Heikki Lindholm wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
There's the if. What I've seen on sourceforge is that often times
bugs
that are reported on the ml don't appear in the tracker and vice versa,
although the tracker can probably be configured to
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
Looks good, doesn't place too much burden on the user. One might
consider adding details of the hardware platform used
(CPU/chipset/etc) or similar, because that isn't necessarily obvious
from the configs.
Done, thanks.
--
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
Btw. Do you think the Task/Patch/Tech Support Managers are worth using?
If not, can the unused(/-ful) ones be disabled from the site?
We will wait for the web site to sort this out.
--
Gilles Chanteperdrix.
Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti:
Hi,
GNA offers a bug tracking system which is undoubtely a useful tool
for lots of projects. What about using it for the Xenomai project ?
I'm not stronly opposing, but in my opinion it causes information to
scatter in contrast to the ml. There'll be bug
I'm not stronly opposing, but in my opinion it causes
information to scatter in contrast to the ml. There'll be bug
reports on the ml regardless of having or not having a bug
tracking system in function. It's more difficult to
follow/search two places than one. And this project isn't the
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti:
Hi,
GNA offers a bug tracking system which is undoubtely a useful tool
for lots of projects. What about using it for the Xenomai project ?
I'm not stronly opposing, but in my opinion it causes information to
scatter in
Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti:
Hi,
GNA offers a bug tracking system which is undoubtely a useful tool
for lots of projects. What about using it for the Xenomai project ?
It's more difficult to follow/search two places
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
There's the if. What I've seen on sourceforge is that often times bugs
that are reported on the ml don't appear in the tracker and vice versa,
although the tracker can probably be configured to forward reports to
ml, or? Who will type the ml-only reports to the
Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
There's the if. What I've seen on sourceforge is that often times bugs
that are reported on the ml don't appear in the tracker and vice versa,
although the tracker can probably be configured to forward reports to
ml, or? Who will
