Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: Xenomai broken on Linux 2.4

Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Philippe, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: We try to find a way to wrap class_device_create properly depending on the kernel version Xeno is compiled against. The parent device class argument in this call (2nd in order) seems to show up in 2.6.15 for

[Xenomai-core] [PATCH] merge powerpc fpu.S and fpu_64.S

Currently the two powerpc fpu*.S assembly sections are so similar that there's really no need for two of them. Merge them into a common fpu.S. Tested on a G5. -- Heikki Lindholm diff -Nru xenomai/ksrc/arch/powerpc/fpu.S xenomai-devel/ksrc/arch/powerpc/fpu.S --- xenomai/ksrc/arch/powerpc/fpu.S

[Xenomai-core] rt_pipe_create() and P_MINOR_AUTO

Hello, First things first: I am using version Xenomai 2.0.1 on a recompiled Ubuntu kernel version 2.6.14.3. I am confused by rt_pipe_create(), specifically, the minor parameter. The writeup at

Re: [Xenomai-core] rt_pipe_create() and P_MINOR_AUTO

Kent Borg wrote: Hello, First things first: I am using version Xenomai 2.0.1 on a recompiled Ubuntu kernel version 2.6.14.3. I am confused by rt_pipe_create(), specifically, the minor parameter. The writeup at

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: Xenomai broken on Linux 2.4

Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Philippe, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: We try to find a way to wrap class_device_create properly depending on the kernel version Xeno is compiled against. The parent device class argument in this call (2nd in order) seems to show up in 2.6.15 for

[Xenomai-core] [PATCH] merge powerpc fpu.S and fpu_64.S

Currently the two powerpc fpu*.S assembly sections are so similar that there's really no need for two of them. Merge them into a common fpu.S. Tested on a G5. -- Heikki Lindholm diff -Nru xenomai/ksrc/arch/powerpc/fpu.S xenomai-devel/ksrc/arch/powerpc/fpu.S --- xenomai/ksrc/arch/powerpc/fpu.S

[Xenomai-core] Xenomai t0-2 latency measurements

Hello, attached you will find the results of my todays Xenomai latency measurements on various PowerPC boards with Linux 2.4 and 2.6. Wolfgang. New latency tests with Xenomai on various PowerPC boards Board : Processor CPU-Clk

[Xenomai-core] [patch] factoring arithmetic routines.

Hi, For your review, here is an attempt to factor arithmetic routines in asm-generic/hal.h. I am not sure the way I did it is the best one. Maybe defining some HAVE_ARCH symbols, would have been better. Maybe moving the definitions in asm-generic/system.h would have been better than the

Re: [Xenomai-core] [patch] factoring arithmetic routines.

Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Hi, For your review, here is an attempt to factor arithmetic routines in asm-generic/hal.h. And with the blackfin architecture... -- Gilles Chanteperdrix. xeno-arith.diff Description: Binary data