On Jan 22, 2008 5:23 PM, Philippe Gerum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>> Philippe,
> >>>
> >>> what was the idea behind commit #3256 [1]? It breaks the original
> >>> behavior of selection adeos-ipipe-2.6.23-... in the presence of 2
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Philippe,
>>>
>>> what was the idea behind commit #3256 [1]? It breaks the original
>>> behavior of selection adeos-ipipe-2.6.23-... in the presence of 2.6.23.x
>>> - and leaves a bad first impression for beginners (I received such a
>>
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Philippe,
>>
>> what was the idea behind commit #3256 [1]? It breaks the original
>> behavior of selection adeos-ipipe-2.6.23-... in the presence of 2.6.23.x
>> - and leaves a bad first impression for beginners (I received such a
>> notice here...). Was this
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Philippe,
>
> what was the idea behind commit #3256 [1]? It breaks the original
> behavior of selection adeos-ipipe-2.6.23-... in the presence of 2.6.23.x
> - and leaves a bad first impression for beginners (I received such a
> notice here...). Was this for the special case
> a
Philippe,
what was the idea behind commit #3256 [1]? It breaks the original
behavior of selection adeos-ipipe-2.6.23-... in the presence of 2.6.23.x
- and leaves a bad first impression for beginners (I received such a
notice here...). Was this for the special case
adeos-ipipe-2.6.20.21-i386-1.12-0
