[XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6][TOOLS][XM-TEST] Update xm-test to support new architectures

2006-10-02 Thread Tony Breeds
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 07:46:54AM -0700, Daniel Stekloff wrote: > Have you run with HVM guests as well? Not that I think there's a > problem... I don't have access to HVM hardware so I haven't been able to run those tests. Likewise I haven't tested it on ia64 and x86_64. I think for those plat

[XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6][TOOLS][XM-TEST] Update xm-test to support new architectures

2006-10-02 Thread Daniel Stekloff
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 20:56 +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi All, > These patches update the xm-test code to be more easily portable > to new architecture. This focus od this endevour is PPC but I believe > that IA64 also benifits. > > Patch summary: > > 1: Instead of using a dated snapshot

Re: [XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6][TOOLS][XM-TEST] Update xm-test to support new architectures

2006-10-02 Thread Hollis Blanchard
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 16:30 +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: > > I build xm-test: > cd xen.hg/tools/xm-test > ./autogen > ./configure > INITRD="http://ozlabs.au.ibm.com/~tony/xm-test/"; make existing Unfortunately this is an IBM-internal URL, so I've removed it from the wiki page (http://wiki.xensource

Re: [XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6][TOOLS][XM-TEST] Update xm-test to support new architectures

2006-10-02 Thread Dan Smith
JX> Either we cannot run xm-test with debug kernels or xm-test has JX> some way of detecting this condition, the later wouls be JX> preferred. Dan, Sean, any comments? If there is a known xmon prompt, then you could modify Console.py to look for this prompt and throw an error (or a signal) to not

Re: [XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6][TOOLS][XM-TEST] Update xm-test to support new architectures

2006-10-02 Thread Jimi Xenidis
On Oct 1, 2006, at 8:25 AM, Jimi Xenidis wrote: On Oct 1, 2006, at 2:30 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: [1] I omitted create/destroy, save/restore, network* and the scheduler tests becuase I know some of them crash the machine, attached is the xenppc file I used. Ok, so I just tried

Re: [XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6][TOOLS][XM-TEST] Update xm-test to support new architectures

2006-10-01 Thread Jimi Xenidis
/me shows utter sadness mapled:~/work/xen/xenppc-unstable.hg/tools/xm-test # ./runtest.sh - d foobar (Skipping report submission) Running sanity checks... REASON: Failed to create domain Sanity checks failed mapled:~/work/xen/xenppc-unstable.hg/tools/xm-test # can't get it off the g

Re: [XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6][TOOLS][XM-TEST] Update xm-test to support new architectures

2006-10-01 Thread Jimi Xenidis
On Oct 1, 2006, at 2:30 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:56:54PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: Hi All, These patches update the xm-test code to be more easily portable to new architecture. This focus od this endevour is PPC but I believe that IA64 also benifits. By way

[XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6][TOOLS][XM-TEST] Update xm-test to support new architectures

2006-09-30 Thread Tony Breeds
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:56:54PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi All, > These patches update the xm-test code to be more easily portable > to new architecture. This focus od this endevour is PPC but I believe > that IA64 also benifits. By way of a quick status report. With all thee patch