On Oct 25, 2006, at 9:02 PM, Maria Butrico wrote:
I want to quibble about this change.
First this is not an
# Automatically generated make config: don't edit
Yes it is.
I thought we diligently updated this file by hand. We edit it all
the time. The comment is flat out wrong. (I know
Why did you change the date?
Jimi did not change the date by hand. The Kconfig logic discussed
above
did so, and I believe that the myriad benefits of that logic outweigh
the cost of resolving the trivial merge conflict caused by the date.
Perhaps we can investigate removing the date insert
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 09:02:29PM -0400, Maria Butrico wrote:
> I thought we diligently updated this file by hand. We edit it all the
> time. The comment is flat out wrong.
The file is in fact automatically generated. Nobody should ever edit a
defconfig by hand, since the Kconfig logic that
I want to quibble about this change.
First this is not an
# Automatically generated make config: don't edit
I thought we diligently updated this file by hand. We edit it all the
time. The comment is flat out wrong. (I know you did not change the
comment today, but I am in a quibbling m
# HG changeset patch
# User Jimi Xenidis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# Node ID f4d382795e57b926cd82256bcb3a74c539731796
# Parent 4ab8b63fcff117bec150b9f6afd3ff292f51c1dd
[LINUX][XEN][POWEPRC] def config changes
- turn off SCSI and IPR debugging now that it works
- add CONFIG_NUMA to complimenet the mem
