On 13/03/18 18:51, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
>
> On 03/13/2018 01:27 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 12/03/18 20:26, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> Hi Juergen,
>>>
>>> I don't know by which tree those patches should arrive at Linus,
>>> so i can't check if they fell through the cracks somewhere,
On 03/13/2018 01:27 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 12/03/18 20:26, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
Hi Juergen,
I don't know by which tree those patches should arrive at Linus,
so i can't check if they fell through the cracks somewhere, but 4.16-rc5
hasn't got them yet.
They are queued for 4.17 in:
On 12/03/18 20:26, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Hi Juergen,
>
> I don't know by which tree those patches should arrive at Linus,
> so i can't check if they fell through the cracks somewhere, but 4.16-rc5
> hasn't got them yet.
They are queued for 4.17 in:
On 03/12/2018 03:26 PM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 19/02/18 22:13, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 19/02/18 11:16, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 19/02/18 10:47, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
On 24/01/18 16:26, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Juergen Gross
On 19/02/18 22:13, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 19/02/18 11:16, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 19/02/18 10:47, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> On 24/01/18 16:26, George Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 24/01/18 16:07, George Dunlap
On 19/02/18 11:16, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 19/02/18 10:47, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 24/01/18 16:26, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 24/01/18 16:07, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:10 PM, Boris
On 19/02/18 10:47, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 24/01/18 16:26, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 24/01/18 16:07, George Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:10 PM, Boris Ostrovsky
On 24/01/18 16:26, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 24/01/18 16:07, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:10 PM, Boris Ostrovsky
>>> wrote:
On 01/24/2018 07:06 AM, Juergen Gross
On 25/01/18 11:38, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> On 01/24/2018 01:06 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 24/01/18 11:54, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:42:39AM +, George Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Boris Ostrovsky
On 01/24/2018 01:06 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 24/01/18 11:54, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:42:39AM +, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Boris Ostrovsky
>>> wrote:
On 01/18/2018 05:33 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
>
On 01/24/2018 11:15 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 24/01/18 17:10, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
>>
So what is the problem here?
- current Linux can't be booted as PVH guest with xen-unstable due to
a bug in Linux, patches for Linux are being worked on
>> I would prefer for patches
On 24/01/18 17:10, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 01/24/2018 10:26 AM, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 24/01/18 16:07, George Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:10 PM, Boris Ostrovsky
On 01/24/2018 10:26 AM, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 24/01/18 16:07, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:10 PM, Boris Ostrovsky
>>> wrote:
On 01/24/2018 07:06 AM, Juergen Gross
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 24/01/18 16:07, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:10 PM, Boris Ostrovsky
>> wrote:
>>> On 01/24/2018 07:06 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 24/01/18 11:54, Roger Pau Monné
On 24/01/18 16:07, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:10 PM, Boris Ostrovsky
> wrote:
>> On 01/24/2018 07:06 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 24/01/18 11:54, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:42:39AM +, George Dunlap wrote:
>
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:10 PM, Boris Ostrovsky
wrote:
> On 01/24/2018 07:06 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 24/01/18 11:54, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:42:39AM +, George Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Boris Ostrovsky
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 09:42:57AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 01/24/2018 09:25 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > On 24/01/18 15:10, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >>
> >> I suspect we can do as little as removing "#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC" around
> >> acpi_rsdp in drivers/acpi/osl.c and then assigning it
On 01/24/2018 09:25 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 24/01/18 15:10, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>
>> I suspect we can do as little as removing "#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC" around
>> acpi_rsdp in drivers/acpi/osl.c and then assigning it the value in
>> pvh_start_info.rsdp_paddr. (I haven't tried it)
> That was
On 24/01/18 15:10, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 01/24/2018 07:06 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 24/01/18 11:54, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:42:39AM +, George Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Boris Ostrovsky
wrote:
On 24/01/18 11:54, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:42:39AM +, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Boris Ostrovsky
>> wrote:
>>> On 01/18/2018 05:33 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:31:32AM +0100, Juergen
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:42:39AM +, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Boris Ostrovsky
> wrote:
> > On 01/18/2018 05:33 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:31:32AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >>> Wei,
> >>>
> >>> On 01/12/17
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Boris Ostrovsky
wrote:
> On 01/18/2018 05:33 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:31:32AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> Wei,
>>>
>>> On 01/12/17 15:14, Juergen Gross wrote:
Instead of locating the RSDP table below 1MB
On 01/18/2018 05:33 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:31:32AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Wei,
>>
>> On 01/12/17 15:14, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> Instead of locating the RSDP table below 1MB put it just below 4GB
>>> like the rest of the ACPI tables in case of PVH guests. This will
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:31:32AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Wei,
>
> On 01/12/17 15:14, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > Instead of locating the RSDP table below 1MB put it just below 4GB
> > like the rest of the ACPI tables in case of PVH guests. This will
> > avoid punching more holes than
Wei,
On 01/12/17 15:14, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Instead of locating the RSDP table below 1MB put it just below 4GB
> like the rest of the ACPI tables in case of PVH guests. This will
> avoid punching more holes than necessary into the memory map.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 05:20:41PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 19/12/17 17:11, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 04:46:37PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >> On 19/12/17 16:38, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 03:14:07PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>
On 19/12/17 17:11, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 04:46:37PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 19/12/17 16:38, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 03:14:07PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
Instead of locating the RSDP table below 1MB put it just below 4GB
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 04:46:37PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 19/12/17 16:38, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 03:14:07PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >> Instead of locating the RSDP table below 1MB put it just below 4GB
> >> like the rest of the ACPI tables in case of PVH
Juergen Gross writes ("[PATCH v2] libxl: put RSDP for PVH guest near 4GB"):
> Instead of locating the RSDP table below 1MB put it just below 4GB
> like the rest of the ACPI tables in case of PVH guests. This will
> avoid punching more holes than necessary into the memory map.
>
> Signed-off-by:
On 19/12/17 16:38, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 03:14:07PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Instead of locating the RSDP table below 1MB put it just below 4GB
>> like the rest of the ACPI tables in case of PVH guests. This will
>> avoid punching more holes than necessary into the
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 03:14:07PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Instead of locating the RSDP table below 1MB put it just below 4GB
> like the rest of the ACPI tables in case of PVH guests. This will
> avoid punching more holes than necessary into the memory map.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
Ping?
On 01/12/17 15:14, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Instead of locating the RSDP table below 1MB put it just below 4GB
> like the rest of the ACPI tables in case of PVH guests. This will
> avoid punching more holes than necessary into the memory map.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
32 matches
Mail list logo