On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 08:41:20PM +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> You may want to try this one:
> http://download.gna.org/adeos/patches/v2.6/i386/adeos-ipipe-2.6.15-i386-1.1-03.patch
That builds for me--I'll try running it tomorrow.
Thanks,
-kb
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jim Cromie wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
You may want to try this one:
http://download.gna.org/adeos/patches/v2.6/i386/adeos-ipipe-2.6.15-i386-1.1-03.patch
although Im not surprised, I feel like telling someone,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a
Linux harpo.jimc.earth
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 08:41:20PM +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> You may want to try this one:
> http://download.gna.org/adeos/patches/v2.6/i386/adeos-ipipe-2.6.15-i386-1.1-03.patch
That builds for me--I'll try running it tomorrow.
Thanks,
-kb
___
X
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jim Cromie wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
You may want to try this one:
http://download.gna.org/adeos/patches/v2.6/i386/adeos-ipipe-2.6.15-i386-1.1-03.patch
although Im not surprised, I feel like telling someone,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a
Linux harpo.jimc.earth
Jim Cromie wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
You may want to try this one:
http://download.gna.org/adeos/patches/v2.6/i386/adeos-ipipe-2.6.15-i386-1.1-03.patch
although Im not surprised, I feel like telling someone,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a
Linux harpo.jimc.earth 2.6.15-ipipe-103-sony #
Philippe Gerum wrote:
You may want to try this one:
http://download.gna.org/adeos/patches/v2.6/i386/adeos-ipipe-2.6.15-i386-1.1-03.patch
although Im not surprised, I feel like telling someone,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a
Linux harpo.jimc.earth 2.6.15-ipipe-103-sony #1 Sat Jan 7 13:54:0
Kent Borg wrote:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 12:52:23AM -0700, Jim Cromie wrote:
You get to keep both pieces ? ;-)
Cool!
Ive attached my working config - might get you going. pls report
back what made your config not work, once you find it.
I'm looking at it now. In the meantime, if anyo
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 12:52:23AM -0700, Jim Cromie wrote:
> You get to keep both pieces ? ;-)
Cool!
> Ive attached my working config - might get you going. pls report
> back what made your config not work, once you find it.
I'm looking at it now. In the meantime, if anyone is interested in
l
Jim Cromie wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
You may want to try this one:
http://download.gna.org/adeos/patches/v2.6/i386/adeos-ipipe-2.6.15-i386-1.1-03.patch
although Im not surprised, I feel like telling someone,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a
Linux harpo.jimc.earth 2.6.15-ipipe-103-sony #
Philippe Gerum wrote:
You may want to try this one:
http://download.gna.org/adeos/patches/v2.6/i386/adeos-ipipe-2.6.15-i386-1.1-03.patch
although Im not surprised, I feel like telling someone,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a
Linux harpo.jimc.earth 2.6.15-ipipe-103-sony #1 Sat Jan 7 13:54:0
Jim Cromie wrote:
Kent Borg wrote:
Jim Cromie posted a patch attempt for 2.6.15 (yeah!), and the patch
applied, but it doesn't compile for me:
[...]
LD init/built-in.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o: In function `__ipipe_sync_stage':
: undefined reference to `r
Kent Borg wrote:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 12:52:23AM -0700, Jim Cromie wrote:
You get to keep both pieces ? ;-)
Cool!
Ive attached my working config - might get you going. pls report
back what made your config not work, once you find it.
I'm looking at it now. In the meantime, if anyo
Jim Cromie wrote:
[...]
FWIW, I diffed the 14 patch against mine, was puzzled at the large
textual diffs.
Guessed that it was a file ordering diff in the tar, and then forgot to
Yes, I was wondering about the ordering for a long time myself.
I bet this is has to do with CVS.
Philippe, how do
Kent Borg wrote:
Jim Cromie posted a patch attempt for 2.6.15 (yeah!), and the patch
applied, but it doesn't compile for me:
[...]
LD init/built-in.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o: In function `__ipipe_sync_stage':
: undefined reference to `ret_from_intr'
arch
Jim Cromie wrote:
Kent Borg wrote:
Jim Cromie posted a patch attempt for 2.6.15 (yeah!), and the patch
applied, but it doesn't compile for me:
[...]
LD init/built-in.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o: In function `__ipipe_sync_stage':
: undefined reference to `r
Jim Cromie wrote:
[...]
FWIW, I diffed the 14 patch against mine, was puzzled at the large
textual diffs.
Guessed that it was a file ordering diff in the tar, and then forgot to
Yes, I was wondering about the ordering for a long time myself.
I bet this is has to do with CVS.
Philippe, how do
Kent Borg wrote:
Jim Cromie posted a patch attempt for 2.6.15 (yeah!), and the patch
applied, but it doesn't compile for me:
[...]
LD init/built-in.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o: In function `__ipipe_sync_stage':
: undefined reference to `ret_from_intr'
arch
Jim Cromie posted a patch attempt for 2.6.15 (yeah!), and the patch
applied, but it doesn't compile for me:
[...]
LD init/built-in.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o: In function `__ipipe_sync_stage':
: undefined reference to `ret_from_intr'
arch/i386/kernel/b
Jim Cromie posted a patch attempt for 2.6.15 (yeah!), and the patch
applied, but it doesn't compile for me:
[...]
LD init/built-in.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o: In function `__ipipe_sync_stage':
: undefined reference to `ret_from_intr'
arch/i386/kernel/b
Hi Jim,
Jim Cromie wrote:
hi Phillipe, everyone,
happy 06 !
Bugfree 06? Nah, just kidding...
Out of curiosity, I applied adeos-ipipe-2.6.14-i386-1.1-01.patch on top
of 15.
the rejects were small, and simple enough looking, that even
a lazy sod like myself might manually fix them, so I d
Hi Jim,
Jim Cromie wrote:
hi Phillipe, everyone,
happy 06 !
Bugfree 06? Nah, just kidding...
Out of curiosity, I applied adeos-ipipe-2.6.14-i386-1.1-01.patch on top
of 15.
the rejects were small, and simple enough looking, that even
a lazy sod like myself might manually fix them, so I d
hi Phillipe, everyone,
happy 06 !
Out of curiosity, I applied adeos-ipipe-2.6.14-i386-1.1-01.patch on top
of 15.
the rejects were small, and simple enough looking, that even
a lazy sod like myself might manually fix them, so I did.
whats more, it built clean and booted !
I havent done anythi
hi Phillipe, everyone,
happy 06 !
Out of curiosity, I applied adeos-ipipe-2.6.14-i386-1.1-01.patch on top
of 15.
the rejects were small, and simple enough looking, that even
a lazy sod like myself might manually fix them, so I did.
whats more, it built clean and booted !
I havent done anythi
23 matches
Mail list logo