RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] A strange issue when VTI guest vcpus number is near pcpus

2009-05-06 Thread You, Yongkang
On Thursday, May 07, 2009 10:22 AM Isaku Yamahata wrote: On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 01:54:15PM +0800, You, Yongkang wrote: On xen-ia64-devel-boun...@lists.xensource.com wrote: Hi, When I try recently Xen (Xen 3.4 rc3) on IA64 machine (Tiger4), I found some strange issue. My two systems

[Xen-ia64-devel] A strange issue when VTI guest vcpus number is near pcpus

2009-05-05 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi, When I try recently Xen (Xen 3.4 rc3) on IA64 machine (Tiger4), I found some strange issue. My two systems have 4 and 8 pcpus separately If VTI guest's vcpus is near pcpus, guest booting will meet some issues: 1. Guest boot might be hang at switch to new root and run init; unmounting old

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] A strange issue when VTI guest vcpus number is near pcpus

2009-05-05 Thread You, Yongkang
On xen-ia64-devel-boun...@lists.xensource.com wrote: Hi, When I try recently Xen (Xen 3.4 rc3) on IA64 machine (Tiger4), I found some strange issue. My two systems have 4 and 8 pcpus separately If VTI guest's vcpus is near pcpus, guest booting will meet some issues: 1. Guest boot

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Test Report] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18957 Status (Linux#767, ioemu#b36996b3..) --- one new issue

2009-01-14 Thread You, Yongkang
On Thursday, January 08, 2009 7:23 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: Isaku Yamahata writes (Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Test Report] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18957 Status (Linux#767, ioemu#b36996b3..) --- one new issue): Oh great. I'm forwarding the mail to Ian Jackson suspecting that he is not on the ia64

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Test Report] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18860 Status --- Dom0 Crash

2008-12-18 Thread You, Yongkang
time. If the default compilation is okay, do you think it is worthy to do more investigating? Any suggestion will be much appreciated. Best Regards, Yongkang You On Tuesday, December 16, 2008 10:22 AM, Isaku Yamahata wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 05:56:25PM +0800, You, Yongkang wrote

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Test Report] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18860 Status --- Dom0 Crash

2008-12-09 Thread You, Yongkang
On Monday, December 08, 2008 2:10 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote: On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 01:52:38PM +0800, Zhang, Jingke wrote: Isaku Yamahata wrote: On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 11:31:15AM +0800, Zhang, Jingke wrote: Hi Isaku, We re-get the detail information from serial port, please see below.

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH]E100 network card emulator

2007-11-28 Thread You, Yongkang
Em, it might be the issue of using default Linux e100 driver/ Qin, you can try with eepro100 driver. Best Regards, Yongkang You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zhang, Xing Z Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 10:11 PM To: Mu, Qin Cc:

RE: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Open GFW Howto

2007-11-21 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi Tristan, We met two main issues when building open guest firmware (OGFW). 1. The OGFW can not work, if we compile it in RHEL5 or 5.1 standard environment. And in RHEL5.1, we didn't meet the .dll copying issue. 2. Compiling OGFW in Dom0, Dom0 met hang (or crashing). Above issues might affect

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Open GFW Howto

2007-11-21 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi Alex, We didn't use Debian on our machine. :( At beginning, we want to put the OGFW into nightly testing too. Then it would monitor the OGFW's changing, and do normally testing to track its status. So we want to setup an easy building environment for it. But meeting a lot of troublesome.

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] IA64 using Redhat 5.1: xm createfails: Hotplugscripts not working.

2007-11-13 Thread You, Yongkang
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jarod Wilson Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 10:46 AM To: Kayvan Sylvan Cc: xen-ia64-devel Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] IA64 using Redhat 5.1: xm createfails: Hotplugscripts not working. Two other

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#16300

2007-11-01 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report IA64 PV driver build failure issue has been fixed. All cases passed in this changeset. Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2 Processor Logic Processors number: 8 (2 processors with Dual

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#16201

2007-10-23 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi Alex, It is a case issue to report wrong in past a few days. At beginning of case failure, we made a walk around for the case to let the testing runing smoothly. So it would always report fail. But we didn't check it often. It causees we didn't catch the bug fixing in time. :( Maybe it has

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen 3.1.1 RC2 testing report. -- 1 Blocked issue.

2007-09-28 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi Keir and all, All build failure issues have been fixed. The blocked issue is same with RC1. Creating HVM domain would crash IA32pae system. Beside the block issue, we got good testing results on IA32e and IA64 platform. Old issue: - 1)when using xm cr,dom0 will

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen 3.1.1 RC1 testing report.

2007-09-21 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi Keir and all, We did a testing towards 3.1.1 RC1. Several block issue we found. We only get full testing report on IA32e system. Issues list: 1. PV Driver can not build out. (Already report.) 2. IA64 build failure. (Alex has alread reported) 3. IA32 pae Dom0 is easily crashing, when

[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.1.1 RC1 testing report.

2007-09-21 Thread You, Yongkang
in 64bit Dom0. So this issue should be wrong info. Maybe the wrong env issue to cause the above failure. Best Regards, Yongkang You -Original Message- From: Keir Fraser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 4:28 AM To: You, Yongkang Cc: xen-devel; xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#15666

2007-08-01 Thread You, Yongkang
About XenU case fail, I have retested the changeset 15666, and I found that if I just tried only one xenU case it usually passed, and if I test more cases including xenU case sequentially, the bug usually occurred. But with changeset 15659 this bug occurs rarely. Hi Alex and Liuqing, I

[Xen-ia64-devel] Destroy VTI domain would cause Xen crashing in latest changeset 15557

2007-07-10 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi Alex and all, Our nightly testing system report last night testing met Xen crashing. The problem changeset would before 15556. I think the issue was brought in by 32 side's codes. After manually checking, the crashing would happen when destroy a VTI domain. The serial log: (XEN) Xen

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#15029

2007-05-08 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report No issue is found in this changeset. Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2 Processor Logic Processors number: 8 (2 processors with Due Core) PAL version: 8.47 Service OS: RHEL4u3 IA64 SMP

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#15044

2007-05-08 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report Nightly testing doesn't find any issue. Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2 Processor Logic Processors number: 8 (2 processors with Due Core and HT) PAL version: 8.47 Service OS: RHEL4u3

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#14828

2007-04-13 Thread You, Yongkang
The PV testing fail is because xen-balloon.ko insert failure. Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yang, Liuqing Sent: 2007年4月13日 14:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#14794

2007-04-11 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi Alex, We met following issue: /home/build/nightly/builds_xen_ia64_unstable/xen-3.0-hg-xen_ia64_unstable-14794-20070411/unmodified_drivers/linux-2.6/platform-pci/evtchn.c:44: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `DEFINE_MUTEX'

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#14794

2007-04-11 Thread You, Yongkang
Ok, I see there are some problems with the PV-on-HVM drivers. Does your PV testing only involve PV-on-HVM (ie. not PV-domains)? Thanks, Yes, Alex. We only tested HVM domain's PV drivers. Any hints about PV-domains? I just thought XenU is the PV domain. Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang)

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] Fix for re-enabling PV-on-HVM on IPF

2007-03-16 Thread You, Yongkang
We have tried the PV driver in changeset #14366. It is workable. :) We would add some basic regular nightly testing for them in the next week. We built them in a RHEL4u4 system and used in another VTI guest with same OS. Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 -Original Message- From:

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Take vacation from 10 Feb to 24 Feb.

2007-02-14 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi all, Our QA would be on vocation from 14 Feb to 25 Feb for the Spring Festival. There would be no nightly healthiness report for xen-ia64-unstable tree in this period. Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

[Xen-ia64-devel] XenU will crash Xen in CSet # 13773.

2007-02-01 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi all, In latest Changeset 13773, if creating XenU, Xen0 would crash and hang. The hang happened when XenU try to bring up its network. The serial console log is attached. BTW. VTI domain creation also meets a little issue, which is brought from xen-unstable. If try to create VTI domain with

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] XenU will crash Xen in CSet # 13773. -- wrong testing.

2007-02-01 Thread You, Yongkang
: On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 05:48:33PM +0800, You, Yongkang wrote: In latest Changeset 13773, if creating XenU, Xen0 would crash and hang. The hang happened when XenU try to bring up its network. At least domU network works for me. Looking the panic log, the issue looks similar which I was seeing

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#13475

2007-01-24 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report All testing cases pass. Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2 Processor Logic Processors number: 8 (2 processors with Due Core) Service OS: RHEL4u3 IA64 SMP with 2 vcpus 1G memory VTI

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#13472

2007-01-23 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report 1 SMP VTI testing case failed in daily testing progress. But after retesting more than 100 times for this case, we can not reproduce the failure. So just look it as the occasional case. Testing Environment:

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#13465

2007-01-18 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report All 16 cases pass testing. Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2 Processor Logic Processors number: 8 (2 processors with Due Core) Service OS: RHEL4u3 IA64 SMP with 2 vcpus 1G memory VTI

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#13433

2007-01-15 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report The latest changeset testing results are very stable. Both UP and SMP VTI domain can be created up in 1 minute. Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2 Processor Logic Processors number: 8

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] VTI Windows installation and booting HowTo

2006-12-06 Thread You, Yongkang
I've tried this many times, and I always seem to get stuck here. I do step #4 above, exit from EFI shell, and get a quick text flash that looks like it's selecting and booting Windows 2003, then my VNC session goes blank. It runs for a little over an hour consuming 100% of a vcpu, then

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#12464

2006-11-16 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report Several issues are still in this changeset: 1. VTI Linux domain boot slowly, if enabled 'serial=pty' 2. VTI Windows almost can not boot up with 'serial=pty' 3. Destroying 2 SMP XenU domains might meet Xen0 Crashing. 4. XenU might stop to

[Xen-ia64-devel] VTI Windows installation and booting HowTo

2006-11-16 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi all, VTI Windows 2003 has brought up in IA64 platform for a long time. Recently, by community and Intel's several important bugs fixing, SMP VTI Windows (8vcpus) could pass HCT stress testing for 24 hours. Here, I provide some steps for VTI Windows 2k3 installation and booting.

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#12444

2006-11-15 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report Several issues: 1. VTI Linux domain boot slowly, if enabled 'serial=pty' 2. VTI Windows almost can not boot up with 'serial=pty' 3. Destroying 2 SMP XenU domains might meet Xen0 Crashing. Jingke has reported it alone. 4. XenU might stop to

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Please try PV-on-HVM on IPF

2006-11-15 Thread You, Yongkang
HI Takanori, Thank you for the investigation and bug fixing. As you mentioned, X86 side also meets this problem recently, because there are some mechanism changing. Wait for your patches. :) Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Please try PV-on-HVM on IPF

2006-11-15 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi Takanori, I cannot correct this problem yet. I wanted only to confirm the correction method to the community. When the mechanism is changed, could you correct this problem? In this case, is it scheduled to be corrected about when? I saw an email from He, Qing in last month. He threw the

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#12425

2006-11-14 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report Several issues: 1. VTI Linux domain boot slowly, if enabled 'serial=pty' 2. VTI Windows almost can not boot up with 'serial=pty' 3. Destroying 2 SMP XenU domains might meet Xen0 Crashing. Except above issue, all nightly cases can pass in

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] xen-ia64-unstable merge

2006-11-08 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi Alex and Isaku, I have tried VTI using Alex merged tree (http://free.linux.hp.com/~awilliam/xen-ia64-merge/) When I tried to create VTI domain, the Xen0 crash and whole system rebooted. The logs are: --- (XEN) tlb_track_allocate_entries:69 allocated 256 num_entries 256

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] xen-ia64-unstable merge

2006-11-07 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi Alex, Is this http://free.linux.hp.com/~awilliam/xen-ia64-merge/ tree still there? I can not access it. Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Williamson Sent: 2006年11月8日 8:18 To: xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] xen-ia64-unstable merge

2006-11-07 Thread You, Yongkang
Alex, Oops, it is my network issue. The website is alive. :) Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of You, Yongkang Sent: 2006年11月8日 9:53 To: Alex Williamson; xen-ia64-devel Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] xen

[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Xen-devel] [Qemu]Fix for VTi's 3G memroy limit

2006-11-07 Thread You, Yongkang
This issue should be there for a little long time (before 3.0.3). But it performs a little strange. We found VTI domain can not be created up with 4096M memory by command xm create vti.config in recent changeset. But at least in xen 3.0.3 it still can be created up with same command. We have

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] VTi RHEL4U4 install?

2006-11-06 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi Alex, I also met the GPT issue, if I didn't use the GPT partitioned disk image file. But I can do installation successfully in VTI with ioemu(Qemu) disk. And installing again, the GPT issue is gone. But I did not understand how to install VTI Linux in a VBD disk. I just have the

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#12018

2006-11-03 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report Nightly testing failed in several XenU cases, but pass when retest. The reasons are not clear. When doing retesting, we also catch once Xen0 crashing in multi guest (SMP VTI Linux+XenU+WIndows) creating. No special serial log printed out.

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#12014

2006-11-01 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report Although all cases passed in nightly testing, we can still catch 4 VTI creating might fail at the same time. This issue also happened in IA32 side. Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel][PATCH] physical mode fix

2006-10-31 Thread You, Yongkang
This Patch could fix Xen might crashing issue when keeping creating/destroy VTI domains multi times. :) Thanks Anthony~ Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Xu, Anthony Sent: 2006年11月1日 12:05 To:

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#12007

2006-10-30 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report We caught 1 unstable issue in this Changeset. Creating 4 SMP VTI domain might fail. Sometimes 1 or 2 VTI domain can not be created up. Their CPU time just stop around 0.1 . Not sure if 12004 has the same issue. We will test more and

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#12004

2006-10-25 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report All nightly testing cases pass in changeset #12004 Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2 Processor Logic Processors number: 8 (2 processors with Due Core) PAL version: 8.15 Service OS:

[Xen-ia64-devel] 14 vcpus VTI domain (Xen/IA64) pass 16 hours Crashme testing.

2006-10-25 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi all, We have done several stress testing for SMP VTI domain. The testing results are good. SMP VTI domains can pass 2 kinds of Stress testing. 1. 16 hours Crashme for 14 vcpus SMP VTI domain on 2 vcpus SMP Xen0 Description: VTI+Xen0 vcpu number (14+2) = logical cpu number 16

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#11961

2006-10-24 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report VTI can not be created with default config bug has been fixed, after Alex help to pull the latest xen-unstable source. Now Xen/IA64 status comes back to stable again. :) There is still 1 strange issue will hang Xen0. It is doing a lot of

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#11824

2006-10-19 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report VTI Windows creation failure has been fixed in latest changeset. SMP VTI hang Xen0 issue has been fixed in latest changeset. Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2 Processor Logic Processors number: 8 (2 processors

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Please try PV-on-HVM on IPF

2006-10-18 Thread You, Yongkang
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2006年10月18日 15:56 To: You, Yongkang Cc: DOI Tsunehisa; xen-ia64-devel Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Please try PV-on-HVM on IPF Hi Yongkang, Thank you for your report. Does

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Please try PV-on-HVM on IPF

2006-10-18 Thread You, Yongkang
What is the guest OS vesion ? The VTI guest OS is RHEL4u3. Did you change kernel to linux-2.6.16 ? Yes. Or I can not even insert xen-platform.ko and xenbus.ko. ;) Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 ___ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Please try PV-on-HVM on IPF

2006-10-17 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi Tsunehisa, I have tried your patch and tried the modules in VTI domains. VBD hasn't problem. I can mount VBD hard disk xvda successfully. But VNIF modules has problems. After I tried to insmod VNIF driver, VTI domain crashed. My vnif config: vif= [ 'type=ioemu, bridge=xenbr0', ' ' ] BTW, I

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Please try PV-on-HVM on IPF

2006-10-17 Thread You, Yongkang
=eb15fbf0 bsp=eb1592e0 [a001c3c0] ia64_leave_kernel+0x0/0x280 sp=eb15fbf0 bsp=eb1592e0 Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of You, Yongkang

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Please try PV-on-HVM on IPF

2006-10-17 Thread You, Yongkang
HI Tsunehisa, More testing results based on changeset 11810: -- 1. I did a continuous KB in VTI VBD disk 35 times, all passed. The KB speed in VBD is a little faster than in IOEMU disk. 2. I did a lot of scp 1G file by VTI VNIF, all pass. The scp speed is extraordinary higher than

[Xen-ia64-devel] VTI also can not be created in rawhide.

2006-10-16 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi all, When I tried to create VTI in kernel-xen-2.6.18-1.2784.fc6, I met another strange issue. It would report disk image does not exist. If I not giving disk option, it will report guest firmware does not exist (kernel). But they are all in the path. :( Did you meet it? My xen is

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] VTI also can not be created in rawhide.

2006-10-16 Thread You, Yongkang
Sorry to send to the wrong mailling list. :( I should send it to fedora-ia64-xen. Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of You, Yongkang Sent: 2006年10月17日 11:40 To: xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com Subject

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#11810

2006-10-15 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report VTI Windows Creating failed. It kept crashing and recreating, when loading Windows boot load. Please see the attachment for the log. BTW, the changeset 11803 has good testing results. Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor:

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [IPF] Xen3.0.3 RC3 can not create VTI_domain

2006-10-11 Thread You, Yongkang
This issue only happened on creating VTI domain in IPF platform. Creating IA32 or IA32E VMX domain is okay. Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zhang, Jingke Sent: 2006年10月11日 16:35 To:

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#11635

2006-09-28 Thread You, Yongkang
be 11635. Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 -Original Message- From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2006年9月28日 14:41 To: You, Yongkang; xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#11609 Le Mercredi 27 Septembre 2006

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#11609

2006-09-28 Thread You, Yongkang
HI Yoshinori, Thanks for reproduce. But if want to create xenU successfully again, I have to reboot the machine. :) Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 -Original Message- From: Yoshinori Katase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2006年9月28日 16:47 To: You, Yongkang; xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#11609

2006-09-27 Thread You, Yongkang
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of You, Yongkang Sent: 2006年9月27日 15:05 To: xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#11609 Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report 2 XenU coexisting case failed. If try to create 2 XenU

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] FC6 Test3 Xentest result

2006-09-26 Thread You, Yongkang
Griffis Sent: 2006年9月21日 22:45 To: You, Yongkang Cc: xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Fedora-xen] Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Fedora-ia64-list] FC6 Test3 Xentest result You, Yongkang wrote: [Wed Sep 20 2006, 01:46:22AM EDT] [Bug 207227] New: Xen0 reboot command can

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#11609

2006-09-24 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report All 16 nightly testing cases pass in #11605 and #11609 Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2 Processor Logic Processors number: 8 (2 processors with Due Core) PAL version: 8.15 Service OS: RHEL4u3 IA64 SMP with 2 VCPUs

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Fedora-ia64-list] FC6 Test3 Xen test result

2006-09-22 Thread You, Yongkang
(Kangkang) 永康 -Original Message- From: Akio Takebe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2006年9月22日 13:06 To: You, Yongkang; Yang, Fred; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com; Akio Takebe Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Fedora-ia64-list] FC6 Test3 Xen test result

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Fedora-ia64-list] FC6 Test3 Xen test result

2006-09-21 Thread You, Yongkang
to check hda, hdb etc. again. Thanks for this information. Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 -Original Message- From: Akio Takebe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2006年9月21日 10:18 To: Akio Takebe; You, Yongkang; Yang, Fred; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Fedora-ia64-list] FC6 Test3 Xen test result

2006-09-19 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi Fred Yoshi, The former XenU creating failure issue seemed to be the config issue. Now I can create XenU. But XenU booting process met an old bug. It will cost a long time to check hard disk IRQ response from hda to hdh. After that, xenU met the problem of mounting root partition to start

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Fedora-ia64-list] FC6 Test3 Xen test result

2006-09-19 Thread You, Yongkang
. Sometime Xen0 monitor will print Bug: soft lockup detected on CPU#0(or #1) Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of You, Yongkang Sent: 2006年9月20日 10:07 To: Yang, Fred; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#11456

2006-09-13 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report We didn't meet vif vbd issue in this changeset by some testing. Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2 Processor Logic Processors number: 8 (2 processors with Due Core) PAL version: 8.15 Service OS: RHEL4u3 IA64 SMP

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#11447

2006-09-10 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report Nightly testing still met: Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not working. , after a lot of times creating and destroying domains. IA32 side also met similar issue sometimes, but not so easy like IA64 side. It has to reboot testing

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#11416

2006-09-05 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report 11416 do has 11414 issues, when try several times creating/destroying multi Guest at the same time. For example, VTI domain or XenU creating failed with error message: Error: Device 768 (vbd) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not working. Other issues is if

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#11414

2006-09-01 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report 11414 got regression. VTI and XenU couldn't be created, after doing several times creating and destroying. It is why nightly testing report shows so many testing cases failed. But they can be pass in manually retest. Three main issues I met: 1. vif could not be

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#11333

2006-08-29 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report The good news is all automatically nightly testing cases passed. We didn't see this for a long time. Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2 Processor Logic Processors number: 8 (2 processors with Due Core) PAL

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] vcpu-pin bug to dom0 ?

2006-08-28 Thread You, Yongkang
:35 To: You, Yongkang; xen-devel; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] vcpu-pin bug to dom0 ? Hi Yongkang, Hi all, I find a strange issue that if I only assign 1 or 2 vcpus to dom0, I can not use vcpu-pin to pin the No. 0 vcpu. It will report

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#11320

2006-08-28 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report 11320 has some improvements in VTI and XenU stability. In nightly testing, it only catches can not allocate memory issue twice. VTI unstable issue has been fixed by Anthony. Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#11270

2006-08-25 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report We switch default nightly testing from UP Xen0 to SMP Xen0. 11270 can not create VTI domain if Xen0 is UP and using credit scheduler. But SMP xen0 hasn't problem with credit scheduler. This problem also doesn't happen if changing to bvt scheduler. Testing

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#11265

2006-08-24 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report Nightly testing still meet several issues. I reported a bug about xm list fail, after try to create 4 XenU guest at the same time. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=747 Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#11052

2006-08-23 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report A lot of testing cases failed in 11052, including VTI and XenU testing. Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2 Processor Logic Processors number: 8 (2 processors with Due Core) PAL version: 8.15 Service OS: RHEL4u3 IA64

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [Fedora-ia64-list] Some testing result aboutXen in FC6-test2

2006-08-23 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi Akio, Thank you for your information~ :) I am expecting next Rawhide can boot up Xen0. Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akio Takebe Sent: 2006年8月24日 11:52 To: ia64 Fedora Core Development Cc:

[Xen-ia64-devel] Does anyone try to create 4 XenU successfully at the same time?

2006-08-21 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi all, I just tried to do such a testing. But it is failed. 2 of them disappeared in the middle. And after that, Xend seemed broken. Xm list will report Device 769 not connected Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 ___ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#11039

2006-08-14 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2 Processor Logic Processors number: 8 (2 processors with Due Core + HT) PAL version: 8.15 Service OS: RHEL4u3 IA64 VTI Guest OS: RHEL4u2 RHEL4u3 XenU Guest OS: RHEL4u2 Xen IA64

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [ww32]

2006-08-10 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi Fujita, Xen-devel also met issue. We can use following patch can resolve it. Have a try. diff -r 0e32095a7b46 tools/examples/xend-config.sxp --- a/tools/examples/xend-config.sxpWed Aug 9 21:34:27 2006 +0100 +++ b/tools/examples/xend-config.sxpThu Aug 10 10:52:41 2006 +0800 @@ -54,7

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#11031

2006-08-10 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report 11031 has two issues, which will block testing. 1. xend couldn't start. 2. qemu window couldn't pop up. Xin Li has helped to fix above two issues and send out the patch to xen-devel We only do several manually testing with the patch. Or all testing will fail.

[Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] xmexample.vti updating.

2006-08-10 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi Alex, This patch is to keep VTI config file to fit for new QEMU and control panel changing. The differences were copied from xmexample.hvm . Signed-off-by: Yongkang You [EMAIL PROTECTED] Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 vticonfig.patch Description: vticonfig.patch

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#10937

2006-08-08 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report We did nightly testing with bvt and credit separately. We found VTI domain was hardly created successfully with credit scheduler. Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2 Processor Logic Processors number: 4 PAL

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#10931

2006-08-07 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report 10931 doesn’t find new bugs compared with 10927 Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2 Processor Logic Processors number: 4 PAL version: 8.15 Service OS: RHEL4u3 IA64 VTI Guest OS: RHEL4u2 RHEL4u3 XenU Guest OS:

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#10932

2006-08-07 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2 Processor Logic Processors number: 4 PAL version: 8.15 Service OS: RHEL4u3 IA64 VTI Guest OS: RHEL4u2 RHEL4u3 XenU Guest OS: RHEL4u2 Xen IA64 Unstable tree: 10932:571022d5afa2 Xen

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#10927

2006-08-04 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report 10927 doesn’t find new bugs compared with 10922 Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2 Processor Logic Processors number: 4 PAL version: 8.15 Service OS: RHEL4u3 IA64 VTI Guest OS: RHEL4u2 RHEL4u3 XenU Guest OS:

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#10922

2006-08-03 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report We met several new issues in this Changeset. It cost us a lot time to reproduce and locate the problem. Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2 Processor Logic Processors number: 4 PAL version: 8.15 Service OS: RHEL4u3

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] How to enable serial console input in Xen0

2006-07-31 Thread You, Yongkang
booting output in my serial console. But I can not input anything, just like I didn't set agetty in /etc/inittab. :( Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 -Original Message- From: Alex Williamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2006年7月31日 23:04 To: You, Yongkang Cc: xen-ia64-devel

[Xen-ia64-devel] How to enable serial console input in Xen0

2006-07-30 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi all, I just recognized I couldn’t operate Xen0 from its serial console in recent Changeset. But it is okay before. I am not sure if it needs some new configurations in Xen0. Or it is a bug? Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 ___ Xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#10831

2006-07-28 Thread You, Yongkang
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of You, Yongkang Sent: 2006年7月28日 13:20 To: Alex Williamson Cc: xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#10831 Yes. Xm list shows everything is right. But I can not connect to the 2nd one. Could you? :( Best

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#10811:254c090854de

2006-07-27 Thread You, Yongkang
to this patch? Maybe it fix some potential issue for VTI domain. Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 -Original Message- From: Isaku Yamahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2006年7月27日 19:15 To: You, Yongkang Cc: xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#10811:254c090854de

2006-07-27 Thread You, Yongkang
-Original Message- From: Isaku Yamahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2006年7月28日 9:39 To: You, Yongkang Cc: xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#10811:254c090854de little hard to reproduce. Actually we only see a few times

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#10831

2006-07-27 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report Good news: VTI domain can start up in new Qemu 0.8.1 without vif option. Bad news: __coexisting__ domain testing failed in latest upstream. That means can not create 2 domains at the same time. Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#10831

2006-07-27 Thread You, Yongkang
BTW, two XenU domain coexisting testing can pass in Changeset 10818:199d53efd029 Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of You, Yongkang Sent: 2006年7月28日 10:49 To: xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com Subject

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#10831

2006-07-27 Thread You, Yongkang
Yes. Xm list shows everything is right. But I can not connect to the 2nd one. Could you? :( Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 -Original Message- From: Alex Williamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2006年7月28日 11:11 To: You, Yongkang Cc: xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com Subject: RE

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report - Cset#10706:2db50529223e

2006-07-26 Thread You, Yongkang
Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report Today we have done 2 times testing. The tip 10784:97cc7ed90061 has Qemu issue in building and testing. So no testing results for it. Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2 Processor Logic Processors number: 4 Service

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report - Cset#10705:47fc48740d45

2006-07-25 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi all, I will try to send out the daily testing report for Xen/IA64 unstable tree from now on, if there is any new patch checked in. This is the first issue. Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report Testing Environment: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2 Processor Logic

[Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly Xen-IA64/VTI status report.

2006-07-14 Thread You, Yongkang
Hi all, In early of this week, creating VTI will hang Xen0 in our platform. This issue had disappeared in Changeset 10696. Major Issues: ==. 1. Xen0 XWindows can not start up. Bugs fixed: == 1. Fix creating VTI hang Xen0 issue. 2. Fix creating VTI may crash Xen0 issue with new

  1   2   >