Re: [Xen-devel] Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction
Alright: 17:00-18:00 it is. I will send out a separate mail with call-in details Lars On 23/04/2018, 15:24, "Chao Gao" wrote: On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:12:22PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote: >On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 08:26:59AM +, Lars Kurth wrote: >>Hi all, >>so it seems we have no perfect slot proposals, but 2 semi-perfect. >>May 2nd: 16:00 - 17:00 Christopher can't attend >>May 2nd: 17:00 - 18:00 Chao can't attend >>Maybe a compromise would be 16:30 to 17:30 > >Hi Lars, > >Your suggestion is fine with me. 16:00-17:00 is also acceptable to me. I I meant 17:00-18:00 here. Thanks Chao >don't want Christopher can't attend the whole meeting because I am just >interested in this discussion and won't provide useful suggestions >during the discussion. > >Thanks >Chao > >>Regards >>Lars >> >>On 21/04/2018, 05:47, "Alexey G" wrote: >> >>On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 11:01:49 +0100 >>Roger Pau Monné wrote: >> >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:50:00PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12/04/2018, 17:41, "Roger Pau Monne" >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:32:57PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >may work. For me Mon, Wed and Fri’s generally work at those >>>> > time-slots. Next week is a little busy for me, so I would >>>> > prefer the following week. If you could fill out the following >>>> > Google poll, if this week works that would be great. Otherwise >>>> > please scream. >>>> >>>> I'm afraid I'm on vacations from the 21st to the 29th of April, >>>> so I won't be able to join the meeting unless we move it to the week >>>> after. Let's see what people think of the current dates. >>>> >>>> Roger. >>>> >>>> Hi, I changed the dates to the week after. Poll so far has been >>>> invalidated. >>>> >>>> See https://doodle.com/poll/gdnmcrvnibmw563n >>> >>>Thanks! I've already fixed my vote. >>> >>>I guess this will come later, but we need a clear agenda of items >>>because the x86 and ARM topics are probably going to be completely >>>different (albeit all related to PCI). >>> >>>Roger. >> >>1. different approaches to handle some critical chipset-specific >> registers (MCH PCIEXBAR first of all), currently emulated by >> QEMU. Role of QEMU in the emulation of MMCONFIG accesses. >> >>2. MMIO hole sizing in general (for HVM) -- in which PT usecases this is >> needed, requirements, limitations. It is related to the emulated >> chipset-specific resources and depends on the chosen solution for #1. >> >>I'll try to describe different possible implementations how to make the >>multiple PCI device emulators feature compatible with emulated MMCONFIG >>before the meeting, to have a ground for discussion. There are at least >>3 possible directions currently to solve this problem. >> >> >>___ >>Xen-devel mailing list >>Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:12:22PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote: >On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 08:26:59AM +, Lars Kurth wrote: >>Hi all, >>so it seems we have no perfect slot proposals, but 2 semi-perfect. >>May 2nd: 16:00 - 17:00 Christopher can't attend >>May 2nd: 17:00 - 18:00 Chao can't attend >>Maybe a compromise would be 16:30 to 17:30 > >Hi Lars, > >Your suggestion is fine with me. 16:00-17:00 is also acceptable to me. I I meant 17:00-18:00 here. Thanks Chao >don't want Christopher can't attend the whole meeting because I am just >interested in this discussion and won't provide useful suggestions >during the discussion. > >Thanks >Chao > >>Regards >>Lars >> >>On 21/04/2018, 05:47, "Alexey G" wrote: >> >>On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 11:01:49 +0100 >>Roger Pau Monné wrote: >> >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:50:00PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12/04/2018, 17:41, "Roger Pau Monne" >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:32:57PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >may work. For me Mon, Wed and Fri’s generally work at those >>>> > time-slots. Next week is a little busy for me, so I would >>>> > prefer the following week. If you could fill out the following >>>> > Google poll, if this week works that would be great. Otherwise >>>> > please scream. >>>> >>>> I'm afraid I'm on vacations from the 21st to the 29th of April, >>>> so I won't be able to join the meeting unless we move it to the week >>>> after. Let's see what people think of the current dates. >>>> >>>> Roger. >>>> >>>> Hi, I changed the dates to the week after. Poll so far has been >>>> invalidated. >>>> >>>> See https://doodle.com/poll/gdnmcrvnibmw563n >>> >>>Thanks! I've already fixed my vote. >>> >>>I guess this will come later, but we need a clear agenda of items >>>because the x86 and ARM topics are probably going to be completely >>>different (albeit all related to PCI). >>> >>>Roger. >> >>1. different approaches to handle some critical chipset-specific >> registers (MCH PCIEXBAR first of all), currently emulated by >> QEMU. Role of QEMU in the emulation of MMCONFIG accesses. >> >>2. MMIO hole sizing in general (for HVM) -- in which PT usecases this is >> needed, requirements, limitations. It is related to the emulated >> chipset-specific resources and depends on the chosen solution for #1. >> >>I'll try to describe different possible implementations how to make the >>multiple PCI device emulators feature compatible with emulated MMCONFIG >>before the meeting, to have a ground for discussion. There are at least >>3 possible directions currently to solve this problem. >> >> >>___ >>Xen-devel mailing list >>Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 08:26:59AM +, Lars Kurth wrote: >Hi all, >so it seems we have no perfect slot proposals, but 2 semi-perfect. >May 2nd: 16:00 - 17:00 Christopher can't attend >May 2nd: 17:00 - 18:00 Chao can't attend >Maybe a compromise would be 16:30 to 17:30 Hi Lars, Your suggestion is fine with me. 16:00-17:00 is also acceptable to me. I don't want Christopher can't attend the whole meeting because I am just interested in this discussion and won't provide useful suggestions during the discussion. Thanks Chao >Regards >Lars > >On 21/04/2018, 05:47, "Alexey G" wrote: > >On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 11:01:49 +0100 >Roger Pau Monné wrote: > >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:50:00PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 12/04/2018, 17:41, "Roger Pau Monne" >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:32:57PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: >>> >>> >>> >may work. For me Mon, Wed and Fri’s generally work at those >>> > time-slots. Next week is a little busy for me, so I would >>> > prefer the following week. If you could fill out the following >>> > Google poll, if this week works that would be great. Otherwise >>> > please scream. >>> >>> I'm afraid I'm on vacations from the 21st to the 29th of April, >>> so I won't be able to join the meeting unless we move it to the week >>> after. Let's see what people think of the current dates. >>> >>> Roger. >>> >>> Hi, I changed the dates to the week after. Poll so far has been >>> invalidated. >>> >>> See https://doodle.com/poll/gdnmcrvnibmw563n >> >>Thanks! I've already fixed my vote. >> >>I guess this will come later, but we need a clear agenda of items >>because the x86 and ARM topics are probably going to be completely >>different (albeit all related to PCI). >> >>Roger. > >1. different approaches to handle some critical chipset-specific > registers (MCH PCIEXBAR first of all), currently emulated by > QEMU. Role of QEMU in the emulation of MMCONFIG accesses. > >2. MMIO hole sizing in general (for HVM) -- in which PT usecases this is > needed, requirements, limitations. It is related to the emulated > chipset-specific resources and depends on the chosen solution for #1. > >I'll try to describe different possible implementations how to make the >multiple PCI device emulators feature compatible with emulated MMCONFIG >before the meeting, to have a ground for discussion. There are at least >3 possible directions currently to solve this problem. > > >___ >Xen-devel mailing list >Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction
Hi all, so it seems we have no perfect slot proposals, but 2 semi-perfect. May 2nd: 16:00 - 17:00 Christopher can't attend May 2nd: 17:00 - 18:00 Chao can't attend Maybe a compromise would be 16:30 to 17:30 Regards Lars On 21/04/2018, 05:47, "Alexey G" wrote: On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 11:01:49 +0100 Roger Pau Monné wrote: >On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:50:00PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: >> >> >> On 12/04/2018, 17:41, "Roger Pau Monne" >> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:32:57PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: >> >> >> >may work. For me Mon, Wed and Fri’s generally work at those >> > time-slots. Next week is a little busy for me, so I would >> > prefer the following week. If you could fill out the following >> > Google poll, if this week works that would be great. Otherwise >> > please scream. >> >> I'm afraid I'm on vacations from the 21st to the 29th of April, >> so I won't be able to join the meeting unless we move it to the week >> after. Let's see what people think of the current dates. >> >> Roger. >> >> Hi, I changed the dates to the week after. Poll so far has been >> invalidated. >> >> See https://doodle.com/poll/gdnmcrvnibmw563n > >Thanks! I've already fixed my vote. > >I guess this will come later, but we need a clear agenda of items >because the x86 and ARM topics are probably going to be completely >different (albeit all related to PCI). > >Roger. 1. different approaches to handle some critical chipset-specific registers (MCH PCIEXBAR first of all), currently emulated by QEMU. Role of QEMU in the emulation of MMCONFIG accesses. 2. MMIO hole sizing in general (for HVM) -- in which PT usecases this is needed, requirements, limitations. It is related to the emulated chipset-specific resources and depends on the chosen solution for #1. I'll try to describe different possible implementations how to make the multiple PCI device emulators feature compatible with emulated MMCONFIG before the meeting, to have a ground for discussion. There are at least 3 possible directions currently to solve this problem. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction
On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 11:01:49 +0100 Roger Pau Monné wrote: >On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:50:00PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: >> >> >> On 12/04/2018, 17:41, "Roger Pau Monne" >> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:32:57PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: >> >> >> >may work. For me Mon, Wed and Fri’s generally work at those >> > time-slots. Next week is a little busy for me, so I would >> > prefer the following week. If you could fill out the following >> > Google poll, if this week works that would be great. Otherwise >> > please scream. >> >> I'm afraid I'm on vacations from the 21st to the 29th of April, >> so I won't be able to join the meeting unless we move it to the week >> after. Let's see what people think of the current dates. >> >> Roger. >> >> Hi, I changed the dates to the week after. Poll so far has been >> invalidated. >> >> See https://doodle.com/poll/gdnmcrvnibmw563n > >Thanks! I've already fixed my vote. > >I guess this will come later, but we need a clear agenda of items >because the x86 and ARM topics are probably going to be completely >different (albeit all related to PCI). > >Roger. 1. different approaches to handle some critical chipset-specific registers (MCH PCIEXBAR first of all), currently emulated by QEMU. Role of QEMU in the emulation of MMCONFIG accesses. 2. MMIO hole sizing in general (for HVM) -- in which PT usecases this is needed, requirements, limitations. It is related to the emulated chipset-specific resources and depends on the chosen solution for #1. I'll try to describe different possible implementations how to make the multiple PCI device emulators feature compatible with emulated MMCONFIG before the meeting, to have a ground for discussion. There are at least 3 possible directions currently to solve this problem. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction
On Sat, 14 Apr 2018, Paul Durrant wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Roger Pau Monne > > Sent: 13 April 2018 20:53 > > To: Lars Kurth > > Cc: xen-devel ; Daniel Smith > > ; Alexey G ; Stefano > > Stabellini ; Julien Grall ; > > Paul > > Durrant ; Christopher Clark > > ; Rich Persaud > > Subject: Re: Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction > > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:59:15PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 13/04/2018, 11:01, "Roger Pau Monne" wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:50:00PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/04/2018, 17:41, "Roger Pau Monne" > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:32:57PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >may work. For me Mon, Wed and Fri’s generally work at those > > time-slots. > > > > >Next week is a little busy for me, so I would prefer the > > > following > > week. > > > > >If you could fill out the following Google poll, if this > > > week works > > that > > > > >would be great. Otherwise please scream. > > > > > > > > I'm afraid I'm on vacations from the 21st to the 29th of April, > > > so I > > > > won't be able to join the meeting unless we move it to the week > > after. > > > > Let's see what people think of the current dates. > > > > > > > > Roger. > > > > > > > > Hi, I changed the dates to the week after. Poll so far has been > > invalidated. > > > > > > > > See https://doodle.com/poll/gdnmcrvnibmw563n > > > > > > Thanks! I've already fixed my vote. > > > > > > I guess this will come later, but we need a clear agenda of items > > > because the x86 and ARM topics are probably going to be completely > > > different (albeit all related to PCI). > > > > > > Royger: I am OK with trying to get a draft agenda in place in this e-mail > > thread. But I can't drive this, as I don’t understand the issues. But I am > > happy > > to collate everything as for the x86 call and write up minutes > > > > On the x86 side: > > > > - Q35 HVM emulation, adding MCFG support to guests. > > One of the issues here is support for multiple external emulators w.r.t. > config space access. > > > - PVH guest pci-passthrough: using the internal vPCI infrastructure. > > Let's not distinguish between HVM or PVH here. We want to use the same > passthrough mechanisms for both. Ideally, we'll use the same mechanism for ARM too.___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction
> -Original Message- > From: Roger Pau Monne > Sent: 13 April 2018 20:53 > To: Lars Kurth > Cc: xen-devel ; Daniel Smith > ; Alexey G ; Stefano > Stabellini ; Julien Grall ; Paul > Durrant ; Christopher Clark > ; Rich Persaud > Subject: Re: Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:59:15PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > > > > On 13/04/2018, 11:01, "Roger Pau Monne" wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:50:00PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 12/04/2018, 17:41, "Roger Pau Monne" > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:32:57PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > > > > > > > >may work. For me Mon, Wed and Fri’s generally work at those > time-slots. > > > >Next week is a little busy for me, so I would prefer the > > following > week. > > > >If you could fill out the following Google poll, if this > > week works > that > > > >would be great. Otherwise please scream. > > > > > > I'm afraid I'm on vacations from the 21st to the 29th of April, > > so I > > > won't be able to join the meeting unless we move it to the week > after. > > > Let's see what people think of the current dates. > > > > > > Roger. > > > > > > Hi, I changed the dates to the week after. Poll so far has been > invalidated. > > > > > > See https://doodle.com/poll/gdnmcrvnibmw563n > > > > Thanks! I've already fixed my vote. > > > > I guess this will come later, but we need a clear agenda of items > > because the x86 and ARM topics are probably going to be completely > > different (albeit all related to PCI). > > > > Royger: I am OK with trying to get a draft agenda in place in this e-mail > thread. But I can't drive this, as I don’t understand the issues. But I am > happy > to collate everything as for the x86 call and write up minutes > > On the x86 side: > > - Q35 HVM emulation, adding MCFG support to guests. One of the issues here is support for multiple external emulators w.r.t. config space access. > - PVH guest pci-passthrough: using the internal vPCI infrastructure. Let's not distinguish between HVM or PVH here. We want to use the same passthrough mechanisms for both. Cheers, Paul > > At least that I can think of ATM. > > Roger. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:59:15PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > On 13/04/2018, 11:01, "Roger Pau Monne" wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:50:00PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > > > > On 12/04/2018, 17:41, "Roger Pau Monne" wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:32:57PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > > > > >may work. For me Mon, Wed and Fri’s generally work at those > time-slots. > > >Next week is a little busy for me, so I would prefer the > following week. > > >If you could fill out the following Google poll, if this week > works that > > >would be great. Otherwise please scream. > > > > I'm afraid I'm on vacations from the 21st to the 29th of April, so I > > won't be able to join the meeting unless we move it to the week > after. > > Let's see what people think of the current dates. > > > > Roger. > > > > Hi, I changed the dates to the week after. Poll so far has been > invalidated. > > > > See https://doodle.com/poll/gdnmcrvnibmw563n > > Thanks! I've already fixed my vote. > > I guess this will come later, but we need a clear agenda of items > because the x86 and ARM topics are probably going to be completely > different (albeit all related to PCI). > > Royger: I am OK with trying to get a draft agenda in place in this e-mail > thread. But I can't drive this, as I don’t understand the issues. But I am > happy to collate everything as for the x86 call and write up minutes On the x86 side: - Q35 HVM emulation, adding MCFG support to guests. - PVH guest pci-passthrough: using the internal vPCI infrastructure. At least that I can think of ATM. Roger. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction
On 13/04/2018, 11:01, "Roger Pau Monne" wrote: On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:50:00PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > On 12/04/2018, 17:41, "Roger Pau Monne" wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:32:57PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > >may work. For me Mon, Wed and Fri’s generally work at those time-slots. > >Next week is a little busy for me, so I would prefer the following week. > >If you could fill out the following Google poll, if this week works that > >would be great. Otherwise please scream. > > I'm afraid I'm on vacations from the 21st to the 29th of April, so I > won't be able to join the meeting unless we move it to the week after. > Let's see what people think of the current dates. > > Roger. > > Hi, I changed the dates to the week after. Poll so far has been invalidated. > > See https://doodle.com/poll/gdnmcrvnibmw563n Thanks! I've already fixed my vote. I guess this will come later, but we need a clear agenda of items because the x86 and ARM topics are probably going to be completely different (albeit all related to PCI). Royger: I am OK with trying to get a draft agenda in place in this e-mail thread. But I can't drive this, as I don’t understand the issues. But I am happy to collate everything as for the x86 call and write up minutes Lars ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:50:00PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > On 12/04/2018, 17:41, "Roger Pau Monne" wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:32:57PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > >may work. For me Mon, Wed and Fri’s generally work at those > time-slots. > >Next week is a little busy for me, so I would prefer the following > week. > >If you could fill out the following Google poll, if this week works > that > >would be great. Otherwise please scream. > > I'm afraid I'm on vacations from the 21st to the 29th of April, so I > won't be able to join the meeting unless we move it to the week after. > Let's see what people think of the current dates. > > Roger. > > Hi, I changed the dates to the week after. Poll so far has been invalidated. > > See https://doodle.com/poll/gdnmcrvnibmw563n Thanks! I've already fixed my vote. I guess this will come later, but we need a clear agenda of items because the x86 and ARM topics are probably going to be completely different (albeit all related to PCI). Roger. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction
On 13/04/2018, 09:13, "Jan Beulich" wrote: >>> On 12.04.18 at 18:32, wrote: > I had an action to set up a call on discussing the future direction of PCI > Emulation. I CC’ed everyone who raised an interest. I propose to use > Gotomeeting unless there are objections. FTR - I had expressed an interest too; I can't really plan for the next week or two though at this point, so I'd join if I can whenever the meeting takes place. Apologies: I must have missed this. The meeting is currently scheduled the 1st week of May, with May 2nd & 4th 17:00-18:00 BST (UTC+1) looking like the most promising options. This is outside the 1-2 week window you mention above. Unless I hear otherwise, I am assuming that week is fine. Regards Lars ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction
>>> On 12.04.18 at 18:32, wrote: > I had an action to set up a call on discussing the future direction of PCI > Emulation. I CC’ed everyone who raised an interest. I propose to use > Gotomeeting unless there are objections. FTR - I had expressed an interest too; I can't really plan for the next week or two though at this point, so I'd join if I can whenever the meeting takes place. Jan ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 16:32:57 + Lars Kurth wrote: >Hi all, > >I had an action to set up a call on discussing the future direction of >PCI Emulation. I CC’ed everyone who raised an interest. I propose to >use Gotomeeting unless there are objections. > >As far as I can tell, we have people in the following time-zones: PST >to EST and BST. Not sure where Alexey is based, but it looks as if > >16:00 – 17:00 BST >17:00 – 18:00 BST >18:00 – 19:00 BST >BST = UTC+1 Ideally, any time before 17:00 UTC would be preferable for my timezone (UTC+10), but the 18:00 – 19:00 BST option should ok too (although much less preferable, unticked '18:00–19:00 BST' checkboxes in the poll to reflect this). >may work. For me Mon, Wed and Fri’s generally work at those >time-slots. Next week is a little busy for me, so I would prefer the >following week. If you could fill out the following Google poll, if >this week works that would be great. Otherwise please scream. > >https://doodle.com/poll/gdnmcrvnibmw563n > ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction
On 12/04/2018, 17:41, "Roger Pau Monne" wrote: On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:32:57PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: >may work. For me Mon, Wed and Fri’s generally work at those time-slots. >Next week is a little busy for me, so I would prefer the following week. >If you could fill out the following Google poll, if this week works that >would be great. Otherwise please scream. I'm afraid I'm on vacations from the 21st to the 29th of April, so I won't be able to join the meeting unless we move it to the week after. Let's see what people think of the current dates. Roger. Hi, I changed the dates to the week after. Poll so far has been invalidated. See https://doodle.com/poll/gdnmcrvnibmw563n Lars ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:32:57PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: >Hi all, > > > >I had an action to set up a call on discussing the future direction of PCI >Emulation. I CC’ed everyone who raised an interest. I propose to use >Gotomeeting unless there are objections. > > > >As far as I can tell, we have people in the following time-zones: PST to >EST and BST. Not sure where Alexey is based, but it looks as if > > > >16:00 – 17:00 BST > >17:00 – 18:00 BST > >18:00 – 19:00 BST > >BST = UTC+1 > > > >may work. For me Mon, Wed and Fri’s generally work at those time-slots. >Next week is a little busy for me, so I would prefer the following week. >If you could fill out the following Google poll, if this week works that >would be great. Otherwise please scream. I'm afraid I'm on vacations from the 21st to the 29th of April, so I won't be able to join the meeting unless we move it to the week after. Let's see what people think of the current dates. Roger. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Setting up a call to discuss PCI Emulation - Future Direction
Hi all, I had an action to set up a call on discussing the future direction of PCI Emulation. I CC’ed everyone who raised an interest. I propose to use Gotomeeting unless there are objections. As far as I can tell, we have people in the following time-zones: PST to EST and BST. Not sure where Alexey is based, but it looks as if 16:00 – 17:00 BST 17:00 – 18:00 BST 18:00 – 19:00 BST BST = UTC+1 may work. For me Mon, Wed and Fri’s generally work at those time-slots. Next week is a little busy for me, so I would prefer the following week. If you could fill out the following Google poll, if this week works that would be great. Otherwise please scream. https://doodle.com/poll/gdnmcrvnibmw563n If you are not on the CC list and want to be CC’ed on the invite, please add your e-mail address to the google poll (after your name) Regards Lars ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
