Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Anders Blomdell wrote:
My distinct feeling is that the return value should be a scalar and
not a set!
To sum up, the valid return values are HANDLED, HANDLED | ENABLE (*),
HANDLED | CHAINED and CHAINED. It's currently a set because I once
thought th
On 09/02/06, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:> Anders Blomdell wrote:>>> My distinct feeling is that the return value should be a scalar and>> not a set! To sum up, the valid return values are HANDLED, HANDLED | ENABLE (*),
> HANDLED | CHAINED and CHAINED. It's curren
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Anders Blomdell wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA ->
XN_ISR
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Anders Blomdell wrote:
>
>> My distinct feeling is that the return value should be a scalar and
>> not a set!
>>
>
> To sum up, the valid return values are HANDLED, HANDLED | ENABLE (*),
> HANDLED | CHAINED and CHAINED. It's currently a set because I once
> thought that th
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Anders Blomdell wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA ->
XN_ISR_
Anders Blomdell wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA ->
XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups a
Anders Blomdell wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>>
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
>
> It addresses mostly remarks concerning
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA ->
XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups and updated comments.
Fun
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Anders Blomdell wrote:
My distinct feeling is that the return value should be a scalar and
not a set!
To sum up, the valid return values are HANDLED, HANDLED | ENABLE (*),
HANDLED | CHAINED and CHAINED. It's currently a set because I once
thought th
On 09/02/06, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:> Anders Blomdell wrote:>>> My distinct feeling is that the return value should be a scalar and>> not a set! To sum up, the valid return values are HANDLED, HANDLED | ENABLE (*),
> HANDLED | CHAINED and CHAINED. It's curren
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Anders Blomdell wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA ->
XN_ISR
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Anders Blomdell wrote:
>
>> My distinct feeling is that the return value should be a scalar and
>> not a set!
>>
>
> To sum up, the valid return values are HANDLED, HANDLED | ENABLE (*),
> HANDLED | CHAINED and CHAINED. It's currently a set because I once
> thought that th
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Anders Blomdell wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA ->
XN_ISR_
Anders Blomdell wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA ->
XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups a
Anders Blomdell wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>>
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
>
> It addresses mostly remarks concerning
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA ->
XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups and updated comments.
Fun
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA ->
XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups and updated comments.
Functionally, the support f
On 08/02/06, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still prefer configuration options as they also allow to reduce the> overall code size (less cache refills and TLB misses). And shared
> interrupts are for x86 only (approximately), I think. Unfortunately, IOk, that's a good argument. Then ma
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA ->
XN_ISR_EDGE),
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA ->
XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups and updated comments.
Functionally, the support for
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA ->
XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups and updated comments.
Functionally, the support f
On 08/02/06, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still prefer configuration options as they also allow to reduce the> overall code size (less cache refills and TLB misses). And shared
> interrupts are for x86 only (approximately), I think. Unfortunately, IOk, that's a good argument. Then ma
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA ->
XN_ISR_EDGE),
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA ->
XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups and updated comments.
Functionally, the support for
On 07/02/06, Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,> [skip-skip-skip]> Happy testing ! :)My concern is code size. I see that the patches add substantial amountof code to the ISR. What about make this feature configurable?
Yes, I though about making the new stuff optionally configura
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
>>
>> It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA ->
>> XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups and updated comments.
>>
>> Functionally, the sup
On 07/02/06, Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,> [skip-skip-skip]> Happy testing ! :)My concern is code size. I see that the patches add substantial amountof code to the ISR. What about make this feature configurable?
Yes, I though about making the new stuff optionally configura
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA ->
XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups and updated comments.
Functionally, the support for shared interrupts (a few flags) to the
rtd
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
>>
>> It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA ->
>> XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups and updated comments.
>>
>> Functionally, the sup
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA -> XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups and updated comments.
Functionally, the support for shared interrupts (a few flags) to the rtdm (Jan's patch) and native skin.
In th
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA ->
XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups and updated comments.
Functionally, the support for shared interrupts (a few flags) to the
rtd
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA -> XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups and updated comments.
Functionally, the support for shared interrupts (a few flags) to the rtdm (Jan's patch) and native skin.
In th
32 matches
Mail list logo
