (unsigned long)__x86_indirect_thunk_rcx - (stub_va + 11 + 4); > + > +#else Is

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-coverity test] 118564: all pass - PUSHED

flight 118564 xen-unstable-coverity real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/118564/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: xen 99d9d7a33b781bc9a91416f1e04c8e50e40fa4ef baseline version: xen

[Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 118552: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 118552 linux-4.9 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/118552/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 17 guest-stopfail like 118520 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64