>>> On 10.07.18 at 13:00, wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:45:16PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 03:48:39PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 09:47:57AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 12:49:00PM +0200, Daniel Kiper
>>> On 10.07.18 at 12:30, wrote:
> On 07/10/2018 11:01 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 10.07.18 at 11:33, wrote:
>>> As far as I can tell there are three possible solutions to this
>>> controversy:
>>>
>>> A. Remove the 'internal' functionality as a target by converting the
>>> current HVMOP
flight 74950 distros-debian-snapshot real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/74950/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-i386-weekly-netinst-pygrub 10 debian-di-install fail like
74931
On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 09:16:38AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 06.07.18 at 16:46, wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 02:35:32AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 04.07.18 at 18:48, wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 09:34:09AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> >>> On 04.07.18 at
On 10/07/18 09:04, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 05:54:44PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> (I feel as if I've sent this email before, but I can't find any record
>> of it).
>>
>> The parameter was introduced in e661d66f51 (2006) and used in Xen, but
>> removed from the
On 10/07/18 09:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.07.18 at 18:54, wrote:
>> The parameter was introduced in e661d66f51 (2006) and used in Xen, but
>> removed from the hypervisor in c/s 5f14a87ce (2008) when CPUID
>> calculations where moved from the hypervisor into libxc.
>>
>> However, the field
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:33:22AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> The altp2m functionality was originally envisioned to be used in
> several different configurations, one of which was a single in-guest
> agent that had full operational control of altp2m. This required the
> single hypercall to be
On 07/10/2018 10:43 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:33:22AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> The altp2m functionality was originally envisioned to be used in
>> several different configurations, one of which was a single in-guest
>> agent that had full operational control of
Having noticed that VMLOAD alone is about as fast as a single of the
involved WRMSRs, I thought it might be a reasonable idea to also use it
for PV. Measurements, however, have shown that an actual improvement can
be achieved only with an early prefetch of the VMCB (thanks to Andrew
for suggesting
For both fs_base and gs_base_user, there are comments saying "This can
only be non-zero if selector is NULL." While save_segments() ensures
this, so far arch_set_info_guest() didn't. Make behavior consistent
(attaching comments identical to those in save_segments()).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 11:28:34AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 07/10/2018 11:23 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH 2/2] MAINTAINERS: use https for git trees"):
> >> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 02:36:49AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 10.07.18 at 10:15, wrote:
>
On 07/10/2018 11:01 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.07.18 at 11:33, wrote:
>> As far as I can tell there are three possible solutions to this
>> controversy:
>>
>> A. Remove the 'internal' functionality as a target by converting the
>> current HVMOP into a DOMCTL.
>>
>> B. Have two hypercalls
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 11:26:45AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH] hvm/altp2m: Clarify the proper way to extend the
> altp2m interface"):
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:33:22AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> > > + * Normally hypercalls made by a program in domain 0 in
On 07/10/2018 11:30 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 11:28:34AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 07/10/2018 11:23 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH 2/2] MAINTAINERS: use https for git trees"):
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 02:36:49AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 09:08:29AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 06.07.18 at 16:02, wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 02:18:03AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 04.07.18 at 18:35, wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 09:27:43AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> >>> On 04.07.18 at
On 07/10/2018 11:59 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> George Dunlap writes ("Re: [PATCH] hvm/altp2m: Clarify the proper way to
> extend the altp2m interface"):
>> On 07/10/2018 11:32 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> We should have a way of remembering the design intent, even if it
>>> hasn't been audited.
>>>
>>> On 10.07.18 at 10:31, wrote:
> The default value of DEFCONFIG_LIST is wrong: it should be the value of
> the configured ARCH_DEFCONFIG item, not the string "$ARCH_DEFCONFIG".
Makse sense and matches Linux, but I'd still prefer to have Doug's
consent here.
Jan
Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH 2/2] MAINTAINERS: use https for git trees"):
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 02:36:49AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 10.07.18 at 10:15, wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
> >
> > What's wrong with git:// ? I think the commit message should be non-
> > empty here.
>
>
Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH] hvm/altp2m: Clarify the proper way to extend the
altp2m interface"):
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:33:22AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> > + * Normally hypercalls made by a program in domain 0 in order to
> > + * control a guest would be DOMCTLs rather than HVMOPs.
On 07/10/2018 11:23 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH 2/2] MAINTAINERS: use https for git trees"):
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 02:36:49AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 10.07.18 at 10:15, wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
>>>
>>> What's wrong with git:// ? I think the commit
George Dunlap writes ("Re: [PATCH] hvm/altp2m: Clarify the proper way to extend
the altp2m interface"):
> On 07/10/2018 11:01 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Or 2a: Include a comment saying the 'internal' interface hasn't been
> evaluated for safety, and don't bother blacklisting new ops until such
> an
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 11:36:33AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 07/10/2018 11:30 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 11:28:34AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 07/10/2018 11:23 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >>> Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH 2/2] MAINTAINERS: use https for git trees"):
On 07/10/2018 11:32 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> George Dunlap writes ("Re: [PATCH] hvm/altp2m: Clarify the proper way to
> extend the altp2m interface"):
>> On 07/10/2018 11:01 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Or 2a: Include a comment saying the 'internal' interface hasn't been
>> evaluated for safety, and
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:45:16PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 03:48:39PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 09:47:57AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 12:49:00PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at
George Dunlap writes ("Re: [PATCH] hvm/altp2m: Clarify the proper way to extend
the altp2m interface"):
> On 07/10/2018 11:32 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > We should have a way of remembering the design intent, even if it
> > hasn't been audited.
> >
> > SUPPORT.md can deal with the possible
On 07/09/2018 09:31 AM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
> On 04/23/2018 05:33 PM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
>> On 04/23/2018 05:28 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 04/23/2018 12:56 PM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
On 04/23/2018 02:47 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 04/18/2018 02:12 PM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
flight 125074 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125074/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 13 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm
flight 125044 xen-4.9-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125044/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-xsm broken in 125005
test-amd64-amd64-xl-xsm
Dear community members,
I'm pleased to announce that Xen 4.11.0 is released.
Please find the tarball and its signature at:
https://xenproject.org/downloads/xen-archives/xen-project-411-series/xen-project-4110.html
You can also check out the tag in xen.git:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 12:45:39PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 10/07/18 09:04, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 05:54:44PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> (I feel as if I've sent this email before, but I can't find any record
> >> of it).
> >>
> >> The parameter
On 07/10/2018 12:58 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.07.18 at 12:30, wrote:
>> On 07/10/2018 11:01 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 10.07.18 at 11:33, wrote:
As far as I can tell there are three possible solutions to this
controversy:
A. Remove the 'internal' functionality
On 07/07/2018 12:05 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
> ...rather than more ambiguous term 'frame'.
>
> There are many places in the grant table code that use a variable or
> field name '.*frame' to refer to a quantity that is strictly an MFN, and
> even has type mfn_t.
> This patch is a purely cosmetic
On 26/04/18 12:52, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 12:48:44PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
>
> Acked-by: Wei Liu
Ping?
Juergen
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
---
tools/libvchan/Makefile | 2 +-
tools/libxc/Makefile| 2 +-
tools/libxl/Makefile| 4 ++--
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/libvchan/Makefile b/tools/libvchan/Makefile
index 8d45fc2411..de9b44978f 100644
---
On 08/05/18 15:06, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 08/05/18 14:56, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 05/08/2018 07:47 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> "make -C docs all" fails due to incorrect markdown syntax in
>>> intel_psr_cat_cdp.pandoc. Correct it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
>>> ---
>>>
On 08/06/18 12:25, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 08/06/18 12:09, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 08/06/18 10:51, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> xencall_alloc_buffer() is used throughout Xen tools for allocating
>>> hypercall buffers. Allocation is done at page granularity. For simple
>>> administration each
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 03:23:46PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 26/04/18 12:52, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 12:48:44PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
> >
> > Acked-by: Wei Liu
>
> Ping?
Oops, this fell through the crack.
I tried to apply it,
On 10/07/18 15:26, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 03:23:46PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 26/04/18 12:52, Wei Liu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 12:48:44PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Wei Liu
>>
>> Ping?
>
> Oops, this fell
Based on discussions in Lars' series.
Wei Liu (2):
MAINTAINERS: drop USB PV DRIVERS entry
MAINTAINERS: use https for git trees
MAINTAINERS | 16 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--
2.11.0
___
Xen-devel mailing
Suggested-by: Jan Beulich
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
---
Cc: Andrew Cooper
Cc: George Dunlap
Cc: Ian Jackson
Cc: Jan Beulich
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Cc: Stefano Stabellini
Cc: Tim Deegan
Cc: Wei Liu
---
MAINTAINERS | 6 --
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 05:54:44PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Hello,
>
> (I feel as if I've sent this email before, but I can't find any record
> of it).
>
> The parameter was introduced in e661d66f51 (2006) and used in Xen, but
> removed from the hypervisor in c/s 5f14a87ce (2008) when CPUID
The default value of DEFCONFIG_LIST is wrong: it should be the value of
the configured ARCH_DEFCONFIG item, not the string "$ARCH_DEFCONFIG".
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
---
xen/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xen/Kconfig b/xen/Kconfig
index
>>> On 10.07.18 at 10:15, wrote:
> Suggested-by: Jan Beulich
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
Acked-by: Jan Beulich
Thanks for remembering this - I had long forgotten.
Jan
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 11:29:48AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> After attempting to develop the infrastructure, it turns out that the choice
> of naming is suboptimal.
>
> Rename msr_domain_policy to just msr_policy to mirror the CPUID side of
> things, and alter the 'dp' variable name
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 12:14:23PM -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 04:32:13PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Stubdom's dependency newlib needs it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
>
> Could we consider <20180709170546.4102-1-car...@cardoe.com> instead?
>
>
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 11:46:59AM -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 04:32:14PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > They are needed to build tools.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
> > ---
> > automation/build/centos/7.2.dockerfile | 6 ++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
>
Avoid having error messages with the same text. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné
---
Cc: Jan Beulich
Cc: Andrew Cooper
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 11:29:47AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> ... and use it in place of the opencoded instances.
>
> For consistency, restructure init_domain_cpuid_policy() to be like
> init_{domain,vcpu}_msr_policy() by operating on the local pointer where
> possible.
>
> No change in
> On Jul 10, 2018, at 9:15 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
Why?
-George
> ---
> Cc: Andrew Cooper
> Cc: George Dunlap
> Cc: Ian Jackson
> Cc: Jan Beulich
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini
> Cc: Tim Deegan
> Cc: Wei Liu
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 10
>>> On 10.07.18 at 10:15, wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
What's wrong with git:// ? I think the commit message should be non-
empty here.
Jan
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 02:36:49AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 10.07.18 at 10:15, wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
>
> What's wrong with git:// ? I think the commit message should be non-
> empty here.
git: is not encrypted, while https: is. At this time of age, it is
better to use
>>> On 10.07.18 at 10:32, wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 11:29:47AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> --- a/xen/include/xen/xmalloc.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/xmalloc.h
>> @@ -13,6 +13,16 @@
>> #define xmalloc(_type) ((_type *)_xmalloc(sizeof(_type),
> __alignof__(_type)))
>> #define
>>> On 10.07.18 at 10:04, wrote:
> Avoid having error messages with the same text. No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné
Acked-by: Jan Beulich
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
On 10/07/2018 09:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.07.18 at 10:32, wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 11:29:47AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/include/xen/xmalloc.h
>>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/xmalloc.h
>>> @@ -13,6 +13,16 @@
>>> #define xmalloc(_type) ((_type *)_xmalloc(sizeof(_type),
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 09:47:01AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 10/07/2018 09:39, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 02:36:49AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 10.07.18 at 10:15, wrote:
> >>> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
> >> What's wrong with git:// ? I think the commit message
>>> On 09.07.18 at 18:54, wrote:
> The parameter was introduced in e661d66f51 (2006) and used in Xen, but
> removed from the hypervisor in c/s 5f14a87ce (2008) when CPUID
> calculations where moved from the hypervisor into libxc.
>
> However, the field has always been propagated in the migration
>>> On 10.07.18 at 10:44, wrote:
> On 10/07/2018 09:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 10.07.18 at 10:32, wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 11:29:47AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
--- a/xen/include/xen/xmalloc.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/xmalloc.h
@@ -13,6 +13,16 @@
#define
The altp2m functionality was originally envisioned to be used in
several different configurations, one of which was a single in-guest
agent that had full operational control of altp2m. This required the
single hypercall to be an HVMOP, which is the only type of hypercall
an HVM guest is allowed
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:33:22AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> The altp2m functionality was originally envisioned to be used in
> several different configurations, one of which was a single in-guest
> agent that had full operational control of altp2m. This required the
> single hypercall to be
Wei Liu (3):
libxl/vsnd: add missing error checks
xl/vsnd: use xcalloc to allocate memory for parser
xl/vsnd: initialise rc in dryrun path
tools/libxl/libxl_vsnd.c | 2 ++
tools/xl/xl_parse.c | 12 ++--
tools/xl/xl_vsnd.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6
Reported-by: Coverity
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
---
tools/libxl/libxl_vsnd.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_vsnd.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_vsnd.c
index cf46e3ddb1..9570a4cf0e 100644
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_vsnd.c
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_vsnd.c
@@ -192,6 +192,7
... because it handles errors for us.
Reported-by: Coverity
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
---
tools/xl/xl_parse.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/xl/xl_parse.c b/tools/xl/xl_parse.c
index 3ebf6d9023..f9147f6a5c 100644
--- a/tools/xl/xl_parse.c
+++
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 05:47:19AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 10.07.18 at 13:00, wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:45:16PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> Sorry for asking so many questions, but I would like to try to avoid
> >> the DEFINED conditional in the linker script if
Wei Liu writes ("[PATCH 0/3] xl/libxl: fixes for vsnd "):
> Wei Liu (3):
> libxl/vsnd: add missing error checks
> xl/vsnd: use xcalloc to allocate memory for parser
> xl/vsnd: initialise rc in dryrun path
All three,
Acked-by: Ian Jackson
___
>>> On 10.07.18 at 12:48, wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 09:08:29AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 06.07.18 at 16:02, wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 02:18:03AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> >>> On 04.07.18 at 18:35, wrote:
>> >> > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 09:27:43AM -0600, Jan
>>> On 10.07.18 at 13:35, wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 09:16:38AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 06.07.18 at 16:46, wrote:
>> > OK, xen.mb.efi does not need relocs because:
>> > - we generate PE file from xen-syms file like we do with ELF output;
>> > so, the code in the PE file
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 03:24:33PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 08/05/18 15:06, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > On 08/05/18 14:56, George Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 05/08/2018 07:47 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >>> "make -C docs all" fails due to incorrect markdown syntax in
> >>> intel_psr_cat_cdp.pandoc.
>>> On 10.07.18 at 16:08, wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dunl...@gmail.com [mailto:dunl...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
>> George Dunlap
>> Sent: 10 July 2018 14:47
>> To: Paul Durrant
>> Cc: xen-devel ; Kevin Tian
>> ; Stefano Stabellini ;
>> Suravee Suthikulpanit ; Julien Grall
>> ;
>>> On 10.07.18 at 16:29, wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
>>> @@ -2676,13 +2676,12 @@ static int _get_page_type(struct page_info *page,
> unsigned long type,
>>> struct domain *d =
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: 10 July 2018 15:29
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: Julien Grall ; Andrew Cooper
> ; George Dunlap
> ; Ian Jackson ; Wei Liu
> ; Jun Nakajima ; Kevin Tian
> ; Stefano Stabellini ; xen-
> devel ; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> ;
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 02:29:08PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 27-06-18 09:44:21, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > This is the v2 of RFC based on the feedback I've received so far. The
> > code even compiles as a bonus ;) I haven't runtime tested it yet, mostly
> > because I have no idea how.
> >
>
Reported-by: Coverity
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
---
tools/xl/xl_vsnd.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/tools/xl/xl_vsnd.c b/tools/xl/xl_vsnd.c
index 6dd3a901b2..3306b93139 100644
--- a/tools/xl/xl_vsnd.c
+++ b/tools/xl/xl_vsnd.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ int main_vsndattach(int argc,
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
> @@ -651,34 +651,34 @@ int amd_iommu_map_page(struct domain *d, unsigned long
> gfn, unsigned long mfn,
> if ( rc )
> {
> spin_unlock(>arch.mapping_lock);
> -AMD_IOMMU_DEBUG("Root table alloc failed, gfn = %lx\n",
On 07/07/2018 12:05 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
> This patch modifies the declaration of the entry points to the IOMMU
> sub-system to use bfn_t and mfn_t in place of unsigned long. A subsequent
> patch will similarly modify the methods in the iommu_ops structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant
>
>>> On 10.07.18 at 15:49, wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 05:47:19AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 10.07.18 at 13:00, wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:45:16PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> >> Sorry for asking so many questions, but I would like to try to avoid
>> >> the DEFINED
> -Original Message-
> From: dunl...@gmail.com [mailto:dunl...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> George Dunlap
> Sent: 10 July 2018 14:47
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: xen-devel ; Kevin Tian
> ; Stefano Stabellini ;
> Suravee Suthikulpanit ; Julien Grall
> ; Jan Beulich
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel]
> -Original Message-
> From: George Dunlap [mailto:george.dun...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 10 July 2018 15:01
> To: Paul Durrant ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
> Cc: Jan Beulich ; Andrew Cooper
> ; George Dunlap
> ; Ian Jackson ; Konrad
> Rzeszutek Wilk ; Stefano Stabellini
> ; Julien Grall ;
On Tue 10-07-18 16:40:40, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 02:29:08PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 27-06-18 09:44:21, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > This is the v2 of RFC based on the feedback I've received so far. The
> > > code even compiles as a bonus ;) I haven't runtime
flight 125073 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125073/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 9edba51f93d8e81e09f905afc994efe02dbe524e
baseline version:
ovmf
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
>> @@ -2676,13 +2676,12 @@ static int _get_page_type(struct page_info *page,
>> unsigned long type,
>> struct domain *d = page_get_owner(page);
>> if ( d && is_pv_domain(d)
>>> On 10.07.18 at 16:10, wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: George Dunlap [mailto:george.dun...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: 10 July 2018 15:01
>> To: Paul Durrant ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
>> Cc: Jan Beulich ; Andrew Cooper
>> ; George Dunlap
>> ; Ian Jackson ; Konrad
>> Rzeszutek
flight 125076 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125076/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 13 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm
On 10/07/18 15:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.07.18 at 16:29, wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
@@ -2676,13 +2676,12 @@ static int _get_page_type(struct page_info *page,
>> unsigned long type,
Currently it's possible to hit an assertion in alloc_heap_pages():
Assertion 'first_dirty != INVALID_DIRTY_IDX || !(pg[i].count_info &
PGC_need_scrub)' failed at page_alloc.c:988
This can happen because a piece of logic to calculate first_dirty
during block merging in free_heap_pages() is
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.07.18 at 16:29, wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
@@ -2676,13 +2676,12 @@ static int _get_page_type(struct page_info *page,
>> unsigned long
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 03:25:07PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 08/06/18 12:25, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > On 08/06/18 12:09, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> On 08/06/18 10:51, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >>> xencall_alloc_buffer() is used throughout Xen tools for allocating
> >>> hypercall buffers.
Hi all,
you can find the proposed agenda at
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fWQMuiblTmiNkWGGNbz20AQtbbnvtohxnUjhX2pA2jU/edit?usp=sharing
covering essentially
* Release Cadence for Xen 4.12
* Project Management stuff to keep the Momentum going
There could be other items which we could add,
>>> On 10.07.18 at 16:58, wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 10.07.18 at 16:29, wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
> @@ -2676,13 +2676,12 @@ static int
On 07/10/2018 11:15 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.07.18 at 16:49, wrote:
>> Currently it's possible to hit an assertion in alloc_heap_pages():
>>
>> Assertion 'first_dirty != INVALID_DIRTY_IDX || !(pg[i].count_info &
>> PGC_need_scrub)' failed at page_alloc.c:988
>>
>> This can happen
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
> @@ -787,7 +793,9 @@ int amd_iommu_reserve_domain_unity_map(struct domain
> *domain,
> gfn = phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> for ( i = 0; i < npages; i++ )
> {
> -rt = amd_iommu_map_page(domain, gfn +i, gfn +i, flags);
> +
Hi Stefano,
On 10/07/18 00:02, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, Julien Grall wrote:
On 07/07/18 00:11, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
mfn_t smfn;
paddr_t start, size;
+struct membank *bank;
smfn = page_to_mfn(pg);
start = mfn_to_maddr(smfn);
The new
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 08:09:06AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 10.07.18 at 15:49, wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 05:47:19AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 10.07.18 at 13:00, wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:45:16PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> >> Sorry for asking
On 07/07/2018 12:05 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
> This patch modifies the declaration of the entry points to the IOMMU
> sub-system to use bfn_t and mfn_t in place of unsigned long. A subsequent
> patch will similarly modify the methods in the iommu_ops structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant
>
On 07/10/2018 05:18 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: George Dunlap [mailto:george.dun...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: 10 July 2018 17:13
>> To: Paul Durrant ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
>> Cc: Jan Beulich ; Andrew Cooper
>> ; George Dunlap
>> ; Ian Jackson ; Konrad
>>
On 07/07/2018 12:05 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
> Turn iommu_map/unmap_page() into straightforward wrappers that check the
> existence of the relevant iommu_op and call through to it. This makes them
> usable by PV IOMMU code to be delivered in future patches.
> Leave the decision on whether to invoke
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 04:14:10PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 10-07-18 16:40:40, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 02:29:08PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Wed 27-06-18 09:44:21, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > This is the v2 of RFC based on the feedback I've received
Hi,
On 09/07/18 22:51, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
I would replace this with a BUG_ON(evtchn != 0).
I agree with the principle, but I think you meant
BUG_ON(d->arch.evtchn_irq <= 0) ?
The IRQ is an unsigned number. So why <= 0?
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Juergen Gross
commit 74899d92e3dc7671a8017b3146dcd4735f3b upstream.
Commit:
1f50ddb4f418 ("x86/speculation: Handle HT correctly on AMD")
... added speculative_store_bypass_ht_init() to
> -Original Message-
> From: George Dunlap [mailto:george.dun...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 10 July 2018 17:13
> To: Paul Durrant ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
> Cc: Jan Beulich ; Andrew Cooper
> ; George Dunlap
> ; Ian Jackson ; Konrad
> Rzeszutek Wilk ; Stefano Stabellini
> ; Julien Grall ;
flight 125049 linux-4.14 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125049/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-libvirt6 libvirt-build fail in 125009 REGR. vs. 124389
Tests which are
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
